BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON THE DANGEROUS CULT OF HYPERIANISM
• FROM THE CITIZEN JOURNALISTS OF THE AC •
So, we are about to start editing and formatting all of the “Hyperian Movie” submissions – we aim to publish the book by the end of the month.
As we contemplated the new Hyperian Movie, we decided to go back and investigate the old Hyperian Movie from 2018. How did that whole project start?
On 2 Jan 2018, Rebhahn said:
Hello, I hope you had an excellent New Years Eve. Looking forward to a year of success and expansion.
So here’s an update. The problem we currently have is the information is very scattered. I can get attention and reach the masses and make this popular and cool.
The issue is that once I do get their attention, there has to be a powerful place to send them, to direct them.
So I am working on a 90 minute to 2 hour intro video that will give the major points of Hyperianism and bring in our new mythos that will be featured prominently on the website.
I finished the first draft this morning. I am having two individuals review it. The first is an ENTJ that *loves* mythos and understands through symbols and metaphors. She has a hard time understanding math/philosophy. She really wants to help our cause and understand and is trying her best. This is probably the most common type of personality we have to deal with that would be receptive to us.
The second is my brother. He is an INTJ, extremely intelligent, going to Rensselaer for computer science, and very open minded. The exact type of person that we *want* in our cause, unfortunately very rare.
I am going to catalogue their responses, and any confusions or suggestions they have, to dialectically produce something that would ideally appeal to both types.
But I am having trouble introducing the mythos. I have done so to a decent degree and have hit all the major point but it feels a little bare bones. Would you be able to help me with this script? With this portion and in general?
This is going to be a critically important video, and I intend to spend a lot of time editing it and dropping a lot of money for high quality video clips to accompany it. So I really want to get it right.
I’d like to submit the draft to you, along with the responses of the two individuals I mentioned sometime tomorrow night or weds evening by the latest. Ideally I’d begin filming mid next week.
Let me know if you could help with this, I’d greatly appreciate it.
—————————
So, Rebhahn’s half-brother knows exactly what Rebhahn is up to, as does his cop dad and his stepmother. None of these people is innocent. They are up to their neck in this. It’s extremely likely that Rebhahn’s cop dad was highly involved with the false and malicious IC3 complaint that Rebhahn sent to the FBI.
And who is this “ENTJ” woman? Anyone know?
Anyhoo, Rebhahn sent us a first draft of the script and here’s how we replied (diplomatically):
==========
There’s something of a problem regarding how you conceive of the Source which might require a bit of a debate. Have a look at the supplemented version of your document (attached) and see what you think.
To explain the concept exactly is very hard to do within the context of your document.
To give you some idea of the problem, you repeatedly refer to the “fractured Source”. But the Source in itself – as pure noumenon – is never fractured. The Source contains the eternal, immutable, necessary basis waves. These cannot change under any circumstances, so in what way can it be said that the Source has fractured? It’s much easier to assign any fracturing and asymmetry to the Holos. Failing that, a careful distinction has to be drawn between the Source as Noumenon and the Source as Phenomenon.
Imagine a video game. The source language never changes. What changes is how the source language is applied. So, the Source, as the repository of the source language, cannot be fractured. Its application can be fractured, but that is what the Holos is all about. The Source in itself is unfractured, the Holos is fractured, and the temporal relation of minds to the Holos is fractured, but the eternal aspect of minds is not fractured at all, and cannot be. So, “fractured Source” is a problematic term.
Schopenhauer spoke of a single Will existing outside space and time. He said that this became splintered by space and time, thus generating a myriad of individual phenomenal wills. The existence of the many phenomenal wills does not change the existence of the single noumenal will. So, the noumenal will is not “fractured”. What is fractured is the phenomenal expression of the noumenal will. Similarly, the Source itself is not fractured. What is fractured is its phenomenal expression, which is reliant on the Holos.
Think of monads as pianos. The piano keys – the frequencies – never change. What changes is how the piano is played. How do you present Source fracturing in these terms?
We might as well try to make this video/document a pretty definitive introduction so that you can refer any newbies to it straight away … and shut them up because they will see that is a very challenging system that does not suffer fools gladly and does not encourage facile enquiries.
“If you could figure out a way for me to speak about the Watcher/myself that would be great” … we have made a suggestion at the foot of the attached document regarding how this should be handled.
============
So, right from the beginning, Rebhahn never understood ont math. He always did have a catastrophically wrong grasp of the Source (Being) and the universe it generated (Becoming), and this got worse as the years went by, until he now spouts insane gibberish regarding the Source.
The reason why the final movie was fine was that we massively rewrote the script and DOUBLED its size. Rebhahn was responsible for most of the “fluffy” stuff, while we handled all the technical material.
Hyperianism became the joke it is today because Rebhahn of course no longer has us around to correct his incredible errors!
Anyway, here is Rebhahn’s rather revealing reply:
Okay now as far at the fractured Source, yes I completely agree with you [Our note – he never did … he NEVER understood what the Source is, and STILL doesn’t – he literally has no idea.] But here is what is on my mind: People are incredibly stupid. So what I am trying to do is simplify things as much as possible. So when I refer to Source, I am using it as an all encompassing term to refer to: Mathematics, the singularity, frequency, noumena, all reality, all depending on the context and/or the qualifiers.
I know we would be lumping multiple concepts under the word “Source”, but what I’m trying to do is create a simplified “exoteric” version where all people have to do is know two words: “Source” and “Holos” and in the simplified conception, one being ultimate reality, the other being an “illusion”, because unfortunately the vast majority of the public don’t care about the details.
========
So, there you go, all you hyperaware World Shaping Hyperians – Rebhahn himself says that he thinks you are “incredibly stupid” and openly says that he knows that you “don’t care at all about the details”.
Well, for once, Rebhahn is right on both points. But, hey, how are you freaks ever going to learn if your “teacher” thinks you’re as dumb as fuck and deliberately teaches you simplified, “exoteric” nonsense? When has even one of you ever said to Rebhahn, “Why don’t you teach the actual truth (he has no idea what the truth is, but let’s pretend) – and not just simplified junk because you think we’re too stupid for the hard stuff?” Ho, ho, ho. Can you imagine Dyslexic Fairy and Kassidy trying to grasp ont math, the APEX intellectual subject – the most conceptually difficult set of ideas EVER!
Rebhahn said, “The reason I’m trying to do it this way is because OM is so immensely complex that people have no idea what it is. They’re completely lost. I don’t think it is going to help the general public by going into more and more detail, but rather simplifying it. So rather than thinking of Source and Holos as completely and totally rigorously defined separate concepts, they are more general and loose. Similar to how lucifer and satan are more general concepts but can be defined better if necessary.
But the way you explained it in the revisions works perfectly for this script.
What do you think?
==========
Well, we didn’t actually care what Rebhahn thought. Our revised script was fine. It was straightforward, not overly complex, and communicated the basic concepts with reasonable accuracy. Our books of course provide a far more detailed treatment.
For us, the task in the movie was to provide a simplified but not inaccurate version of ont math to the public. As for Rebhahn, not only does he not grasp ont math, he doesn’t even think that accuracy is important. He just wants to tell a “simple story” that stupid people can grasp, and that’s EXACTLY what Hyperianism now is … a total joke of a system, full of fallacies. But Rebhahn knows that none of his dumb cult slaves cares, and he’s fucking 100% right about that – we say this all the time! They have no interest in this material at all. They just want Rebhahn to tell them a Woke story and assure them that they are “hyperaware World Shapers”.
