THE 100% ERROR: MORGUE OFFICIAL

The sinister queer cult of Hyperianism, led by the malignant narcissist Corey Rebhahn (Morgue Official), is based on a 100% fallacy. This fallacy, which underpins EVERYTHING that Corey Rebhahn says, is the absurd claim that all of us constitute an IDENTITY. Mind-bogglingly, Rebhahn claims that his egregious fallacy is derived from “Leibniz’s law”, which actually says the EXACT OPPOSITE.

This is precisely what happens when an idiot pretends to be a philosopher. The even more depressing thing is that hundreds of groomed and brainwashed cultists actually believe this clown. Of course, these Dunning-Kruger dunces know even less about philosophy than Rebhahn does. But Hyperianism is a classic example of false ideas being spread and adopted by stupid people – and how these people constitute an enormous threat to intelligence, the dissemination of the truth, and the evolution of humanity. This is the Idiocracy in microcosm.

So, Rebhahn staked everything on Leibniz’s law, and totally fucked it up. Well, he’s stupid, so why would anyone expect anything different?

What is Leibniz’s law? Let’s just quote the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:

“The Identity of Indiscernibles is a principle of analytic ontology first explicitly formulated by Wilhelm Gottfried Leibniz in his Discourse on Metaphysics, Section 9 (Loemker 1969: 308). It states that no two distinct substances exactly resemble each other. This is often referred to as ‘Leibniz’s Law’ and is typically understood to mean that no two objects have exactly the same properties.”

Let’s just emphasize the takeaway point … Leibniz’s Law asserts that no two objects have exactly the same properties. That means that no two different things can ever be considered IDENTICAL. They can never be an IDENTITY.

Here are a few quotes to fix this very firmly in everyone’s minds:

“Each monad, indeed, must be different from every other monad. For there are never in nature two beings which are exactly alike, and in which it is not possible to find a difference either internal or based on an intrinsic property.” – Leibniz

[Monads CANNOT be identical.]

“…it follows that it is not true that two substances can resemble each other completely…” – Leibniz

[Monads CANNOT be identical.]

“…a substance is not divisible into two…” – Leibniz

[You cannot divide a monad into other monads. Monads cannot exist within other monads as “potentialities” waiting for “difference” to be introduced.]

“…one substance cannot be constructed from two…” – Leibniz

[You cannot make a One Mind from other minds. You cannot create an “identity mind”.]

“…the number of substances does not increase and decrease…” – Leibniz

[You cannot have any process that supposedly makes monads an “identity” – one – and then differentiates them into many.]

“As Wittgenstein says in the ‘Tractatus’, to say of TWO things that they are identical is nonsense and to say of ONE thing that it is identical with itself is uninformative…” – Hide Ishiguro

[It’s impossible for two different monads to be identical; a monad can be identical ONLY with itself!]

“… there are not in the universe two perfectly similar – that is, absolutely indiscernible – beings or objects…” – Francis Bowen

[There are no different things that are identical.]

“In the whole realm of nature there cannot be found two portions of matter, TWO MINDS, two events, two anythings, that are perfectly equal and similar.” – Francis Bowen

[No different minds can be perfectly equal [identical] … there can be no “identity” between different monads.]

“No two monads are perfectly alike, this being forbidden by the Law of Indiscernibles…” – Francis Bowen

[Leibniz’s law – the Law of Indiscernibles – EXPLICITLY FORBIDS any claim that monads are identical and form an “identity”.]

“The principle of the identity of indiscernibles is a guarantee of variety.” – Roger Woolhouse

[The supposed “Identity” of many monads to be One Monad is strictly prohibited.]

“Leibniz’s law: The principle that if one thing is identical with another then anything that is true of the one must be true of another.” – The Pan Reference Dictionary of Philosophy

[To claim that one thing is identical to another thing is to claim that 100% of what can be said of one can also be said of the other, and vice versa, meaning that there is zero difference between the two things and they are therefore not two things, but just one thing.]

