The Absurdity: The “Big Bang” According to Morgue Official

We shall repeat once again what Bertrand Russell said,

“A stupid man’s report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand.”

Morgue Official believed he understood ontological mathematics. He even wrote a book on it, basically a cut and paste plagiarism job from books published by Mike Hockney and Dr. Thomas Stark. Rebhahn, we now see, didn’t actually understand this material AT ALL.

We’ll give you a straightforward example, regarding something as fundamental as it gets for understanding reality: the Big Bang.

In ont math, the Big Bang is when the domain of perfect Being (the eternal and necessary domain of perfect basis waves organized monadically) projects a secondary, imperfect domain (of Becoming). This is the spacetime universe of matter; of the temporal, contingent and particular.

The eternal and necessary monads also project temporal and contingent versions of themselves (which endure for the lifetime of the universe, i.e. these projections are extremely long-lived, but not eternal … it’s the base monads that are the eternal and necessary beings – they are in the very truest sense … gods!), and it is these temporal and contingent minds that interact with the temporal and contingent spacetime universe of matter. The eternal and necessary “gods” project the mortal domain but, like Aristotle’s perfect God, they do not interact at all with the world. They are not thinking about it, or reacting to it, or being changed by it. They think of their own divinity, and that’s it. Their projection does its own thing, but is mathematically mandated to “return home”, i.e., the projection MUST reach zero-entropy, which is the same state as Being, i.e., Becoming has been eliminated (we have reached a true Leibnizian state of IDENTITY!) – but that is simply the signal for the next Becoming to begin, via a new Big Bang.

What does Morgue Official claim? Well, all of this ont math was far too complex for that clown to understand – why wouldn’t it be? … this man didn’t even go to school! – and he couldn’t conceive of what was actually taking place. Rebhahn has invented a completely different and totally fallacious version of the Big Bang that has no connection at all to ont math. The concept that completely escaped him was that eternal and necessary monadic minds (“orthogonal” monads, we might say) project temporal and contingent monadic minds (“non-orthogonal” monads, we might say) and that this is a one to one process: one temporal and contingent projection for each eternal and necessary monad. Rebhahn wouldn’t have the vaguest idea what we are talking about here, because he understands ont math not at all.

For Rebhahn, with all of his New Age flower of life baloney, there is no system of eternal and necessary Being projecting a secondary temporal and contingent domain of Becoming. Rather, in Rebhahn’s nonsense system, it is the base monadic minds themselves that ontologically undergo the “Big Bang” (i.e., they aren’t eternal and necessary at all and in fact are temporal and contingent, hence are impossible by virtue of the PSR! … they do not have mandatory existence).

You have all seen Rebhahn’s frantic hand-waving regarding the flower of life supposedly “collapsing” into a “unity/identity” and then “expanding” into a “multiplicity, diversity and particularization”. What Rebhahn is going for is that the base monads themselves are being “Big Banged”, i.e., the base monads are in fact ONE monad (!) – what Rebhahn calls the universal Mind, or One Mind, or Universal Consciousness – and then it ontologically “explodes” (“fractures”). And it does so because, so Rebhahn says, it introduces “difference” into itself (have you noticed that Rebhahn never once attempts an explanation of this – he simply asserts it) and it does so, supposedly, because it’s a “subjectivity” and agency that seems to have a compulsion to “explore diversity, multiplicity and particularization” – because, apparently, it was “bored” or “lonely”, or whatever Woke anthropomorphic nonsense Rebhahn can think of. It seems to be a Woke subjectivity that wants to explore its Wokeness to the maximum by infinitely multiplying itself into infinite “diversity”, and therefore Wokeness is metaphysically mandated (!), and whatever “diversity” Corey Rebhahn and his chums want to explore must be fully accepted, respected and CELEBRATED, and everyone must realize that whatever Corey Rebhahn says is right, and humanity will be completely enlightened and become “hyperaware” when everyone agrees with Corey Rebhahn and “New Terra” (the New Jerusalem) – Woke paradise – will be established.

STOP LAUGHING!

