BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON THE DANGEROUS CULT OF HYPERIANISM
• FROM THE CITIZEN JOURNALISTS OF THE AC •
Let’s get back to the coalface and the Hyperian “One Mind” fallacy. Notice that we answer the shit the trolls throw at us. And we never ask for superchats. Rebhahn NEVER answers his critics, and none of his slaves EVER asks him a challenging question, although they send him endless superchats about vacuous garbage.
So, picking up from yesterday’s article, the Hyperian troll Bryan Walters said,
“It’s a cyclical cosmological cycle.”
The domain of Becoming is cyclical. The domain of Being is absolutely NOT. It is eternally and necessarily static (i.e., immutable). Come on, people, have you understood NOTHING of our system? Plato sought to bring together the unchangingness (BEING) of Parmenides and the ever-changingness (BECOMING) of Heraclitus. Plato came up with unchanging Form (Being) and ever-changing matter (Becoming). Ontological mathematics has unchanging frequencies (Being) and ever-changing spacetime (Becoming), the two domains reflecting a dual-aspect monism via ontological Fourier mathematics, linking the frequency domain of mind and the spacetime domain of matter, thus solving the otherwise impossible problem of Cartesian substance dualism.
The ancient Atomists had a system of eternal, unchanging atoms (Being), which, via hooking together or unhooking from each other, generated the temporal and contingent domain of change (Becoming). A vital consideration here is that the eternal units here, the atoms, actually participate in the temporal and contingent order by moving around in it.
Let’s be very clear about this. Unchanging atoms create change by MOVING and coupling or decoupling with other unchanging atoms.
What about ontological mathematics? Ont math is all about a Singularity. Everything happens within this Singularity. Nothing physically moves. There is no physical space, so Atomism cannot apply. Ont math is all about the superposition of mathematical waves. The eternal and necessary basis waves never move anywhere (there is nowhere to move to!), so how do they generate change? They do so via TRANSFORMATION, via mathematical transforms (the inverse and forward transforms of ontological Fourier mathematics). Transformation, in these terms, is EXCLUSIVELY MATHEMATICAL, meaning that reality is exclusively mathematical. Science, even though it uses math all the time, is of course profoundly anti-mathematical since it always looks for PHYSICAL explanations, and never for MATHEMATICAL explanations. So, it would NEVER accept a non-physical domain of eternal frequencies as being the source of spacetime via ontological Fourier mathematics. Instead, it prefers randomness … spacetime randomly jumping into existence out of non-existence. Science has NO eternal and necessary features (these are non-scientific!). It is entirely about the temporal and contingent, so has to get the temporal and contingent started via randomness, since it has no eternal and necessary order to appeal to. Ont math gets rid of randomness entirely. Ont math is based on the PSR, so absolutely everything has an explanation. Randomness IS IMPOSSIBLE! For science, eternal and necessary existence is impossible! (Such existence is not material and empirical, hence is incompatible with the scientific method, a method that assumes the temporal and contingent).
Many people assume they “get” ont math when they self-evidently do not. They are trying to generate physical models – picture-thinking stuff – of what is going on. They refuse to, or cannot, migrate to mathematical conceptualism (non-picture thinking). Most people CANNOT grasp the idea that an eternal and necessary system of mathematical frequencies (sinusoids), by its very conceptual, mathematical nature, generates a secondary mathematical domain of spacetime – the temporal and contingent material domain of becoming, of SCIENCE. Even Nobel laureates in physics cannot grasp such concepts. It’s not that these concepts are difficult … it’s that they are profoundly alien to how humanity pictures reality. Atomism gives people a picture they can grasp. Ont math, with its wave superposition and wave transforms, does not. Ont math conceptually solves all of the great issues of philosophy, but people just can’t get their heads around it because it’s conceptual rather than picture-based, meaning that you have to be really fucking intelligent – a thinking type using reason and logic – before you can get anywhere near understanding what is going on. Absolute knowledge is for thinking types. Sensing and feeling types will never get there. Intellectual, but not emotional, intuitives can get there too. There are people out there who know that ont math is right – because their intellectual intuition immediately showed them the truth of it, even if the details of ont math are still difficult for them.