“Leibniz’s name is never absent from discussions of the principle of identity of indiscernibles according to which two things with all their properties in common are in reality one and the same thing…”- John Cottingham

[If “two” things are identical … are in an “identity” … then they are ONE THING, NOT TWO.]

“Identity of indiscernibles … mathematics … also known as Leibniz’s law: principle enunciated by G.W. Leibniz that denies the possibility of two objects being numerically distinct while sharing all their properties in common.” – The Encyclopedia Britannica says

[Two different things cannot have all their properties in common. Two different monads can never be identical. They can never form an “identity”.]

“In fact, I am so far from the plurality of the same individual, that I am quite convinced of what St Thomas [Aquinas] had already taught regarding intelligences [angels], and which I take to be generally true, namely that it is not possible that there should be two individuals who are exactly similar…” – Leibniz

[It’s impossible for two minds, two monads, to be identical, to be an identity.]

So, there we have it – as clear as day – that any claim that monads are identical and form an “identity”, an ontological ONENESS, is 100% fallacious, entirely false, completely absurd, and the precise opposite of what Leibniz’s Law states! It’s the biggest fail possible to claim that monads are or can be a Unity/Identity. It’s an absolute lie. It is a totally false claim about the nature of reality. Yet this, exactly this, is the keystone claim of Corey Rebhahn and his queer Hyperian cult. 100% of Rebhahn’s claims about how reality operates flow from his 100% proven fallacy! 100% of Rebhahn’s claims about the meaning and point and purpose of life are false since they all flow from a foundational error, an elementary fallacy.

Hyperianism is 100% disproven, and that’s no mere rhetoric. Rebhahn made a very precise claim using a very precise principle of analytic ontology (Leibniz’s law) … and got it 100% wrong. He literally inverted it! Yet this 100% wrong fallacy is the exact ground of Hyperianism and all of the “logic” of Hyperianism relies on it. So, given that the ground of Hyperianism is 100% false, so are ALL the claims of Hyperianism. There has never been a more definitively falsified faith system – because it based itself on a precise technical instrument and got it 100% wrong. Rebhahn literally didn’t understand Leibniz’s law, yet based EVERYTHING on it (on his MISUNDERSTANDING!).

Rebhahn, being totally stupid, didn’t grasp that what Leibniz was saying was that intrinsically different things can NEVER be identical. They can never be an IDENTITY. Instead, Rebhahn misinterpreted Leibniz’s law as saying that if intrinsically different things found themselves in the same functional state then they were thereby an IDENTITY … one thing. But of course intrinsically different things, by virtue of their intrinsic difference (!), can NEVER be identical and thus can NEVER be an “IDENTITY“. It is literally TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE … BY LEIBNIZ’S LAW.

Leibniz’s law does not prove Rebhahn’s ridiculous claims … it formally disproves them!!! It is their total refutation. And this is 100% the case, as we have just showed. There is zero room for doubt or debate here. Rebhahn has effectively said something as wholly false and absurd as 1 + 1 = 3. He has claimed that ontologically different things can be identical and form an “Identity”. This would of course be an ONTOLOGICAL identity since DIFFERENT things in a functionally same state are, by Leibniz’s law, NOT identical and not an identity. Anyone who cites Leibniz’s law is committed to claiming that everything is ONTOLOGICALLY ONE (and they are definitely NOT saying that different things are in a functional unity … because that assertion does not make any reference to Leibniz’s law since it is never being asserted that different things are indiscernibles and therefore an “identity”).

Here’s what Rebhahn actually said:

“We are functionally One and identical but we are still eternal individual minds.”