Seriously, this is what Hyperianism now is. Rebhahn delivers his version of this on EVERY deadstream. The whole point is to claim that reality itself is Woke and LOVES diversity and the entire point of existence is to “explore diversity”. Curiously enough, Rebhahn never talks about how infinite diversity – an apparent intrinsic good and no less than the point of existence – ever returns to UNITY/IDENTITY. Why would it? If maximizing diversity, difference, divergence, particularization, and multiplicity is the point of everything then why would existence ever TERMINATE that state?

In ont math, the point of reality could be said to be the exploration of existence in every way (no matter how savage, dark, brutal, horrific – see the dialectic … a system of conflict desperately trying to conclude the conflict, and only succeeding when ultimate synthesis is accomplished at the Omega Point (zero entropy)). There are two modes to be explored: 1) the eternal and necessary (Being), and 2) the temporal and contingent (Becoming). The first state lasts forever, and the second cycles on forever via a never-ending succession of universes, all contained with the “container” of Being. This is thus a system that never stops exploring itself. Being contemplates itself as an immutable eternity – wow what a perspective that is! And Becoming contemplates itself as a mutable temporality. It operates via two basic game theory strategies: 1) competition (diversity) and 2) cooperation (sameness!). (And in particle physics this would be fermions versus bosons!)

Competition produces conflict but also powers the system initially, and it takes people an extremely long time for the emphasis to switch to cooperation (ending individualistic diversity!), and cooperation then drives the system to its completion at zero entropy (PERFECT cooperation – we all VALUE each other equally and have become a community of gods and a society of the divine, the perfect round table! – you can’t say fairer than that! If you think about it, the PSR must conclude the universe with a “communism of the gods” because there could never be a sufficient reason to privilege any monad over any other).

Rebhahn’s Hyperianism actually opposes all of this. Rebhahn’s “diversity” is exactly what the ont math system must overcome! Rebhahn says in effect that maximum diversity is the ideal state, but in that case how could the system EVER return to unity/identity? For Rebhahn, the return to unity/diversity could only ever be HELLISH … because it would be driven by cooperation, sameness, collectivism, communitarianism, communism, the General Will, convergence, conformity, and so on … absolutely everything Rebhahn detests and rails against. Rebhahn is the DEVIL trying to prevent God reconstructing itself!

Don’t you find it simply mind-boggling that Rebhahn goes on about “unity exploring diversity” but goes nowhere near the other half of the equation to bring about balance, namely … DIVERSITY EXPLORING UNITY, i.e., overcoming its diversity! That’s no good at all to Rebhahn, that is not supportive at all of Wokeness, and so Rebhahn simply ignores it! His is a system that only works in one direction … towards maximum Wokeness via maximum diversity. There is no return path, no way back home, no unification process.

Rebhahn’s “Big Bang” is an explosion of “One Mind” into “Many Minds” … and that’s it. Because Rebhahn asserts that nothing could be better than the Many Minds exploring their diversity to the maximum … so unity is inherently impossible because it contradicts the supposed point of the system: to be maximally diverse and explore diversity maximally.

Rebhahn never talks about how Unity is achieved through Disunity (diversity!). This is yet another of his many category errors. Rebhahn is so dumb that in all probability he imagines maximum Wokeness (maximum diversity) to be the maximally enlightened state and somehow all the totally diverse minds say,

“You know what, why not forget all this diversity – the very point of existence – and become a unity/identity, the total opposite of the point of existence?”

Well, don’t ask us to explain this mad shit. That’s mad Rebhahn’s mad job!

By the way folks, we want to make an absolutely key point. Ontological mathematics is OUR intellectual property. That does not of course mean that we own existence, as some retarded Hyperian trolls say we are claiming. It does mean that we own THIS answer to existence and we assert that THIS answer to existence is THE answer to existence, i.e., our assertion is very straightforward: we have discovered what reality is and how it operates and, of course, that discovery can happen ONLY ONCE, so, by definition, anyone who agrees with this answer is agreeing with us and OUR discovery.