Bryan Walters said,
” After entropy is the total heat death of the universe.”
Eh? Wikipedia says,
“The heat death of the universe (also known as the Big Chill or Big Freeze) is a hypothesis on the ultimate fate of the universe, which suggests the universe will evolve to a state of no thermodynamic free energy and will therefore be unable to sustain processes that increase entropy. Heat death does not imply any particular absolute temperature; it only requires that temperature differences or other processes may no longer be exploited to perform work. In the language of physics, this is when the universe reaches thermodynamic equilibrium. The Heat Death theory has become the leading theory in the modern age with the fewest unpredictable factors.”
This is pure scientific materialism. It has nothing to do with ontological mathematics, which is driven by the ultimate and inevitable victory of NEGENTROPY. This is all mathematically baked in. To be more precise, all spacetime functions must unravel (through space expanding, and so on) and bring the domain of Becoming back to the pure non-spacetime, zero-entropy domain of Being that spawned it at the Big Bang (which was actually just an ontological Fourier mathematical event of frequency generating spacetime!).
Walters said,
“You would then have a singularity and another big bang.”
To repeat, this heat death stuff is nothing to do with our system. There is an eternal and necessary Singularity – which permanently exists at zero entropy and thus has an absolute temperature of zero – and nothing EVER leaves the Singularity. All mathematical operations are carried out WITHIN the Singularity. The Big Bang universe is an internal mathematical projection – a true, ontological HOLOGRAM – within a frequency domain of Being that cannot but create a spacetime domain of Becoming because of the intrinsic properties of mathematical sinusoidal waves. It’s all in the math!
How many times have we said that the signature analogy is dreaming. Your individual mind creates an individual dream and then ends that dream when you wake up. The dream at no time leaves your mind, or sticks out of your mind into the physical world. It is totally self-contained. The dream is a mathematical projection within the mind of the dreamer. It is physical. The dreamworld is purely mental.
There is no “physical” universe at all. There is a mathematical, mental universe that APPEARS to be physical and is misinterpreted as being physical – because people don’t understand ontological mathematics and how it creates the spacetime universe of “matter”.
NOT
Bryan Walters said,
“it’s called the cyclical cosmological model.”
But in a totally different way from how you imagine. It has nothing to do with scientific materialist heat death, with relentlessly increasing entropy. In fact, the universe is driven to its conclusion by NEGENTROPY, and its base state is zero entropy, the total elimination of entropy!
Go and study Kant’s antinomies. You need a basic philosophical education … URGENTLY.
Wikipedia says:
“The first antinomy (of space and time):
Thesis: The world has a beginning in time, and is also limited as regards space.
Anti-thesis: The world has no beginning, and no limits in space; it is infinite as regards both time and space.”
Kant believed that pure reason (metaphysics) could not solve various problems, hence his “critique” of pure reason. As you can see, Kant put up an antithesis against a thesis, and said that no resolution was possible. Hegel said that an answer IS possible, via a dialectic involving an additional SYNTHESIS phase.
In fact, all of these things are just mathematical issues. So, the domain of Being – the frequency domain – has no beginning (it’s eternal and necessary) and is NEVER in space and time. It’s a pure, immaterial Singularity and can contain infinity (ONLY a singularity can ontologically accommodate infinity).
The domain of Becoming – generated as a mathematical projection within the domain of Being – has both a beginning in time, and an end in time, and is a limited material universe in space and time guaranteed to come to an end.
It’s Kant’s anti-mathematical reasoning that was flawed and must be critiqued … not pure reason … WHICH NEVER ERRS!
Wikipedia says,
“The second antinomy (of atomism)
Thesis: Every composite substance in the world is made up of simple parts, and nothing anywhere exists save the simple or what is composed of the simple.
Anti-thesis: No composite thing in the world is made up of simple parts, and there nowhere exists in the world anything simple.”