Rebhahn said (given that we had doubled the size of the script and made it much more technical), “The revisions are great, again I’m always appreciative of your help and support. My only concern is that this is an overload of information. I have sent the revised script to three people of widely varying personality types and am going to see what they think.
“Here are the two options I’m considering, either I will:
“A. Keep the script more or less like how you provided it, with a few little adjustments here or there.
“B. Keep the script more or less like the previous original version and end it (doing this would allow me to have more video imagery placed closer together as well, which would keep people’s attention, rather than long spaces of me talking to the camera with no imagery). Then place all of the extra information you provided afterwards, combined with the faq section, to create a separate part of the video that goes into more technical detail.
“C. A mix of A and B, (reduce the main video some but not completely, placing the omitted portions at the end).
Personally I’m back and forth between these options. I’m going to wait until I have everyone’s feedback before deciding on one, but I’m leaning towards C. The more mythos oriented person I mentioned just got back to me and said she personally prefers option A but feels the general public might prefer option B or C. Susan is going over it now, and the more logos oriented person will go over it tomorrow.
“Let me know what you think about all of this. I’ll be working on this over the next couple of days with the goal of filming sometime this week.”
—–
We said, “Re: ‘My only concern is that this is an overload of information.’ – Yes, there is that danger, but it’s also good to be able to refer people to a single detailed account and let them sink or swim. Also, this material will intellectually intimidate the trolls who are always trying to put you down on the basis of your image. Isn’t the main idea behind this to put out a fairly comprehensive explanation of OM and Hyperianism so that you can say to anyone, ‘If you need more detail, go and watch this video.’ There’s a tension between trying to make it simple and also trying to make it comprehensive. Is it there to sell Hyperianism, or to defend Hyperianism when people try to troll Hyperianism?”
A few days later, Rebhahn said, “Sorry about the delay. I had to make a lot of adjustments according to suggestions from the test individuals.
“Both individuals really liked the script and thought it was a great intro to Hyperianism.
“The more Mythos oriented individual recommended I add a description of the double slit experiment, as she said she wouldn’t have believed Hyperianism until she was aware of that experiment.
“The more Logos oriented individual (ironically) was really interested in the Watcher that has incarnated (myself). He said that should be elaborated, and that it will really intrigue people.
“Of course, this is extremely difficult for me to do, as it’s hard for me to talk about myself.
“Some of the Mythos sections could perhaps be filled out a little, and given some more meat. If you could figure out a way for me to speak about the Watcher/myself that would be great, but I realize that’s really hard, so no problems there if not.
“If you don’t mind checking the FAQ as well, and making sure I didn’t make any mistakes with regard to Godel and QM.
“Towards the end of the video, I am going to add in the already filmed New World Order video during the editing phase. I have indicated where I will add it. I’ve attached the NWO script as well just as a reminder of its content. [The NWO script was an earlier script by us.]
Oh! I forgot to mention. I think the female Watcher is fucking brilliant. Adding a potential love story will be incredibly alluring, and it fits all my social media posts about searching beyond time and space for a lost love. I have to get to working on the script but definitely excellent, and I’d love to discuss this more and figure out an even more effective way to get this out.
We said, “The combination of male and female Watchers provides the male and female poles by which we can reach a synthesis fair to both men and women that defeats the masculine patriarchy (negative pole) and the feminine matriarchy (positive pole), and allows a higher synthesis of male and female attributes in society. When we introduce Mythos material in general, it might be a good idea to present it with a different signature, i.e. ethereal and dreamy rather than direct to camera, and often using voices other than yours (so that you can be talked about in the third person).
Rebhahn said, “I’ve kept the content of the script essentially the same except that I’ve moved a large portion of information to the ending section of the video.
“When speaking about the ‘God level’ of the game I added a sentence about love: ‘The purpose of Hyperianism is to elevate you to the next level so that you can begin to consciously play the game. Your task, if you did but know it, is to reach the God level of the game. Your journey to this level of the game culminates in the realization of your limitless power and becoming god as well as guaranteeing that you’ll find your perfect love.’ Unfortunately we don’t have much of an appeal to women in this video, but hopefully that sentence helps a bit.”
Yes, you need to keep your harem of dummies sweet, don’t you, Rebhahn?!
By the way, folks, do you remember when Rebhahn said that the Hyperboreans were Nazis and anyone who talks about Hyperborea is a Nazi?!
Well, here’s what Porgy said in the Hyperian movie:
“They created a brilliant civilization where the people lived and learned together. They explored love, sex, art and music, and advanced quickly in their knowledge of mathematics and the Source. But their society, our magnificent beacon of Hyperborea, was destroyed by the negatives. Thus, to survive, the Synths were forced to fracture and exist in hidden groups and secret societies. … Through his writing, Nietzsche’s unconscious knowledge of what he was flowed onto the pages: “Let us face ourselves. We are Hyperboreans; we know very well how far off we live. ‘Neither by land nor by sea will you find the way to the Hyperboreans’ — Pindar already knew this about us. Beyond the north, ice, and death — our life, our happiness. We have discovered happiness, we know the way, we have found the exit out of the labyrinth of thousands of years. Who else has found it?”
….
[Next is a section from the “Watcher” section within the movie (scripted by us – very regrettably, in hindsight!):]
Everyone wanted to be part of the realm of crystal miracles. This was Hyperborea, which some called Atlantis. But when the twelfth hour struck for the twelfth time, the law of sacred numbers demanded an apocalypse to celebrate the arrival of the magical gross. Hyperborea fell and hell was built in its place.
Morgue is here to crash the infernal system that now prevails. He is here to reboot the world, to restore the Hyperborean paradise. He is here to lead the Revenants, to inspire them, to help them remember their true selves, to direct their awesome energy and spirit.
Join the sacred cause of Hyperianism … the mission to transform humanity into a free, fully-optimized species, a divine species, a community of the sacred, a society of gods and goddesses, a HyperHumanity of Sourcers who have mastered the Source Code of Reality through the use of the highest reason and logic. Is that not the true definition of “God”?
Join us. Free yourself and free the world. Make yourself what you are destined to become. Make it happen now. Join the Free Spirits, the Wanderers, Revenants and Sourcers, those who will build the New World Order where the people rule rather than the greedy selfish rich elites and the crazy peddlers of ancient religious superstitions.
If you want the world to change, you need to make your contribution. You can’t expect others to do it for you.
——–
So, either Rebhahn was a NAZI when he made the Hyperian (Hyperborean) movie, or he’s LYING now by accusing us of being Nazis because we refer to Hyperborea. Which is it, all you dumbfuck Hyperians?
By the way, Hyperianism is practically named after Hyperborea! Here’s Rebhahn’s full message to us when he first mentioned the term “Hyperianism”:
Your video scripts are excellent! This is most helpful. This is packed with information. I wont know for sure until I begin working on this but it seems to me there is enough info here for 5 videos if not more. My goal is to make sure this information is understood and viewed. What I would like to do, is use this information as jumping off points, and to work with it and put it into a form that the public can easily understand and will also be compatible with their extraordinarily short attention spans. I am already seeing a few paragraphs that are so dense with information that I could expound upon them into their own videos. So I may select a few paragraphs, add information, details, metaphors, alter wording etc. into its own video. I would also like to let a few of my trusted members know what is going on (that those involved with the AC are helping us with information) and have them view this information to help me put it together in the most optimized way. Is all of this acceptable? If so, would you like to be made aware of the alterations or see a draft?