Now consider this. Corey Rebhahn claims to be an “independent researcher” in ont math – although he got EVERYTHING from Mike Hockney, Dr. Thomas Stark and other AC/PI authors, and was a himself once a prominent online Illuminist, which is how came to our attention in the first place. But look at Rebhahn’s “answer” to existence, which he claims is compatible with ont math. We have shown how it is TOTALLY FALSE and has no connection at all to ont math. This totally wrong answer by Rebhahn is now HIS intellectual property and he’s welcome to it since it’s mindless garbage. We are giving him full “credit” … for being absolutely wrong! So the fact that someone claims to base everything on math and to give an ont math answer to existence does not make it CORRECT. What’s the point of a provably wrong answer? It has no point at all. Hyperianism is PROVABLY FALSE, the disproof being furnished by none other than true Ont Math!

So, we discovered the right answer to existence, and that’s an end of it. Anyone who supports OUR answer must acknowledge that we are those who discovered this answer. Corey Rebhahn makes no reference at all to how, specifically, he arrived at a mathematical conception of reality and why he has a book entitled “Ontological Mathematics”. Where on earth did he get this title from? Did he just think it up one fine day … or has he STOLEN it from those who actually introduced it to the world? Hmmmmm.

The exact reason why we can DESTROY Rebhahn’s Hyperianism is that he is using OUR system, the system he plagiarized from us (he absolutely never acknowledges that Hyperianism is wholly derived from Illuminism, and was then hideously misunderstood, misinterpreted and misrepresented by him) and so we can use OUR system to refute all of HIS false claims regarding it.

Everyone should grasp that merely agreeing that “everything is math” does not mean that you have arrived at the answer to existence. How and why “everything is math” is the issue. That’s what ont math is all about. Corey Rebhahn sort of agrees that everything is math, but he, like Immensely Fat Jan, often talks about some sort of non-mathematical aspect to existence concerning subjective experiences. In fact, all of these experiences are themselves mathematical. Math explains EVERYTHING via mathematical syntax (form) and mathematical semantics (content). That’s the whole point.

But what Rebhahn now claims in relation to ont math is 100% provably false. So, ont math is definitely NOT the answer to existence if you totally fuck it up, as Rebhahn has done. He is not doing any ont math at all. He just pretends to … to give his mad Woke fuckwittery some semblance of importance and gravitas. Hyperians are welcome to their entirely false “answer” to existence – that wrong answer is now Rebhahn’s intellectual property (not that anyone would want to own the wrong answer!) – but they cannot ever claim that this “answer” has any connection to ont math. It doesn’t. We, the people who gave the world this answer, have used ont math to disprove Hyperianism, just as we can use it to disprove any other attempted answer to existence. Why can we do this? Because ont math is the actual, the one and only, answer to existence, hence it logically follows that it can refute the infinite lies that humans invent to oppose it.

Hyperianism is just one more false “answer”, invented by a Woke maniac who knows nothing about math, philosophy or science. The fact that the basic system was stolen from us is becoming less and less relevant. We are constantly placing more and more distance between the Illuminist Truth and the Hyperian Lie. Eventually, the whole world will laugh if Rebhahn and his Hyperians cult slaves make any reference to ont math, or even mathematical idealism and rationalism (which is predicated on ont math).

Glad we sorted that out.

By the way, Rebhahn believes that at the Big Bang, the “One Mind” ontologically scrambles all of its basis sinusoids and these scrambled sinusoids give rise to all of the “particular” monadic minds. This is impossible on several levels – we have explained this in detail in previous posts – but we want you to know that Rebhahn has no idea at all that no basis sinusoids EVER become scrambled. The basis sinusoids are eternal and necessary. It’s their temporal and contingent mathematical combinations that are “scrambled”, so to speak. Rebhahn imagines basis waves somehow moving around, like scientific “strings”. They don’t. They are net-zero singularities in a Singularity and they don’t move anywhere. What they do mathematically is enter a combination, or exit a combination. That’s it. This is not any kind of physical process. It is 100% mathematical. It’s a universal system of compossible wavefunctions. Just think of your own thoughts. Each “thought” is a wavefunction and is made of basis waves, and your next thought removes some basis waves from the “thought wavefunction” and adds different ones, and so you can keep thinking different thoughts forever simply by adding and subtracting basis waves to/from the continuously changing thought wavefunction. Isn’t it AMAZING? But incredibly hard to really conceive because it’s unlike any physical process.