So, reality comprises simple units/unities (monads), constituted of a complete set of simple basis waves (basis thoughts). Reality, via Occam’s razor, must be about absolute simplicity, the simplest reality possible of the simplest units possible, sufficient to create the greatest number of phenomena possible (absolute simplicity must not be maximally sterile; on the contrary, it must be maximally universal and fertile … as Leibniz said: “[reality must be] simplest in hypothesis and the richest in phenomena.”; maximum simplicity, maximum universality and maximum productivity all go together – which is yet another reason why there can be no such thing as ONE MIND!) The universe must be maximally universal (!) in order to produce the maximum number of particulars; there is no reason why reality would restrict itself so as not to achieve this outcome … it would never, for example, be ONE MIND!!!
All complex things are derived from simple things. It’s impossible to get complexity not grounded in simplicity. Complexity has no sufficient reason. It cannot be arrived at via any rational means. Complexity can only logically come from simplicity!
Wikipedia says,
“The third antinomy (of spontaneity and causal determinism)
Thesis: Causality in accordance with laws of nature is not the only causality from which the appearances of the world can one and all be derived. To explain these appearances it is necessary to assume that there is also another causality, that of Spontaneity.
Anti-thesis: There is no Spontaneity; everything in the world takes place solely in accordance with laws of nature.”
Everything does indeed take place solely in accordance with the laws of nature, but these ontological mathematical laws are both syntactic and semantic, rational and empirical, objective and subjective, and support subjectivity and free will – exactly because our basis thoughts are ours forever and can never be melted into any other minds to become THEIR basis thoughts! That would instantly destroy free will and subjectivity! That’s why there is no such thing as ONE MIND, the ultimate solipsistic and narcissistic system, hence why solipsism (inherent ontological unity) is so beloved by the malignant narcissist Corey Rebhahn, Queen Bee leader of the Hyperian cult of mindless slaves (drones)!
There are absolutely no random processes, processes without sufficient reasons (“spontaneous” processes). Material causation is very different from immaterial (mental) causation. Our physical bodies are not ours – they are made from material atoms that didn’t originate with us. Our basis thoughts, on the other hand, are permanently ours, and ours alone. THERE IS NO HYPERIAN “ONE MIND” OF TOTAL SOLIPSISM AND NARCISSISM!
Wikipedia says,
“The fourth antinomy (of necessary being or not)
Thesis: There belongs to the world, either as its part or as its cause, a being that is absolutely necessary.
Anti-thesis: An absolutely necessary being nowhere exists in the world, nor does it exist outside the world as its cause.”
Individual monads are beings that are absolutely necessary. ONE MIND is absolutely unnecessary and doesn’t exist. There are always MANY monadic minds. Hyperianism is 100% false. We live in a Hive Mind (Many Minds) reality, not a One Mind or Zero Minds reality! Hyperianism is totally false. So is mindless scientific materialism.
Monads can NEVER ontologically vanish (into other things, such as into ONE MIND, as Hyperianism fallaciously claims).
There is definitely NOT ONE absolutely necessary being. Whatever reason would justify the existence of one immediately justifies the existence of others. There is NOTHING to stop a myriad of monads, an ontological HIVE MIND. Monads are net zeros. They require nothing, and nothing can stop them, and so their existence is therefore compulsory. The existence of ONE MIND alone is absolutely FORBIDDEN! And so Hyperianism is impossible, and so is whatever Bryan Walters believes in (which is basically just Hyperianism).
Can you imagine Hyperians like Shope, Mitchell, Torgensen, Dyslexic Fairy, Kassidy, Wonderpoop, PUKES, and all the rest of the halfwits and dunces trying to follow these arguments? The whole idea is comedy gold. These people are MORONS, and they led by the moron in chief – Moron Morgue, the man with no education and no qualifications! That perfectly sums up Hyperianism. It’s the Dunning-Kruger effect on stilts, or on high heels in the case of Moron Morgue, the crossdresser!
By the way, Grindr Phil is so thick that he needs to make a video to explain to himself what “objectivity” means. Look it up in an online dictionary, Necropants Guy. You’ll save yourself shitloads of time. Apparently, people who don’t know what “objectivity” means are going to build NEW TERRA. Ho, ho, ho.
Bryan Walters said,
“i’m not a fan of Cory”
HAHAHAHAHA. You completely support his fallacies and have many fallacies of your own to add to the mix and are totally trolling us in order to advance the cause of Hyperianism.