I may also have to be generic and not reference Muslims directly. This is because doing so could potentially get me fired. Lucifer is also a topic that will put me at risk, as well as Illuminati and NWO. As soon as I am able to be totally financially independent this will no longer be a restriction.
I love the idea of uniforms and a distinct look. I will give this thought. I could possibly speak with https://majestyblack.com Though they are Thelemites and I am very hesitant because of this. I am heavily leaning towards the name Hyperrationalism, and I have purchased the domain hyperrationalism.com. I think it fits well and sounds authoritative. A shortened version that I like a lot could be Hyperianism. “I am a Hyperian” It has the feel of transcendence. Hyperborea (or possibly, Hyperia?) also fits well into a promised land scheme.
Another domain name I am considering is ExitRealityNow.com I think it is catchy and tempting to click on, though in the long run Hyperrationalism.com will be taken much more seriously.
This new site will be a complete redesign with a new aesthetic to make everything more modern . It will *heavily* utilize my cult of personality, and also heavily emphasize Dionysian elements. It will also be emphasizing The Three Paths: The Path of Shadow, The Path of Intuition, and The Path of Reason. I’ve begun writing a new book that will be all about this. This is in an effort to condense key points into a very simplistic and easy to remember scheme. Tentatively the book will be titled: “The Path of Shadow: The Dark Way to Enlightenment through Sex, Love, and Reason” The goal is to get people from Shadow to Reason.
I am attaching a few photos that will possibly be used on the website to give you a feel for the aesthetic.
I know I’m making this a lot about “me”, but it has been by *far* the most effective tactic for appealing to many people.
The main message of the site would be something like: “Hyperrationalism shows that reality is 100% logical, rational, and mathematical. This guarantees that you are not a body but you are a Mind that is eternal and indestructible. Each one of us is an eternal Mind of infinite potential and together we form One system which is the Universe experiencing itself.”
——–
So, all you Hyperians, you are HYPERBOREAN NAZIS!
Here’s a radical idea – why don’t you Hyperian cult slaves ask, on one of your cult god’s deadstreams, if he and all of you are NAZIS! Ask him why he was once so heavily into HYPERBOREA (Nazi paradise, apparently!).
Porgy is a compulsive liar. His last deadstream was entitled: “Christians WON… I’m Coming Back to Christianity…”
WTF!
Rebhahn is simply a Queer Christian, a Queer Gnostic Christian, to be more exact.
On April 3 2018, Porgy said, “Fantastic! Thank you, this is very much appreciated and your video scripts are the perfect length. I think this is going to end up working very well. April is devoted to releasing the Hyperian movie and then I will begin weekly video releases again. So I will be filming these scripts in April but they will be released weekly beginning in May. I’ll need to film another set for June sometime in early may. Is that acceptable?
By the way, I think the mythos elements we have added are going to work quite well. I haven’t released the Hyperian movie yet, but the Revenant/Watcher portion is available to those on patreon and people have already begun to show excitement. The more elements like this the more people will get excited. I want to play this out in the real world, a living mythos, that people can watch unfold and be a part of. The ultimate immersive experience.
Our reply was:
We’ll send you four scripts by the end of each month. The next four will be with you by the end of April.
Re: “I want to play this out in the real world, a living mythos, that people can watch unfold and be a part of. The ultimate immersive experience.” – Yes, that’s exactly what we need to aim for. But that means you will have to look for someone to play the part of the female Watcher. And we will also have to invent evil Watchers that are trying to thwart us, and so on. We need to tell a gripping story played out in real life that gets everyone emotionally on board, and gets them involved in real life events. It’s a big challenge!
Rebhahn said:
Fantastic!
I am almost positive I found the perfect person for the female Watcher. I’ve been working with her for a few months. This will take a little time, but if it all works out, it will be extremely powerful. I live near Devil’s Gate Dam (Crowley called it a portal to hell) right across from Jack Parson’s lab where Crowley did some rituals. I could create some kind of initiation ceremony with her there. I’m looking forward to actualizing all of this. This is the key to getting people fired up and engaged.
Quick question. As you know, I used to think that positive sinusoids had to be balanced with negative sinusoids to net to zero. I now understand that a sinusoid itself already nets to zero over one full cycle. At that point, my reasoning for a monad being indivisible, was that any removal or addition of energy would result in net energy and hence violate the requirement of net zero. I now know this reasoning for indivisibility is incorrect. Is the correct reasoning that, since a monad is a full set of mathematics, it can’t possibly be divided because that would lead to inconsistencies and incompleteness? Or is it simply because a monad is a singularity and obviously you cannot divide a singularity?
We said:
Re Devil’s Gate Dam – great. You could do some outdoor filming in that area since it’s so scenic and atmospheric.
Re the indivisible monad – a monad can’t possibly be divided because that would contradict its definition. The definition of a monad, as per its formula, is that it intrinsically includes all possible valid sinusoids (frequencies). No valid frequencies can be excluded. It is thus an autonomous expression of all of ontological mathematics. It is surrounded by a myriad of monads of exactly the same nature, and thus it mathematically interacts with these.
It’s vital to distinguish between monad as “being” and monad as “becoming”. As being, a monad is forever the same: a set of eternal, immutable, perfect, basis sinusoids, equivalent to Platonic Forms. However, such a system automatically starts combining these basis waves and in doing so creates the world of becoming. So, the system has two components: 1) necessary basis waves (being), and 2) contingent combinations of basis waves (becoming). That’s the whole of existence: being and becoming, with the latter being derived from the former, and the latter being dialectical and the former not. As soon as you have basis waves, you immediately have the capacity to create contingent combinations of these basis waves and that’s what produces the spacetime world of matter that we experience. The system is the simplest possible. One might loosely consider it in terms of Lego bricks. Imagine eternal Lego bricks that automatically start combining with each other, and then pulling each other apart and entering into new combinations. Then give them a dialectical nature so that they are attempting to produce the perfect Lego pattern (which is that of perfect order = zero entropy).
In Atomism, the atoms are the Lego bricks but the atoms are themselves made of more basic bricks, and we never reach any foundational layer. With monads and their sinusoids, we do.
Here are a few random suggestions for naming the first part of the Hyperian movie…
Hyperianism: The Unconquerable Will
Hyperianism: The First Disobedience
Hyperianism: Interdicted Knowledge
Hyperianism: The New World Order
Hyperianism: Rebooting the World
Hyperianism: The Science of the Future
The Hyperians: The Assassins of God
Hyperianism: Revealing the Source Code
Hyperianism: Involution and Evolution
The Hyperians: Heaven’s Fugitives
A 3.5 hour video may be too much for some people. Two videos may work better. Anyone who watches the 2.5 hour video will certainly then watch the 1 hour video.
Conceivably some might watch the 1 hour video first if you give it an intriguing title.