Hoël Kinsella said,

“The funny thing is Morgue’s version of ontological mathematics didn’t even explain the PSR’s justification right. Also, he says the omega point is a single monad and not a collective Monad. So Hyperianism itself has very very little truth content if not none. Morgue has fabricated an emotionally resonant narrative where the PI have created a rational narrative; that’s why only extreme feeling types remain and are locked in by the feelings morgue gives them. Cultists get addicted to their messiah’s love bombing so their subconscious must swat away any opportunity to see morgue for who he really is; A mediocre conman, plagiarist, grift, sociopathic, narcissistic midwit, 2002 edge lord.”

Yup!

Rebhahn deliberately took rationalist Illuminism, and thought,

“How can I convert this into a system that highly emotional, “intuitive”, “artistic” women – the ones who will give me enormous narcissistic supply and heaps of money – will love?” And today’s Hyperianism is the outcome. The signature Hyperian followers are women like Mad Breeder Bitchell, Kassidy, and Dyslexic Fairy, people who are literally incapable of manifesting any intelligence. Breeder Bitchell emotionally detested Illuminism from the get-go and continuously encouraged Rebhahn to get away from it, and he was more than keen to obey “mom” and pretend that ont mat was his and there was no such thing as Illuminism! Being a malignant narcissist, he actually believed he could get away with it. He still does!

Sanja Jan said,

“The true part of Hyperianism is the part that was stolen from Illuminists. Because that part looks true to people, they think everything about the system Morgue recreated is good and right. They’re stuck on Hyperianism because of the true part which is ontological mathematics. But the biggest lie you tell, the easier it’s going to be believed. So Morgue took some part of truth by Illuminists and added some lies. His whole system depends on Illuminism…and when truth seekers awake to the fact that they were attracted to Hyperianism because of the truth it was based on …and not because of whatever Morgue added to it…they will be able to walk away from Morgue. If they will want to. I think people who like Morgue are mostly truth seekers because if they’re attracted to the part of Hyperianism Morgue stole, that means they long for the truth. A liar would tell you one big truth, and small lies. But because of the big truth he won’t be doubted. Be careful Hyperians.”

This is a very interesting point. Rebhahn was desperate to work with us so that he could use ont math, which, he knew, would legitimize everything he said. Without ont math, who would take Hyperianism seriously? It would just be some weirdo in makeup on social media spouting New Age stuff, and there are countless people like that, and they’re much better than Rebhahn. Teal Swan is surely far superior on that front to Rebhahn (Teal Swan even spoke out against Wokeness – 100 bonus points!). Even Arden Leigh is better.

The issue was raised of “truth seekers”. We don’t consider Hyperians to be truth seekers at all. An actual truth seeker goes wherever the truth points. They don’t start out knowing what the destination is. They will reach the destination mandated by Truth, and that’s a long and demanding process because the Truth is the most alien thing there is. Humans are much more comfortable with lies – because lies are human! The Truth isn’t.

Why don’t people like math? It’s because it’s the most alien subject you can get. It’s actually the language of truth and the ontology of Truth, hence average humans are extremely alienated from it. They didn’t evolve with “organs for truth”. They didn’t evolve as a “truth” species but as a “survival and reproduction” species, a completely different thing, often assisted by UNTRUTH, as Nietzsche pointed out.

Hyperians aren’t truth seekers. They are people who already know their destination before they ever get to it, i.e., the destination is what they want and insist upon, and so that’s the destination they are going to reach. And that means these people will NEVER arrive at the truth. They are definitely going to arrive at THEIR LIE. And they always do.

So, Hyperians are defined by their Wokeness, not by any interest in philosophy, mathematics and science. Hyperians are defined by their feelings, not by their thinking, so the only destination they will ever arrive at is one that satisfies their FEELINGS. And the only thing that satisfies feelings is THE LIE.