[You cannot be identical if you are a functional One rather than an ontological One. And to assert that we are eternally individual minds – meaning that we can be eternally distinguished from each other hence are by definition NOT indiscernibles – is already to have DENIED that Leibniz’s law can be applied since Leibniz’s law is ABOUT indiscernibles and to recognize discernibles (differences) is to already have acknowledged that Leibniz’s law cannot be relevant. But what does Rebhahn care? He’s a cretin, a malignant narcissist looking for narcissistic supply, and he will make up any nonsense and spout any garbage to get love, adoration and MONEY from his cult slave suckers. So, Rebhahn will go on spreading his total lies and fallacies regarding Leibniz’s FOREVER because they are essential to his grift and his whole Woke spiel and lying propaganda. His whole dumb Dunning-Kruger cult is founded on this fallacy and there is ZERO chance that he will ever admit that he got this totally wrong. This total liar who claims to be explaining the fundamental nature of reality will spend his life lying about the fundamental nature of reality. Because this queer man has no interest at all in the truth, in honesty, in intellectual integrity. His sole game is to be worshiped by suckers who are as alienated from truth, honesty and integrity as he is! He can dominate them because they are even stupider than he is. Such is life. That’s why this sick, dangerous, degenerate cult of queer liars must be stopped. These maniacs believe that their queerness is an intrinsic good and the central point of ethics. FFS! The world will be fantastically cruel to these freaks who have declared war on normality.]

Daniel Sollberger said,

“The problem of identity became a problem of substance throughout the history of philosophy in the efforts to define the principle of individuation. Leibniz in his Discourse on Metaphysics, summarized this principle in a mathematical law: it states that no two distinct things exactly resemble each other; otherwise they would be ‘indiscernibles’ and therefore one thing. In other words: two things are indistinguishable and in fact one single thing, if everything that truly can be said of the one may be said of the other as well. So, they become replaceable salva veritate (truth preserving) in any other possible context and under ANY other conditions.”

So, of course, if you say that I am one eternal mind and you are a different eternal mind then you have ipso facto acknowledged, for all eternity, that we are DISCERNIBLE and thus we can NEVER be an “identity”. And that of course is proved by Leibniz’s law (by which ONLY indiscernibles can be an “identity”). The only thing that can be an “identity” is, as Wittgenstein said so acutely, a thing that is identical with itself! Every monad is an identity strictly with regard to itself and is strictly NOT an identity with regard to any other monads. That’s what Leibniz’s law tells us and what Leibniz explicitly said. It’s the OPPOSITE of the defining claim of the circus clown Corey Rebhahn, a natural-born liar, marked from birth as one of the DAMNED. He was rejected as degenerate and evil by his own mother – and one can only wholeheartedly agree with her assessment of this moral abomination, this BEAST, who openly puts pictures on his social media of him posing as a PEDOPHILE. This queer man is totally disgusting and is a serious threat to children and the public. He even openly declared himself to be a MURDERER! Who does that? … other than a murderer!]

Aren’t reason and logic FANTASTIC? They can be used to 100% demolish the false claims of charlatans and conmen like Corey Rebhahn, a man getting more Christian by the day. Last night he actually said that he and his cult are the Christian Second Coming! WTF!

In a university setting – you know, full of intelligent, educated people – Rebhahn would be dead and buried. He would be openly laughed at. But Rebhahn doesn’t operate in a university setting. He operates in a cult setting – full of stupid, credulous, gullible, vulnerable, weak-minded people looking to be led and given a purpose – and the more lies and fallacies he spouts, the more popular he is. That’s what the cult scene is all about – tell the marks the lies they want to hear and watch the money and adoration flood in.

Rebhahn said,

“And Leibniz’s law basically says when multiple things are identical they are actually one thing.”

It says no such thing. It says that if “two” things are identical then THEY NEVER WERE TWO THINGS … “they” were ALWAYS ONE THING. Rebhahn’s hilarious error was to fail to understand that what Leibniz’s Law asserts is that different things definitionally CANNOT be the same thing. The only thing that can be the same thing, by Leibniz’s law, is a thing with regard to itself. It is obviously indistinguishable from itself, but is distinguishable from everything else because it is not them and they are not it! Duh!

And the fact that different things can enter into the same state – such as different Rubik’s cubes being in the same solved state! – doesn’t for one instant make them the same and an “identity”. Yet this is exactly what Rebhahn claimed with regard to monads and made it the defining claim of Hyperianism, upon which his entire, insufferable, Woke, New Age, Queer crap about “One and Many” is based. It is a 100% false, and so are all of his laughable “logical” conclusions flowing from it. They are all false, and they are staggeringly dangerous – since they could start wars and provoke tremendous violence. Rebhahn is a totally irresponsible liar and fantasist suffering from incredibly serious delusions.