Maybe you could call the second video something like “Think Again: How Hyperian Rationalism Refutes Empirical Scientism”
In fact, you could even arguably split the 2.5 hour video into a 1.5 and 1 hr videos. The 1 hour video would accommodate everything about Wanderers, Revenants, New World Order. Maybe you could call it The Rise of the Revenants.
1) Hyperianism: The Revaluation of all Values
2) The Rise of the Revenants: Making Earth a Freedom Planet Rather Than Prison Planet
3) Think Again: How Hyperian Rationalism Refutes Empirical Scientism
At 3.11.07 Did you say that unperceived things CAN exist?
Berkeley’s position is the exact opposite: there are no
unperceived things.
You might think of separating the Q&A section from the
main movie and having it as a separate Addendum. It’s
very good in its own right.
Rebhahn said:
Splitting it into 3 parts is an excellent idea. I’ll either split it into part 1, part 2, and part 3, or I’ll split the movie “proper” into part 1 and 2 and then have the third as an “exploring deeper” section or something like that.
I love the title “Rise of the Revenants” I’ll definitely use that.
——–
By the way note that Rebhahn stole our phrase SCIENCE OF THE FUTURE for his plagiarized book on ont math. Even the title wasn’t his!
On 18 March, 2018, Rebhahn said about NK:
I’m very wary of working with NK at the moment. He has been down talking Hyperianism a lot and both he and Irene have explicitly said they are distancing themselves from Hyperianism. His attitude has been very frustrating and impeding progress.
All that trouble aside, I’m also concerned about other issues.. He was supposed to get a merit based point system to me the first week in January. We spoke about this and I asked him to make it extremely simple. Not only was it late but it was much too complicated. I asked him to simplify it and he agreed he would do so but never did. I was basing the new Revenant group on this, had my plans altered, and had point graders assigned etc. Getting it up and running was dependent on him and this threw a big wrench in to my plans.
All in all I’m quite wary of working with NK at the moment and I am watching him to see how he acts. If you’d really like me to, I’d consider it of course. I don’t want there to be any bad blood between NK and I. I’m just legitimately concerned at the moment. I’m actually underplaying how much his behavior is concerning me.
I’ve been trying to render a draft of the Hyperian movie to show you over the last couple of days. Due to the files size (the movie is 3.5 hours long) the rendering time is huge and I keep getting errors. It’s scheduled to render in about 14 hours so if it completes without any errors this time I’ll have it to you soon.
But there’s something I’d like to discuss with you.
With the release of the Hyperian movie, I’m going to streamline the website, get the God Series and Truth Series up as recommended reading, and get the new Revenant group going.
I want to take things to the next level. I want our popularity to hit the next tier. We can absolutely make this happen. The only serious problem I am facing is my time constraints in having to produce this video series. This takes up about 80% of my time. If things continue as they are, we will progress, but we will do so at a slow rate. I don’t like that. I want everything bigger, stronger, faster, and more potent.
I want to be able to focus on what I’m good at. I need to be making this cool and popular. I have to be able to create artistic Hyperian videos, (similar in style to music videos), start doing public events in the real world, organize the Order, create immersive experiences, popularize this with the youth, focus on mythos and intrigue, and most importantly I need to be able to network and spread influence. I keep seeing so many missed opportunities. I need the time to strategize and get our message heard.
I know I’ve spoken to you in the past about supplying scripts, and you have done it and it is extremely helpful. But if you are able, I’d like to seriously consider this again. Previously I was feeling a bit uneasy about doing so because obviously people are going to think that these are all my ideas, and because of my immense respect for your work this concerned me a bit, which is why I continued to do some of them. But I am realizing that this is eating up so much time that if Hyperianism is to grow something has to be done.
Again, I know this is a lot to ask, but would you be able to supply 4 topics/scripts per month? Even one page scripts (resulting in a 5 minute video) would be sufficient. This would be a total of 4 pages per month. You could of course do longer ones if you wanted, a 2-3 page script per topic would be ideal ( a total of 8-12 pages per month). Coming up with topics and writing the scripts is what takes up most of my time by far. So in this set up I’d receive the scripts and pretty much film them as is with only minor alterations. If this works out I could perhaps look into hiring someone for the video editing at some point. So even 4 pages per month (one page per topic) would free up enough of my time to be able to focus on expansion. For example, if we implement this I can release the Hyperian movie in april and then move on to focus on expansion. If not, I may have to push the release back to may and then focus on preparing for the next series of videos rather than strategizing for expansion. We have a really good shot here, and I’m seeing so many opportunities that we need to take to get to the next level.
Let me know what you think!
In another message that day, Rebhahn said:
I know Hyperianism is not perfect by any means. If you have any
concerns please feel free to voice them to me so that we can
improve. I would have loved NK’s help. He just seemed
to ditch us rather than helping us improve. I kept asking
him to make videos for us before all this went down so I
could feature him. Perhaps I will reach out to NK and see
if I we can get things on friendly terms. Before potentially
working on a time consuming project with them I’d like
the interpersonal relationship to improve. Irene has been
friendly, it’s mostly NK I’m concerned about. By
the way, on the topic of charisma etc. I have found someone
that could potentially be a very powerful personality in
Hyperianism. Furthermore, she is female and so fulfills that
missing archetypal role. I am currently having her study the
God Series, Hegel, and Fourier. If all goes well I want to
work with her in building her up. So fingers crossed, if
that pans out it will be highly effective. Wonderful to hear
about the scripts! I appreciate it greatly.
————-
In this period, we were working closely with Porgy and NK and both were constantly bitching about each other. We tried to rise above the whole thing and keep the peace, but things just got worse and worse. NK eventually detested Porgy so much that he left the reservation entirely and even started conspiring against US with a bizarre group of Ken Wilberites, and so we denounced him. By that stage, we already intensely disliked Porgy, and in fact agreed with most of NK’s analysis of Porgy. Had NK not turned against us, we would have denounced Porgy in 2019. As it was, we denounced NK and largely stopped working with Porgy. We completely broke with Porgy the following year after he was denounced by Thomas Foster. We weren’t surprised at all by Foster’s revelations. Susan Mitchell was Porgy’s chief confidante and hated Illuminism and she and Porgy had conspired to ban all mention of Illuminism from Hyperianism. Porgy was more than happy to do that since, by that time, we barely communicated anyway.
So, this current situation was a long time in the making!
After we stopped writing video scripts for Rebhahn, that was effectively the end of our involvement with Hyperianism, and it then became purely Rebhahn’s creature, the repulsive and insane queer thing it is now.
The Hyperian movie was arguably the high point of Hyperianism.
Since the original Hyperian movie, as it was delivered, was largely scripted by us, we are going to do our own version (a rewrite). We will get rid of all of Rebhahn’s crap from the script.
We might also arrange for a video deconstructing Rebhahn’s original script, which is close to today’s Hyperianism.
===================
Oh, something is happening in the UK today. We say, “Stuff your coronation up your fucking arse!”
Can you believe that this crap still happens in this century? This is the Old World Order projecting its soft power and spreading a false consciousness amongst the masses about who the “rightful” rulers are. Fuck ‘em.
WE ARE THE JACOBINS.
Live free or die.
Fuck all the bourgeois, reactionary, counter-revolutionary enemies of the people who oppose the working class. Fuck all the New Age, Woke, Queer cults. Fuck the HYPERIAN SCUM.