Bryan Walters said,
“but your debate here is illegitimate in terms of the 10 coin comparison”
You have no understanding at all of our system … and that’s precisely why you call the 10 coins comparison illegitimate. It’s your comprehension that is flawed, not the argument. And that happens to us ALL THE TIME. Our ideas are incredibly intellectual. Most of the people encountering our ideas are incredibly unintellectual and anti-intellectual and campaign against intellectualism. Just look at Hyperianism, a hyper-emotional cult led by a cult leader with NO QUALIFICATIONS. You couldn’t get any group more opposed to intellectual merit and more contemptuous of intellectuals than Hyperianism. That’s why these cretins troll us relentlessly. Intellect is OFFENSIVE to them!
Listen folks, don’t be Dunning-Kruger types, like the ghastly Hyperians. Respect education and qualifications. Rebhahn has no education, no qualifications, and no respect for intelligent people. Bryan Walters is exactly the same.
Illuminism is about MERITOCRACY. That means that you MUST respect merit. Rebhahn and Walters have zero respect for merit, and believe that their narcissistic assholery always trumps everything!
Walters weighed in with comments designed to support Corey Rebhahn yet claims to be opposed to Hyperianism. He is a self-evident Hyperian TROLL.
Bryan Walters said,
“@WRATH this weird video is not from the same authors as the God series. It’s weird AI bullshit, if it is from the authors of these books I’m gonna throw them in the trash.”
Well, throw them in the trash! You didn’t understand those books AT ALL. And we realize that is true of so many people. Rebhahn didn’t have a fucking clue either.
Bryan Walters said,
” @WRATH if the authors of those books created that video I’m out entirely. It was horribly done, no wonder morgue stole their thunder…….. That was garbage.”
We absolutely hope you’re “out entirely”. You would be purged otherwise! You are a blatant Hyperian, and you completely agree with the simpleton Rebhahn! You are exactly what we are up against! You are part of the Troll Army, those Dunning-Kruger types who constantly attack the truth.
You are an entitled, grandiose narcissist, just like Rebhahn, who believes that you have some right to impose your egregious errors on the world … just like Rebhahn. This is the modern world. This is why the West is collapsing.
WRATH said,
“@Bryan Walters they wrote the article that’s in the description. Leave. Nobody wants a dunning Kruger person around.”
And that’s exactly right.
Pythagoras said,
“Be silent, or say something better than silence.”
The world is now full of people who can’t shut up and would never dream of being silent even though being silent would ALWAYS be their best move so as not to expose their total ignorance of things they know nothing about.
George Eliot said,
“Tis best to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”
Jonathan Swift said,
“When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.”
Plato said,
“No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.”
Schopenhauer said,
“Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.”
It’s impossible for most people to see what we’re getting at. It’s beyond their abilities. Look at the Hyperians. These dunces can only cope with Rebhahn’s Woke Cretinism. This is a man so stupid that he believe he is the smartest man who ever lived. But, of course, that’s exactly what the pathology of malignant narcissism does to people. They lose all touch with reality. They live in a permanent fantasy. And that’s what Hyperianism is. Look at Dyslexic Fairy – an absolute infantilized fantasist who would NEVER find herself on the side of the intelligent. She is a Woke maniac, and such people are ALWAYS opposed to intelligence. As Nietzsche said, these people FORBID the truth. They cancel it!
We are up against a tsunami of dunces who are ORGASMIC about the thought of ONE MIND (love and light, unconditional love, cosmic consciousness, and all that baloney … oh, did you notice that Corey Cretin is now fully onboard with cosmic consciousness and says that the Big Bang was produced by consciousness … we shit you not:
“Consciousness Didn’t Evolve, It Creates Evolution | Secret Video Members only MorgueOfficial Feb 3, 2023 … In this mind-bending video, we discover that consciousness was not a mere product of accidental evolution, but rather an intrinsic aspect of the universe from the very outset, preceding the process of evolution and actually creates evolution. The Big Bang must be understood within a framework that recognizes the fundamental nature of consciousness.”
… Hyperianism is becoming TOTAL New Age mysticism. … Rebhahn was even talking about being the Second Coming and having “Christ Consciousness” … seriously!).