The TRUTH is the terminus of THINKING. Feelings always terminate with lies. Why? Because lies are human and are designed to target feelings. Why are people Abrahamists? Because “God” makes emotional sense to them and is what they emotionally want to believe. Eastern mystics believe in the Oneness, the Cosmic consciousness, the non-duality, the Tao, or whatever. Again, it’s all about emotion, emotional connection.

No emotional person is capable of reaching the Truth because the Truth speaks to intellect and not to emotion, and it provides no sustenance for feelings, so feeling types don’t want it. They reject it. Feeling types are lie magnets. They attract all possible lies. They never attract the truth. They cannot. Hegel said that hardly anyone could reach the philosophical, conceptual truth of existence. Most people would reach the “truth” only at a much simpler level, that of art or religion (which were types of “picture-thinking”). We have always been fascinated by this idea: a multi-tiered truth based on people’s intelligence. Hegel, charitably, claimed that art, religion and philosophy were giving three different takes on the one Truth. A nice idea, but completely false. There is only One Truth, and if you’re not signed up to it then you are participating in the infinite human lies. The mainstream Christian religion gets nowhere near giving any sort of Hegelian worldview. Similarly, you could nowadays NEVER reach Illuminism from Hyperianism, even though Hyperianism was once designed to be the public face of Illuminism!

No Hyperian could ever reach the conclusion that reality hates Woke people, so they would never accept reality if the answer to reality said that reality is foundationally unWoke and even anti-Woke. They would choose a Woke fantasy instead. They did – Hyperianism!

Reality isn’t emotional and doesn’t love or hate anything. It’s humans who add the love and hate. Humans are part of reality of course, but they are not reality in itself. They are creatures produced by reality, on a long journey to understand reality, and along that journey feeling types will have to learn the hardest lesson of all … that they MUST abandon their feelings if they want to access TRUTH. Hyperians never would. Their emotional beliefs always come first and they accept only those “truths” which support their emotional beliefs, concerning Wokeness, diversity, veganism, pacificism, and all that jazz. They are human, all too human, to use the title of one of Nietzsche’s early books.

More from Rebhahn’s even crazier alter ego, deathbycrimson…

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“I ran downstairs crying. when mother asked me what was wrong, I told her I had sex with the cat.”

[Trust me, it’s a long story…]

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“I’m fucking done… I’m too pissed to continue with this. Morbidly yours, Morgue.”

[Don’t you find it funny that “morbidly yours” was replaced by “ad astra”? What about “morbidly astra”?]

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“Dear Hollywood, I win. Fuck you. Morgue.”

[Er, says the guy who … LIVES IN HOLLYWOOD! Methinks Hollywood won hands-down.]

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“Life is like a carousel. Jump off.”

[Go for it, mate! The sooner the better.]

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“I have a game that we could play. It’s pieces made from blood and clay. You roll the dice to choose your place and take your life to end this race. I have a lie that I could tell. You’ll never die. And end this hell. Divinely wrought from deadly spit. The weak are taught their wrists to slit. Don’t let them beg, don’t let them cry. We want them dead. We’ll watch them die.”

[Does this guy ever fucking shut up? Please make it stop!]

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“rant … honestly, nothing bothers me more than someone posting suicidal shit on facebook.”

[Yeah, you prefer the homicidal shit. We get it.]

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“My nephew is watching Shrek and my cousin comes over and says, ‘Shrek fucked me in the butt. And now my ass won’t stop bleeding.” I hate my family sometimes.”

[Whatever.]

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“I’m fucking tired of getting told that I’m faking it because there are honest to god humans out there that think faking a serious mental illness, that causes people to kill themselves, is somehow fun or will give them attention.”

[Fake! Mate, you’re faking it that you DON’T have incredibly serious mental illness. You’re a fucking LUNATIC. You’re so mentally ill, you ought to be behind bars. Go see a psychiatrist. Show them the Daily Whistle. Get a formal diagnosis of yourself as a malignant narcissist.]

Er, what was that about “Sexy Grandma”? At last, that fucking story is finished! Phew. There is a God! Next up … the horror of “Love Sucks”. It’s you that sucks, mate!