As we contemplated the new Hyperian Movie, we decided to go back and investigate the old Hyperian Movie from 2018. How did that whole project start?
On 2 Jan 2018, Rebhahn said:
Hello, I hope you had an excellent New Years Eve. Looking forward to a year of success and expansion.
So here’s an update. The problem we currently have is the information is very scattered. I can get attention and reach the masses and make this popular and cool.
The issue is that once I do get their attention, there has to be a powerful place to send them, to direct them.
So I am working on a 90 minute to 2 hour intro video that will give the major points of Hyperianism and bring in our new mythos that will be featured prominently on the website.
I finished the first draft this morning. I am having two individuals review it. The first is an ENTJ that *loves* mythos and understands through symbols and metaphors. She has a hard time understanding math/philosophy. She really wants to help our cause and understand and is trying her best. This is probably the most common type of personality we have to deal with that would be receptive to us.
The second is my brother. He is an INTJ, extremely intelligent, going to Rensselaer for computer science, and very open minded. The exact type of person that we *want* in our cause, unfortunately very rare.
I am going to catalogue their responses, and any confusions or suggestions they have, to dialectically produce something that would ideally appeal to both types.
But I am having trouble introducing the mythos. I have done so to a decent degree and have hit all the major point but it feels a little bare bones. Would you be able to help me with this script? With this portion and in general?
This is going to be a critically important video, and I intend to spend a lot of time editing it and dropping a lot of money for high quality video clips to accompany it. So I really want to get it right.
I’d like to submit the draft to you, along with the responses of the two individuals I mentioned sometime tomorrow night or weds evening by the latest. Ideally I’d begin filming mid next week.
Let me know if you could help with this, I’d greatly appreciate it.
—————————
So, Rebhahn’s half-brother knows exactly what Rebhahn is up to, as does his cop dad and his stepmother. None of these people is innocent. They are up to their neck in this. It’s extremely likely that Rebhahn’s cop dad was highly involved with the false and malicious IC3 complaint that Rebhahn sent to the FBI.
And who is this “ENTJ” woman? Anyone know?
Anyhoo, Rebhahn sent us a first draft of the script and here’s how we replied (diplomatically):
==========
There’s something of a problem regarding how you conceive of the Source which might require a bit of a debate. Have a look at the supplemented version of your document (attached) and see what you think.
To explain the concept exactly is very hard to do within the context of your document.
To give you some idea of the problem, you repeatedly refer to the “fractured Source”. But the Source in itself – as pure noumenon – is never fractured. The Source contains the eternal, immutable, necessary basis waves. These cannot change under any circumstances, so in what way can it be said that the Source has fractured? It’s much easier to assign any fracturing and asymmetry to the Holos. Failing that, a careful distinction has to be drawn between the Source as Noumenon and the Source as Phenomenon.
Imagine a video game. The source language never changes. What changes is how the source language is applied. So, the Source, as the repository of the source language, cannot be fractured. Its application can be fractured, but that is what the Holos is all about. The Source in itself is unfractured, the Holos is fractured, and the temporal relation of minds to the Holos is fractured, but the eternal aspect of minds is not fractured at all, and cannot be. So, “fractured Source” is a problematic term.
Schopenhauer spoke of a single Will existing outside space and time. He said that this became splintered by space and time, thus generating a myriad of individual phenomenal wills. The existence of the many phenomenal wills does not change the existence of the single noumenal will. So, the noumenal will is not “fractured”. What is fractured is the phenomenal expression of the noumenal will. Similarly, the Source itself is not fractured. What is fractured is its phenomenal expression, which is reliant on the Holos.
Think of monads as pianos. The piano keys – the frequencies – never change. What changes is how the piano is played. How do you present Source fracturing in these terms?
We might as well try to make this video/document a pretty definitive introduction so that you can refer any newbies to it straight away … and shut them up because they will see that is a very challenging system that does not suffer fools gladly and does not encourage facile enquiries.
“If you could figure out a way for me to speak about the Watcher/myself that would be great” … we have made a suggestion at the foot of the attached document regarding how this should be handled.
============
So, right from the beginning, Rebhahn never understood ont math. He always did have a catastrophically wrong grasp of the Source (Being) and the universe it generated (Becoming), and this got worse as the years went by, until he now spouts insane gibberish regarding the Source.
The reason why the final movie was fine was that we massively rewrote the script and DOUBLED its size. Rebhahn was responsible for most of the “fluffy” stuff, while we handled all the technical material.
Hyperianism became the joke it is today because Rebhahn of course no longer has us around to correct his incredible errors!
Anyway, here is Rebhahn’s rather revealing reply:
Okay now as far at the fractured Source, yes I completely agree with you [Our note – he never did … he NEVER understood what the Source is, and STILL doesn’t – he literally has no idea.] But here is what is on my mind: People are incredibly stupid. So what I am trying to do is simplify things as much as possible. So when I refer to Source, I am using it as an all encompassing term to refer to: Mathematics, the singularity, frequency, noumena, all reality, all depending on the context and/or the qualifiers.
I know we would be lumping multiple concepts under the word “Source”, but what I’m trying to do is create a simplified “exoteric” version where all people have to do is know two words: “Source” and “Holos” and in the simplified conception, one being ultimate reality, the other being an “illusion”, because unfortunately the vast majority of the public don’t care about the details.
========
So, there you go, all you hyperaware World Shaping Hyperians – Rebhahn himself says that he thinks you are “incredibly stupid” and openly says that he knows that you “don’t care at all about the details”.
Well, for once, Rebhahn is right on both points. But, hey, how are you freaks ever going to learn if your “teacher” thinks you’re as dumb as fuck and deliberately teaches you simplified, “exoteric” nonsense? When has even one of you ever said to Rebhahn, “Why don’t you teach the actual truth (he has no idea what the truth is, but let’s pretend) – and not just simplified junk because you think we’re too stupid for the hard stuff?” Ho, ho, ho. Can you imagine Dyslexic Fairy and Kassidy trying to grasp ont math, the APEX intellectual subject – the most conceptually difficult set of ideas EVER!
Rebhahn said, “The reason I’m trying to do it this way is because OM is so immensely complex that people have no idea what it is. They’re completely lost. I don’t think it is going to help the general public by going into more and more detail, but rather simplifying it. So rather than thinking of Source and Holos as completely and totally rigorously defined separate concepts, they are more general and loose. Similar to how lucifer and satan are more general concepts but can be defined better if necessary.
But the way you explained it in the revisions works perfectly for this script.
What do you think?
==========
Well, we didn’t actually care what Rebhahn thought. Our revised script was fine. It was straightforward, not overly complex, and communicated the basic concepts with reasonable accuracy. Our books of course provide a far more detailed treatment.
For us, the task in the movie was to provide a simplified but not inaccurate version of ont math to the public. As for Rebhahn, not only does he not grasp ont math, he doesn’t even think that accuracy is important. He just wants to tell a “simple story” that stupid people can grasp, and that’s EXACTLY what Hyperianism now is … a total joke of a system, full of fallacies. But Rebhahn knows that none of his dumb cult slaves cares, and he’s fucking 100% right about that – we say this all the time! They have no interest in this material at all. They just want Rebhahn to tell them a Woke story and assure them that they are “hyperaware World Shapers”.