You have no clue about monadic minds if you believe them to be anything other than immaterial singularities: eternal and necessary autonomous minds, with haecceity, aseity and subjectivity, which cannot under any circumstances “melt into” other minds. But that melting drivel is the exact angle Rebhahn preaches and is fully accepted by the likes of Walters. He hates the ten coins argument because it contradicts what he himself believes about the supposed ONE MIND.
You see, we went out of our way to present this argument as simply as possible to flush out all those – like Walters – who don’t understand our system at all and are actually Hyperian, saying precisely the same things as Rebhahn.
We’ll state the situation even more simply: there are either no monads at all (as science says), or there is one monad FOREVER (One Mind is ALL, as per New Ageism and Eastern mysticism) or there are many monads forever (the Hive Mind is ALL), and of course this last one is the truth. As Leibniz, author of the MONADOLOGY said,
“It is also necessary that each monad be different from each other. For there are never two beings in nature that are perfectly alike…”
But of course, sword-swallower Corey Rebhahn and social media troll Bryan Walters think they know more about monads than the genius who fucking gave the world the original theory of monads!
I mean, the fucking sickening arrogance of these people … it defies belief!
You just can’t make this stuff up. It’s truly mind-boggling how delusional these people are. They actually believe they are smarter than Leibniz, the discoverer of calculus and one of the all-time intellectual greats! Take it from us, you Dunning-Kruger morons, you’re not smarter than Leibniz! You haven’t even read Leibniz, yet think you’re smarter than him … because, well, you’re YOU. The moment you think you are cleverer than Leibniz is the moment you should realize you are a grandiose, delusional MALIGNANT NARCISSIST AND PSYCHOPATH – like Corey Rebhahn! And like Shope, Mitchell, PUKES, Torgensen, Tyler Waffen SS, Dyslexic Fairy, Kassidy and Wonderpoop. Every single one of these people believes that Leibniz, the guy who gave the world the MONADOLOGY, was wrong about monads, and they – WOKE nutjobs with no qualifications – are right!
The reason why Hyperianism hasn’t collapsed yet is that all of Rebhahn’s cultists actually agree with his countless fallacies, and so does Bryan Waters. We must free ourselves of all these people – MANIACS. Illuminism is a meritocracy, so has no place for these people, these anti-meritocrats. These people DETEST merit. They believe that a sword swallower with no qualifications is cleverer than Leibniz.
Listen, folks, the TRUTH is in a gargantuan struggle with LIES, and the lies always have the Truth on the run in human society. Just look at mainstream religions, and just look at Hyperianism, and just look at the thoughts of Bryan Walters.
A narcissist always believes his own lies and confabulations, his own grandiose fantasies. The world is up against a PANDEMIC of these people. Corey Rebhahn is an astonishingly egregious example, but there are plenty more of these lunatics out there.
Schopenhauer gave a plausible, though false, argument that space and time introduce individuation, so, in his system, there was only one noumenal mind in the absence of space and time (the blind, purposeless, ever-striving WILL TO EXIST, which brings only suffering and misery). In fact, there’s no reason why the immaterial domain should not also support individuation and IT DOES – via MONADS! That’s exactly what monads are … individual immaterial minds outside space and time that never under any circumstances “melt together”. There’s no such thing as minds melting together. You can’t turn the heat up to make them melt together, or increase the pressure to force them together. These are eternal and necessary living beings – MINDS – and they can NEVER be squeezed into ONE MIND, and then released again by some Woke bunk about “exploring diversity”. Hyperianism is not bad philosophy. It’s not philosophy at all. It’s just made up by someone who has never studied philosophy, or anything other than perversion and self harm, in his life!
Hyperianism is absolutely LAUGHABLE. It’s the mathematical equivalent of saying that 1 + 1 = 1, i.e., one monad plus one monad = one monad (because they have allegedly melted or merged into one thing). You CANNOT make the eternal and necessary basis waves of one mind – which guarantee its subjectivity and free will – melt or merge into the eternal and necessary basis waves of a completely different mind. You would have totally changed the ontology of the monads, and totally changed and wrecked their mathematical properties and functions!