For anyone who is still baffled by Leibniz’s law, let’s make it as clear as possible.

Imagine you have two different monads.

Leibniz’s law says that the two different monads can NEVER be identical.

Leibniz’s law says that if the two different monads ARE identical then they are not two different monads at all. They are in fact the same monad.

Rebhahn invented a scenario, which he hilariously called “Leibniz’s law” (because he has no fucking clue what this law actually means!), which says the following:

All monads can sometimes be different (Many) and sometimes be identical (One). Ta da!

And that’s the entire fallacious basis of Hyperianism and Rebhahn’s preposterous One and Many nonsense, and his “flower of life” and all that jazz that he keeps blabbering on about.

Now here’s the thing. It’s exactly Rebhahn’s FALLACY that is so important to him. The actual Leibniz’s law doesn’t help Rebhahn in the slightest (it 100% agrees with our position, naturally). It’s Rebhahn’s concocted “Leibniz’s law”, based on a mind-boggling misunderstanding of Leibniz’s law – confusing things being ontologically the same with things being ontologically different but in the same functional state – that is essential to Hyperianism. Without it, Rebhahn’s whole shtick fails and falls. He NEEDS to be able to say we are “One and Many” to defend all his Woke, queer crap – and his laughable, made-up version of Leibniz’s law is the entire basis of this preposterous and totally false claim.

Rebhahn cannot back down and his admit his error, and nor can his cult slaves. They are in this for the duration.

There’s no mystery about why the world groans under the tyranny of Abrahamism, something that has been 100% logically disproven. It’s because stupid people don’t give a fuck about logical disproof! Look at Hyperianism. Not a single Hyperian would be able to follow our total disproof of their belief system. They’re all as dumb as fuck, with not a trace of intellectual integrity or curiosity. So, they just IGNORE the disproof of their faith, exactly as Abrahamists do. They ARE Abrahamists. These people are all the same – blind believers, emotionally invested in nonsense, with their entire identity poured into their idiotic faith. Hyperians don’t believe in Hyperianism because they have the vaguest clue what Leibniz’s law means. They are Hyperians purely because they are queer and this is a queer cult promoting queerness constantly, and constantly attacking the unqueer world.

Rebhahn said,

“This is because, by Leibniz’s Law, when multiple things are identical, they are actually the same thing.”

Multiple things can NEVER be identical! You can’t get two identical monads, yet Rebhahn claims that ALL monads are identical and are an “Identity”. It’s absolute garbage – dreamt up by a man without any clue what Leibniz actually said. We have provided many sources, including Leibniz himself, explaining what Leibniz’s law is actually all about. Rebhahn has not provided even ONE source for his invented version of Leibniz’s law. But never forget that this is a psychopath and malignant liar. He is allergic to the Truth. He always has been. His whole life is a lie. He is a Fake Self suffering from pathological narcissism. But his cult slaves don’t care. They are insane as he is and as ferociously committed to lying as he is. That’s why humanity must deal with these people. They are an astonishing brake on human progress. All of them are fantasists who detest reality.

Leibniz’s law is reality, so Rebhahn simply faked it and invented a totally false version of the law, and then cited it as if it were the actual law rather than just bizarre crap this cretin made up.

Rebhahn said,

“We are a single universal mind that divided itself into a multiplicity of minds by introducing difference.”

All totally false! All absolute garbage. A simply astonishing fallacy.

Rebhahn, bluntly, did not understand what Leibniz meant by “identity”. You cannot have different things involved in an identity. An identity is one thing only! Different ontological minds cannot be in an ontological One Mind, and a functional unity of minds is not an “Identity” … a One Mind, a “single universal mind”!!!

Here is Rebhahn’s incredible error laid bare. Rebhahn said,

“And Leibniz’s law basically says when multiple things are identical they are actually one thing.”