Rebhahn said (given that we had doubled the size of the script and made it much more technical), “The revisions are great, again I’m always appreciative of your help and support. My only concern is that this is an overload of information. I have sent the revised script to three people of widely varying personality types and am going to see what they think.
“Here are the two options I’m considering, either I will:
“A. Keep the script more or less like how you provided it, with a few little adjustments here or there.
“B. Keep the script more or less like the previous original version and end it (doing this would allow me to have more video imagery placed closer together as well, which would keep people’s attention, rather than long spaces of me talking to the camera with no imagery). Then place all of the extra information you provided afterwards, combined with the faq section, to create a separate part of the video that goes into more technical detail.
“C. A mix of A and B, (reduce the main video some but not completely, placing the omitted portions at the end).
Personally I’m back and forth between these options. I’m going to wait until I have everyone’s feedback before deciding on one, but I’m leaning towards C. The more mythos oriented person I mentioned just got back to me and said she personally prefers option A but feels the general public might prefer option B or C. Susan is going over it now, and the more logos oriented person will go over it tomorrow.
“Let me know what you think about all of this. I’ll be working on this over the next couple of days with the goal of filming sometime this week.”
—–
We said, “Re: ‘My only concern is that this is an overload of information.’ – Yes, there is that danger, but it’s also good to be able to refer people to a single detailed account and let them sink or swim. Also, this material will intellectually intimidate the trolls who are always trying to put you down on the basis of your image. Isn’t the main idea behind this to put out a fairly comprehensive explanation of OM and Hyperianism so that you can say to anyone, ‘If you need more detail, go and watch this video.’ There’s a tension between trying to make it simple and also trying to make it comprehensive. Is it there to sell Hyperianism, or to defend Hyperianism when people try to troll Hyperianism?”
A few days later, Rebhahn said, “Sorry about the delay. I had to make a lot of adjustments according to suggestions from the test individuals.
“Both individuals really liked the script and thought it was a great intro to Hyperianism.
“The more Mythos oriented individual recommended I add a description of the double slit experiment, as she said she wouldn’t have believed Hyperianism until she was aware of that experiment.
“The more Logos oriented individual (ironically) was really interested in the Watcher that has incarnated (myself). He said that should be elaborated, and that it will really intrigue people.
“Of course, this is extremely difficult for me to do, as it’s hard for me to talk about myself.
“Some of the Mythos sections could perhaps be filled out a little, and given some more meat. If you could figure out a way for me to speak about the Watcher/myself that would be great, but I realize that’s really hard, so no problems there if not.
“If you don’t mind checking the FAQ as well, and making sure I didn’t make any mistakes with regard to Godel and QM.
“Towards the end of the video, I am going to add in the already filmed New World Order video during the editing phase. I have indicated where I will add it. I’ve attached the NWO script as well just as a reminder of its content. [The NWO script was an earlier script by us.]
Oh! I forgot to mention. I think the female Watcher is fucking brilliant. Adding a potential love story will be incredibly alluring, and it fits all my social media posts about searching beyond time and space for a lost love. I have to get to working on the script but definitely excellent, and I’d love to discuss this more and figure out an even more effective way to get this out.
We said, “The combination of male and female Watchers provides the male and female poles by which we can reach a synthesis fair to both men and women that defeats the masculine patriarchy (negative pole) and the feminine matriarchy (positive pole), and allows a higher synthesis of male and female attributes in society. When we introduce Mythos material in general, it might be a good idea to present it with a different signature, i.e. ethereal and dreamy rather than direct to camera, and often using voices other than yours (so that you can be talked about in the third person).
Rebhahn said, “I’ve kept the content of the script essentially the same except that I’ve moved a large portion of information to the ending section of the video.
“When speaking about the ‘God level’ of the game I added a sentence about love: ‘The purpose of Hyperianism is to elevate you to the next level so that you can begin to consciously play the game. Your task, if you did but know it, is to reach the God level of the game. Your journey to this level of the game culminates in the realization of your limitless power and becoming god as well as guaranteeing that you’ll find your perfect love.’ Unfortunately we don’t have much of an appeal to women in this video, but hopefully that sentence helps a bit.”
Yes, you need to keep your harem of dummies sweet, don’t you, Rebhahn?!
By the way, folks, do you remember when Rebhahn said that the Hyperboreans were Nazis and anyone who talks about Hyperborea is a Nazi?!
Well, here’s what Porgy said in the Hyperian movie:
“They created a brilliant civilization where the people lived and learned together. They explored love, sex, art and music, and advanced quickly in their knowledge of mathematics and the Source. But their society, our magnificent beacon of Hyperborea, was destroyed by the negatives. Thus, to survive, the Synths were forced to fracture and exist in hidden groups and secret societies. … Through his writing, Nietzsche’s unconscious knowledge of what he was flowed onto the pages: “Let us face ourselves. We are Hyperboreans; we know very well how far off we live. ‘Neither by land nor by sea will you find the way to the Hyperboreans’ — Pindar already knew this about us. Beyond the north, ice, and death — our life, our happiness. We have discovered happiness, we know the way, we have found the exit out of the labyrinth of thousands of years. Who else has found it?”
….
[Next is a section from the “Watcher” section within the movie (scripted by us – very regrettably, in hindsight!):]
Everyone wanted to be part of the realm of crystal miracles. This was Hyperborea, which some called Atlantis. But when the twelfth hour struck for the twelfth time, the law of sacred numbers demanded an apocalypse to celebrate the arrival of the magical gross. Hyperborea fell and hell was built in its place.
Morgue is here to crash the infernal system that now prevails. He is here to reboot the world, to restore the Hyperborean paradise. He is here to lead the Revenants, to inspire them, to help them remember their true selves, to direct their awesome energy and spirit.
Join the sacred cause of Hyperianism … the mission to transform humanity into a free, fully-optimized species, a divine species, a community of the sacred, a society of gods and goddesses, a HyperHumanity of Sourcers who have mastered the Source Code of Reality through the use of the highest reason and logic. Is that not the true definition of “God”?
Join us. Free yourself and free the world. Make yourself what you are destined to become. Make it happen now. Join the Free Spirits, the Wanderers, Revenants and Sourcers, those who will build the New World Order where the people rule rather than the greedy selfish rich elites and the crazy peddlers of ancient religious superstitions.
If you want the world to change, you need to make your contribution. You can’t expect others to do it for you.
——–
So, either Rebhahn was a NAZI when he made the Hyperian (Hyperborean) movie, or he’s LYING now by accusing us of being Nazis because we refer to Hyperborea. Which is it, all you dumbfuck Hyperians?
By the way, Hyperianism is practically named after Hyperborea! Here’s Rebhahn’s full message to us when he first mentioned the term “Hyperianism”:
Your video scripts are excellent! This is most helpful. This is packed with information. I wont know for sure until I begin working on this but it seems to me there is enough info here for 5 videos if not more. My goal is to make sure this information is understood and viewed. What I would like to do, is use this information as jumping off points, and to work with it and put it into a form that the public can easily understand and will also be compatible with their extraordinarily short attention spans. I am already seeing a few paragraphs that are so dense with information that I could expound upon them into their own videos. So I may select a few paragraphs, add information, details, metaphors, alter wording etc. into its own video. I would also like to let a few of my trusted members know what is going on (that those involved with the AC are helping us with information) and have them view this information to help me put it together in the most optimized way. Is all of this acceptable? If so, would you like to be made aware of the alterations or see a draft?