Only people who have NO CLUE AT ALL about ontological mathematics say such things as that mathematical monadic singularities – permanently discrete mathematical entities – can merge with each other to become one. Do people seriously imagine that minds can lend their thoughts, free will and subjectivity to other minds? If that were possible, why isn’t it happening RIGHT NOW. Why isn’t it happening all the time? What could possibly prevent it if this is a natural property of minds? You don’t need to wait until the end of time for minds to “melt” together if this is in fact a property of minds. It would happen constantly, and we would all be flitting in and out of each other’s thoughts and feelings and subjectivity and free will. In fact, we are hermetically sealed from all other minds in regard to our subjectivity. No other mind can EVER experience what we are experiencing.
People such as Rebhahn and Walters say that we can easily experience the subjectivity of other minds since, apparently, minds can merge and unmerge – BE ONE AND MANY – as part of their basic properties! If they could, reality would be 100% different from how we experience it, and reason and logic would be worthless!
As we all know, all of us have no idea what other people are subjectively experiencing. We don’t even know if they’re conscious! That’s why the idea of the philosophical zombie exists. Wikipedia says,
“A philosophical zombie or p-zombie argument is a thought experiment in philosophy of mind that imagines a hypothetical being that is physically identical to and indistinguishable from a normal person but does not have conscious experience, qualia, or sentience. For example, if a philosophical zombie were poked with a sharp object it would not inwardly feel any pain, yet it would outwardly behave exactly as if it did feel pain, including verbally expressing pain. Relatedly, a zombie world is a hypothetical world indistinguishable from our world but in which all beings lack conscious experience.”
So … there is no fucking thing, ontologically, as “One Mind and Many Minds” – the foundational claim now made by the sword swallower Corey Rebhahn to define Hyperianism. Even the Buddhists don’t say anything as dumb as that. They say there is a noumenal mind and many phenomenal minds. That is a plausible, though false, position. The idea that there is both a single ontological mind and a myriad of ontological individual minds is a blatant CATEGORY ERROR, and this category error is not only the foundation of Hyperianism, it is something 100% believed by Bryan Walters and his ilk, contrary to all reason and logic.
All of these people are outright enemies of the Truth. They are the opposition to human evolution. Humanity must evolve INTELLECTUALY, and these are the people preventing that. They are the Dunning-Kruger resistance to intelligence. Look at someone like Dyslexic Fairy … a moron who imagines she’s smart … for sending Hegel quotes she does not understand at all. Any more than the sword-swallower Corey Rebhahn does.
We have seen what hyper-emotionalism does to the world. We are living in the world of unbridled feelings – and contempt for intelligence. The idea of one ontological mind also being many ontological minds is hyper-emotional FANTASY. It has no basis in fact, reason and logic, and is a blatant, self-evident category error.
Remember what Bertrand Russell said:
“I would rather be reported by my bitterest enemy among philosophers than by a friend innocent of philosophy.”
We are up against our bitterest enemies among NON-Philosophers! It’s incredibly tiresome dealing with people with no grasp at all of ontological mathematics yet imposing their mad crap over it! That’s the worst of all worlds.
By the way, Bryan Walters, you say you personally dislike Rebhahn, but you are absolutely on the same page as he is regarding your total ignorance of our system and your total willingness to arrogantly state fallacies and nonsense about it, and claim we are wrong. Who the fuck do you think you are? This is the precise problem we are facing. People who just superimpose their TOTAL FALLACIES over our incredibly precise system. Unless you have studied ALL of our books, your chances of understanding our system how we understand it are vanishingly small. And if you can’t be bothered to study OUR SYSTEM, why are you even commenting on it and referring to it? Do you read a few paragraphs on M-theory and then tell M-theory experts that they don’t understand M-theory, while you know all about it (despite never having studied it)? Get over yourself!
Enough already!
SEARCH LIST: Corey Rebhahn, Morgue Official, Morgen Night, Hyperianism, Hyperionism, Hyperian, Hyperion, AMC Freakshow, Inner Star Actualization, Cult of Hyperianism, Hyperian Founder, Morgue Official Real Name, What is Hyperianism, Hyperianism Beliefs, One Mind