In fact, Leibniz’s law says that when you have “two” things and there is no discernible difference between them then they are actually one thing, i.e., they were NEVER two things. That’s what Rebhahn couldn’t comprehend.

Rebhahn believes that Leibniz’s law says that ACTUALLY different things can be an “identity” whereas Leibniz’s law in fact says that if two “different things” are identical then they are not different things at all. And “identical” here means 100% correspondence across ALL POSSIBLE STATES AND PROPERTIES … for all eternity. There cannot be a single difference at any point, or that would be sufficient to prove that they were NOT identical. With Rebhahn’s joke “system”, monads allegedly become “identical” at some points and then “different” at other times – a total violation of Leibniz’s law.

You couldn’t get a more fundamental misunderstanding of Leibniz’s law. It really would be as dumb as claiming that “identical” twins are one person! They’re not one person because they’re NOT identical. And monads are not one monad because they too are not identical … they’re different monads, and they are always different monads.

Daniel Sollberger said,

“… two things are indistinguishable and in fact one single thing, if everything that truly can be said of the one may be said of the other as well.”

So, Leibniz’s law says that different things cannot be different things if they are identical – they are actually one thing. They are therefore NOT different things! (And never forget that we are talking about all properties and states across all eternity, so that not a single difference is discernible … any difference at all means that two things are not identical).

Rebhahn claims that Leibniz’s law says that different things can be identical and thus actually be one thing. In other words, Rebhahn failed to understand that Leibniz’s law is explicitly saying that different things can NEVER be identical; two things that were identical would ipso facto actually be one thing. Rebhahn thought that Leibniz’s law was saying the exact opposite: that different things can definitely be identical and if they are then they are actually one thing. And this error is the entire basis of Hyperianism! It really is.

Rebhahn said,

“We are this ONE MIND that exercises the capacity to be a multiplicity. We are that One Mind that is experiencing ourselves in diversity. We are One but Many at the same time. … We are in multiplicity nearly all the time. We are in identity only for a moment. The majority of the time we are in multiplicity. When we’re in multiplicity, we’re still a Unity.”

This is classic Rebhahn Word Salad … and absolutely everything he states here is FALSE. Look at some of the idiocy he spouts. He says,

“We are One but Many AT THE SAME TIME”

then immediately contradicts himself by saying

“We are in multiplicity nearly all the time.”

What, you mean we are sometimes NOT in “multiplicity”? In that case, how can we One and Many at the same time? Then he contradicts himself again by saying,

“We are in identity only for a moment.”

So, that means that we are actually MANY most of the time, and only incredibly fleetingly “One”, yet we are told we are “One and Many” at all times. Rebhahn says,

“We are in identity only for a moment”,

then says,

“When we’re in multiplicity, we’re still a Unity.”

You just said we were a Unity/Identity “only for a moment”. Rebhahn contradicts himself from sentence to sentence and even within sentences, and not one of his cult slaves notices, or cares. And this is the whole point of Word Salad. It’s there to disguise the total vacuity of what is being said and pretend that something profound is going on. But absolutely no one is paying attention or is remotely bothered.

Rebhahn said,

“In the beginning we were all in identity and in identity I, we, you, me all – at that point it’s all functionally the same. Functionally. That’s a very important word, a very important caveat.”

Isn’t it hilarious that Rebhahn is trying to escape from his trap by talking about “functionally” rather than “ontologically”? But there is no such thing in Leibniz’s law of manifestly different things being an “identity” and only manifestly different things can be in a functional relationship with each other. An ontological “One Mind” could only ever be in ontological relationship with itself. But Rebhahn, a hair dresser, literally doesn’t understand what any of these concepts mean. And he’s backed up by cretins like the Immense Fatness of Jan, Necrophil, Mad Breeder Bitchell and Mark Wonderpoop – people wholly devoid of intelligence, education and qualifications. You can’t embarrass these people intellectually because they don’t have intellects. They are irrational fanatics, entirely driven by their Woke emotions. Intellectuals would either admit their error or try to defend their position. But not these people. They just keep on repeating their lies and will do so forever, just like Abrahamists!