I may also have to be generic and not reference Muslims directly. This is because doing so could potentially get me fired. Lucifer is also a topic that will put me at risk, as well as Illuminati and NWO. As soon as I am able to be totally financially independent this will no longer be a restriction.
I love the idea of uniforms and a distinct look. I will give this thought. I could possibly speak with https://majestyblack.com Though they are Thelemites and I am very hesitant because of this. I am heavily leaning towards the name Hyperrationalism, and I have purchased the domain hyperrationalism.com. I think it fits well and sounds authoritative. A shortened version that I like a lot could be Hyperianism. “I am a Hyperian” It has the feel of transcendence. Hyperborea (or possibly, Hyperia?) also fits well into a promised land scheme.
Another domain name I am considering is ExitRealityNow.com I think it is catchy and tempting to click on, though in the long run Hyperrationalism.com will be taken much more seriously.
This new site will be a complete redesign with a new aesthetic to make everything more modern . It will *heavily* utilize my cult of personality, and also heavily emphasize Dionysian elements. It will also be emphasizing The Three Paths: The Path of Shadow, The Path of Intuition, and The Path of Reason. I’ve begun writing a new book that will be all about this. This is in an effort to condense key points into a very simplistic and easy to remember scheme. Tentatively the book will be titled: “The Path of Shadow: The Dark Way to Enlightenment through Sex, Love, and Reason” The goal is to get people from Shadow to Reason.
I am attaching a few photos that will possibly be used on the website to give you a feel for the aesthetic.
I know I’m making this a lot about “me”, but it has been by *far* the most effective tactic for appealing to many people.
The main message of the site would be something like: “Hyperrationalism shows that reality is 100% logical, rational, and mathematical. This guarantees that you are not a body but you are a Mind that is eternal and indestructible. Each one of us is an eternal Mind of infinite potential and together we form One system which is the Universe experiencing itself.”
——–
So, all you Hyperians, you are HYPERBOREAN NAZIS!
Here’s a radical idea – why don’t you Hyperian cult slaves ask, on one of your cult god’s deadstreams, if he and all of you are NAZIS! Ask him why he was once so heavily into HYPERBOREA (Nazi paradise, apparently!).
Porgy is a compulsive liar. His last deadstream was entitled: “Christians WON… I’m Coming Back to Christianity…”
WTF!
Rebhahn is simply a Queer Christian, a Queer Gnostic Christian, to be more exact.
On April 3 2018, Porgy said, “Fantastic! Thank you, this is very much appreciated and your video scripts are the perfect length. I think this is going to end up working very well. April is devoted to releasing the Hyperian movie and then I will begin weekly video releases again. So I will be filming these scripts in April but they will be released weekly beginning in May. I’ll need to film another set for June sometime in early may. Is that acceptable?
By the way, I think the mythos elements we have added are going to work quite well. I haven’t released the Hyperian movie yet, but the Revenant/Watcher portion is available to those on patreon and people have already begun to show excitement. The more elements like this the more people will get excited. I want to play this out in the real world, a living mythos, that people can watch unfold and be a part of. The ultimate immersive experience.
Our reply was:
We’ll send you four scripts by the end of each month. The next four will be with you by the end of April.
Re: “I want to play this out in the real world, a living mythos, that people can watch unfold and be a part of. The ultimate immersive experience.” – Yes, that’s exactly what we need to aim for. But that means you will have to look for someone to play the part of the female Watcher. And we will also have to invent evil Watchers that are trying to thwart us, and so on. We need to tell a gripping story played out in real life that gets everyone emotionally on board, and gets them involved in real life events. It’s a big challenge!
Rebhahn said:
Fantastic!
I am almost positive I found the perfect person for the female Watcher. I’ve been working with her for a few months. This will take a little time, but if it all works out, it will be extremely powerful. I live near Devil’s Gate Dam (Crowley called it a portal to hell) right across from Jack Parson’s lab where Crowley did some rituals. I could create some kind of initiation ceremony with her there. I’m looking forward to actualizing all of this. This is the key to getting people fired up and engaged.
Quick question. As you know, I used to think that positive sinusoids had to be balanced with negative sinusoids to net to zero. I now understand that a sinusoid itself already nets to zero over one full cycle. At that point, my reasoning for a monad being indivisible, was that any removal or addition of energy would result in net energy and hence violate the requirement of net zero. I now know this reasoning for indivisibility is incorrect. Is the correct reasoning that, since a monad is a full set of mathematics, it can’t possibly be divided because that would lead to inconsistencies and incompleteness? Or is it simply because a monad is a singularity and obviously you cannot divide a singularity?
We said:
Re Devil’s Gate Dam – great. You could do some outdoor filming in that area since it’s so scenic and atmospheric.
Re the indivisible monad – a monad can’t possibly be divided because that would contradict its definition. The definition of a monad, as per its formula, is that it intrinsically includes all possible valid sinusoids (frequencies). No valid frequencies can be excluded. It is thus an autonomous expression of all of ontological mathematics. It is surrounded by a myriad of monads of exactly the same nature, and thus it mathematically interacts with these.
It’s vital to distinguish between monad as “being” and monad as “becoming”. As being, a monad is forever the same: a set of eternal, immutable, perfect, basis sinusoids, equivalent to Platonic Forms. However, such a system automatically starts combining these basis waves and in doing so creates the world of becoming. So, the system has two components: 1) necessary basis waves (being), and 2) contingent combinations of basis waves (becoming). That’s the whole of existence: being and becoming, with the latter being derived from the former, and the latter being dialectical and the former not. As soon as you have basis waves, you immediately have the capacity to create contingent combinations of these basis waves and that’s what produces the spacetime world of matter that we experience. The system is the simplest possible. One might loosely consider it in terms of Lego bricks. Imagine eternal Lego bricks that automatically start combining with each other, and then pulling each other apart and entering into new combinations. Then give them a dialectical nature so that they are attempting to produce the perfect Lego pattern (which is that of perfect order = zero entropy).
In Atomism, the atoms are the Lego bricks but the atoms are themselves made of more basic bricks, and we never reach any foundational layer. With monads and their sinusoids, we do.
Here are a few random suggestions for naming the first part of the Hyperian movie…
Hyperianism: The Unconquerable Will
Hyperianism: The First Disobedience
Hyperianism: Interdicted Knowledge
Hyperianism: The New World Order
Hyperianism: Rebooting the World
Hyperianism: The Science of the Future
The Hyperians: The Assassins of God
Hyperianism: Revealing the Source Code
Hyperianism: Involution and Evolution
The Hyperians: Heaven’s Fugitives
A 3.5 hour video may be too much for some people. Two videos may work better. Anyone who watches the 2.5 hour video will certainly then watch the 1 hour video.
Conceivably some might watch the 1 hour video first if you give it an intriguing title.
Maybe you could call the second video something like “Think Again: How Hyperian Rationalism Refutes Empirical Scientism”
In fact, you could even arguably split the 2.5 hour video into a 1.5 and 1 hr videos. The 1 hour video would accommodate everything about Wanderers, Revenants, New World Order. Maybe you could call it The Rise of the Revenants.
1) Hyperianism: The Revaluation of all Values
2) The Rise of the Revenants: Making Earth a Freedom Planet Rather Than Prison Planet
3) Think Again: How Hyperian Rationalism Refutes Empirical Scientism
At 3.11.07 Did you say that unperceived things CAN exist?
Berkeley’s position is the exact opposite: there are no
unperceived things.
You might think of separating the Q&A section from the
main movie and having it as a separate Addendum. It’s
very good in its own right.
Rebhahn said:
Splitting it into 3 parts is an excellent idea. I’ll either split it into part 1, part 2, and part 3, or I’ll split the movie “proper” into part 1 and 2 and then have the third as an “exploring deeper” section or something like that.
I love the title “Rise of the Revenants” I’ll definitely use that.
——–
By the way note that Rebhahn stole our phrase SCIENCE OF THE FUTURE for his plagiarized book on ont math. Even the title wasn’t his!
On 18 March, 2018, Rebhahn said about NK:
I’m very wary of working with NK at the moment. He has been down talking Hyperianism a lot and both he and Irene have explicitly said they are distancing themselves from Hyperianism. His attitude has been very frustrating and impeding progress.
All that trouble aside, I’m also concerned about other issues.. He was supposed to get a merit based point system to me the first week in January. We spoke about this and I asked him to make it extremely simple. Not only was it late but it was much too complicated. I asked him to simplify it and he agreed he would do so but never did. I was basing the new Revenant group on this, had my plans altered, and had point graders assigned etc. Getting it up and running was dependent on him and this threw a big wrench in to my plans.
All in all I’m quite wary of working with NK at the moment and I am watching him to see how he acts. If you’d really like me to, I’d consider it of course. I don’t want there to be any bad blood between NK and I. I’m just legitimately concerned at the moment. I’m actually underplaying how much his behavior is concerning me.
I’ve been trying to render a draft of the Hyperian movie to show you over the last couple of days. Due to the files size (the movie is 3.5 hours long) the rendering time is huge and I keep getting errors. It’s scheduled to render in about 14 hours so if it completes without any errors this time I’ll have it to you soon.
But there’s something I’d like to discuss with you.
With the release of the Hyperian movie, I’m going to streamline the website, get the God Series and Truth Series up as recommended reading, and get the new Revenant group going.
I want to take things to the next level. I want our popularity to hit the next tier. We can absolutely make this happen. The only serious problem I am facing is my time constraints in having to produce this video series. This takes up about 80% of my time. If things continue as they are, we will progress, but we will do so at a slow rate. I don’t like that. I want everything bigger, stronger, faster, and more potent.
I want to be able to focus on what I’m good at. I need to be making this cool and popular. I have to be able to create artistic Hyperian videos, (similar in style to music videos), start doing public events in the real world, organize the Order, create immersive experiences, popularize this with the youth, focus on mythos and intrigue, and most importantly I need to be able to network and spread influence. I keep seeing so many missed opportunities. I need the time to strategize and get our message heard.
I know I’ve spoken to you in the past about supplying scripts, and you have done it and it is extremely helpful. But if you are able, I’d like to seriously consider this again. Previously I was feeling a bit uneasy about doing so because obviously people are going to think that these are all my ideas, and because of my immense respect for your work this concerned me a bit, which is why I continued to do some of them. But I am realizing that this is eating up so much time that if Hyperianism is to grow something has to be done.
Again, I know this is a lot to ask, but would you be able to supply 4 topics/scripts per month? Even one page scripts (resulting in a 5 minute video) would be sufficient. This would be a total of 4 pages per month. You could of course do longer ones if you wanted, a 2-3 page script per topic would be ideal ( a total of 8-12 pages per month). Coming up with topics and writing the scripts is what takes up most of my time by far. So in this set up I’d receive the scripts and pretty much film them as is with only minor alterations. If this works out I could perhaps look into hiring someone for the video editing at some point. So even 4 pages per month (one page per topic) would free up enough of my time to be able to focus on expansion. For example, if we implement this I can release the Hyperian movie in april and then move on to focus on expansion. If not, I may have to push the release back to may and then focus on preparing for the next series of videos rather than strategizing for expansion. We have a really good shot here, and I’m seeing so many opportunities that we need to take to get to the next level.
Let me know what you think!
In another message that day, Rebhahn said:
I know Hyperianism is not perfect by any means. If you have any
concerns please feel free to voice them to me so that we can
improve. I would have loved NK’s help. He just seemed
to ditch us rather than helping us improve. I kept asking
him to make videos for us before all this went down so I
could feature him. Perhaps I will reach out to NK and see
if I we can get things on friendly terms. Before potentially
working on a time consuming project with them I’d like
the interpersonal relationship to improve. Irene has been
friendly, it’s mostly NK I’m concerned about. By
the way, on the topic of charisma etc. I have found someone
that could potentially be a very powerful personality in
Hyperianism. Furthermore, she is female and so fulfills that
missing archetypal role. I am currently having her study the
God Series, Hegel, and Fourier. If all goes well I want to
work with her in building her up. So fingers crossed, if
that pans out it will be highly effective. Wonderful to hear
about the scripts! I appreciate it greatly.
————-
In this period, we were working closely with Porgy and NK and both were constantly bitching about each other. We tried to rise above the whole thing and keep the peace, but things just got worse and worse. NK eventually detested Porgy so much that he left the reservation entirely and even started conspiring against US with a bizarre group of Ken Wilberites, and so we denounced him. By that stage, we already intensely disliked Porgy, and in fact agreed with most of NK’s analysis of Porgy. Had NK not turned against us, we would have denounced Porgy in 2019. As it was, we denounced NK and largely stopped working with Porgy. We completely broke with Porgy the following year after he was denounced by Thomas Foster. We weren’t surprised at all by Foster’s revelations. Susan Mitchell was Porgy’s chief confidante and hated Illuminism and she and Porgy had conspired to ban all mention of Illuminism from Hyperianism. Porgy was more than happy to do that since, by that time, we barely communicated anyway.
So, this current situation was a long time in the making!
After we stopped writing video scripts for Rebhahn, that was effectively the end of our involvement with Hyperianism, and it then became purely Rebhahn’s creature, the repulsive and insane queer thing it is now.
The Hyperian movie was arguably the high point of Hyperianism.
Since the original Hyperian movie, as it was delivered, was largely scripted by us, we are going to do our own version (a rewrite). We will get rid of all of Rebhahn’s crap from the script.
We might also arrange for a video deconstructing Rebhahn’s original script, which is close to today’s Hyperianism.
===================
Oh, something is happening in the UK today. We say, “Stuff your coronation up your fucking arse!”
Can you believe that this crap still happens in this century? This is the Old World Order projecting its soft power and spreading a false consciousness amongst the masses about who the “rightful” rulers are. Fuck ‘em.
WE ARE THE JACOBINS.
Live free or die.
Fuck all the bourgeois, reactionary, counter-revolutionary enemies of the people who oppose the working class. Fuck all the New Age, Woke, Queer cults. Fuck the HYPERIAN SCUM.
Tags: Corey Rebhahn, Morgue Official, Morgen Night, Hyperianism, Morgue from Freakshow, Hyperian, Hyperianism Quotes, AMC Freakshow, Inner Star Actualization, Cult of Hyperianism, Hyperian Founder, Morgue Official Real Name, What is Hyperianism, Hyperianism Beliefs, Morgue Official Wikipedia