Rebhahn said,

“We DECIDE to explore ourselves in our diversity and so since we explore ourselves in our diversity we have introduced uniqueness which is introducing difference and we are all now unique perspectives. Instead of having that singular perspective, we all have unique perspectives.”

This is just mindless Woke drivel. Nothing “decides” to do anything. This is a mathematical system and all of its cosmic operations are mathematically mandated. The laughable notion that a decision is taken “to explore ourselves in our diversity” automatically means that a different decision could be taken such as to “explore ourselves in our sameness”, or a decision could be taken to do nothing at all, or to do who the fuck knows what. There is no such decision. The eternal and necessary domain of Being (zero entropy) automatically generates the temporal and contingent domain of Becoming (entropy) and then that new domain automatically sets about trying to eliminate its entropy so that it can return to its Source, but it takes the lifetime of the universe for that to be done.

Rebhahn said,

“This why it’s so important that the world understand this, understand that we are all reflections of each other. We are all One and Many AT THE SAME TIME. We are all One Mind experiencing itself as unique perspectives in diversity.”

Do you see the relentless Word Salad game Rebhahn the hairdresser plays? It’s all pure Woke, queer, New Age rhetoric with zero basis in reality. It’s all PROVABLY false!

Rebhahn said, “People ask are we One Mind or Many Minds. It’s BOTH!”

Yawn. CATEGORY ERROR!

Rebhahn said,

“Reality logically and rationally has the ability to be both at the same time.”

It logically and rationally has no such ability, as we have shown via Leibniz’s law. Do you see that Rebhahn simply asserts that he is using logic and reason while he is fact being totally illogical and irrational?

Rebhahn said,

“It’s not a contradiction.”

It 100% is. PROVABLY. We have already proved it! You can’t say that something is not a contradiction just by saying so. To say that something has two ontological statuses … it’s an individual monad and it’s NOT an individual monad (it’s a Unity/Identity) … is an instant contradiction!

Rebhahn said,

“It’s a logical and rational possibility that actualizes itself.”

It’s not. It’s logically impossible.

Rebhahn said,

“We are an identity that is exploring its functionality of being a multiplicity through introducing difference.”

We’re not. It’s a strict impossibility by the PSR!

Rebhahn said,

“Your individuality is not ontologically destroyed by entering into a state of identity.”

If there were such a thing, it would be. But there is no such thing or state. It’s 100% impossible. You cannot be in a Leibnizian “identity” if you are completely ontologically different from whatever you are falsely claimed to be in “identity” with.

Rebhahn said,

“We are all one and many at the same time.”

We’re not.

Rebhahn said,

“We don’t want to be stuck in DOGMA.”

You are … stuck in insane, Woke, queer dogma with no basis in reality!

Rebhahn said,

“We can err in our reason.”

You do so CONSTANTLY!

Rebhahn said,

“We want this to be an exact science.”

You don’t. You want a queer, Woke worldview and you will tell any lie to spread your completely fallacious queer propaganda. The only that matters to you and your cult slaves is spouting queer nostrums.

Rebhahn said,

“We need to have extreme rigor in our process.”

Go on then, rigorously refute our total disproof of Hyperianism. Ho, ho, ho.

It’s astounding that this fuckwit – spouting Queer Theory – keeps a straight face while he is relentlessly lying. But all experts on malignant narcissists say these people are compulsive liars. They have zero relationship with the Truth, as Rebhahn demonstrates every day. This is one of the most flagrant liars on earth.

Rebhahn said,

“We also have to be self-aware enough to be able to make mistakes and leave room for that possibility also.”

WTF! This guy has zero self-awareness. He has a FALSE SELF.

Hey, you fuckwit, we have proved that your own entire faith is false. Do you know what the chances are of you admitting your proven errors and fallacies? They are precisely ZERO.

Desk said,

“I can only see 35 minutes of this video, wasn’t this originally like 2 hours long?”

The rest of the video is the GRIFT, which is of course the part that actually matters to Rebhahn. The rest is just bait.