The Semi-Arianism Heresy and Morgue Official’s Hyperian Cult

Intellectuals like precision. That’s why most of them are drawn sooner or later to mathematics, the most precise subject of all, and the only subject that CAN offer true precision. For reality to have a precise, absolutely certain answer, it MUST be mathematical. It must be able to define itself, and all we have to do to understand reality is to know what reality’s self-definition is, and we ourselves, as part of reality, are indeed nodes of that self-definition, so there is no intractable obstacle in our path that blocks true knowledge of reality from us. Kant ludicrously invented an unknowable “thing in itself” that, obviously, could not be defined. Kant, equally ludicrously, attacked “pure reason”, and it was of course because he rejected pure reason that he could not define the thing in itself. The greatest irony of all is that the thing in itself is … PURE REASON. It’s the PSR!!! Pure reason defines ontological mathematics, and ont math rationally and logically explains EVERYTHING.

Many mystics believe in a mysterious, undefined reality without an answer. Such a reality is IMPOSSIBLE. There is no such thing as reality that is not defined, that is unknowable, that cannot be understood, that is not PRECISE. Why? Because if reality doesn’t “know” itself (remember that the ancient Greeks said KNOW THYSELF – why should it be any different for reality itself?!), then it cannot interact with itself. It wouldn’t know what to do. What would the rules, the laws, of interaction be? If there weren’t any, you would have either nothing at all, or CHAOS. You certainly couldn’t have an ordered COSMOS (the opposite of Chaos).

You cannot have “laws” in a reality that lacks definition and precision. Laws ARE that definition and precision, and the basis of all order, and the enemy of all chaos. Without laws – the source of STABILITY – you would have an infinitely unstable reality and such a reality is impossible. It would self-destruct instantly.

In ont math, all that exists are analytic sinusoids, organized monadically. One monad is one full collection of sinusoids. A monad is a mind. Why? Because sinusoids are basis thoughts and a mind is a full collection of basis thoughts, hence can think any thought by combining basis thoughts. Why are sinusoids basis THOUGHTS? It’s because they are the eternal and necessary ontological expressions of the PSR, the principle of THOUGHT, of THINKING, of MIND, of all mental activity. With these eternal and necessary expressions of the PSR, they can be combined to form temporal and contingent dynamic thoughts.

Sinusoids are of course precisely defined and have exact laws of interaction, and so, since everything is made of sinusoids, then everything always “knows” exactly what to do in ANY circumstances.

There are never any circumstances other than those of analytic sinusoids with exact sinusoidal laws! It’s literally impossible for reality at its structural, syntactic, formal level of pure math to make a single error. It is 100% syntactically perfect and that MUST be true. A single error, even the possibility of an error, would destroy reality. The error would instantly affect everything and everything would collapse in error. TOTAL SYSTEM FAILURE.

Scientists hate such ideas. Most scientists dislike certainty. Most scientists aren’t looking for an answer to everything. Science says that theories can’t be scientific unless they can be falsified or verified. They reject the PSR. They think reality is full of randomness and errors and uncertainty and chance and accident and indeterminism and emergentism and acausation – a miraculous reality with no explanation.

Why do scientists HATE the PSR? It’s because the PSR means that reality is mental! After all, the PSR is all about how reality REASONS, and that’s what a mind does … it reasons, it thinks, it experiences, it expresses subjectivity. That’s no good to scientists. Scientists love the senses because they mean that reality is material! How so? If you say that the senses are the be all and end all, you are claiming that what counts is OUT THERE (not IN HERE, as in mind and thinking), and that what’s out there is non-thought, is “stuff”, is “matter”, and is detected by the senses, and we ourselves are actually made of this “stuff”. Scientists are always focused on the external (stuff) and never on the internal (thought). They cannot conceive that stuff “out there” is simply projected from “in here”, exactly as in DREAMS. A dream doesn’t stick out of your head. It is actually contained WITHIN your mind, even though it seems to be a world outside your mind. That’s what science has never grasped: that the “external” is actually internal … it’s an internal projection but of course appears to be external because projections seem to be “out there”. Scientists – sensing types – are extraordinarily poor thinkers. They cannot conceive of dimensionality being contained by the dimensionless, even though it must be (since, by the PSR and Occam’s razor, the dimensionless is the only possible source of dimensionality … everything comes from the dimensionless point – Pythagoras knew this! They cannot conceive of the extended being INSIDE the unextended, “something” being inside “nothing” . They cannot imagine “matter” INSIDE mind. That was their fatal error. Listen folks, this ISN’T difficult. Just imagine all numbers, positive and negative, real and imaginary. Where are they? They are INSIDE their container. And what IS their container? It’s ZERO – Nothing! – the perfect balance point of somethings (numbers). Everything is INSIDE a point. The whole of reality. You cannot of course observe such a thing. But you know it MUST be true – by reason and logic, by mathematics. So, science CANNOT reveal reality – because the senses FUNDAMENTALLY DO NOT REVEAL REALITY. Reality is made of reason (ont math) and so of course only reason (ont math) reveals it! If you want to understand reality, THINK (use ont math), don’t LOOK (use science). Appearances can be deceiving! Did no one tell you?!

Remember, the scientific method begins with the command to OBSERVE, not to THINK. The Ont Math begins with thinking. What properties would reality NEED to have in order to exist?

Who gives a fuck about observation (empiricism … anti-rationalism)? “Observation” led to the claim of intrinsic ontological uncertainty and randomness even though no one ever has or ever could observe a random event. What they observe is an event and then they misinterpret it as random because they do not have a paradigm to show how it has a complete explanation by the PSR.

The PSR constitutes a hidden level of unobservable determinism, and science, by its very method, rejects the unobservable. Science can’t of course deny that unobservable things exist – its method simply, paradigmatically, can’t access any such order of existence – but it functionally acts as if science formally disproves the existence of anything unobservable: ABSENCE OF (OBSERVABLE) EVIDENCE IS EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE.

And yet science embraces unobservables such as randomness and acausation. Why? Because if it accepts THESE unobservables then it can handle them statistically and probabilistically which it LOVES doing. It does not have to accept a defined, precise analytic reality – that of ont math – which does not proceed AT ALL, is not accessed AT ALL, by way of science. It is accessed by THINKING, not the senses, by reason and logic, not the limited, fallible, unreliable, humanly evolved sensorium, which evolved for survival reasons, not truth reasons. Reason itself is our only instrument for accessing truth. It alone can allow us to interrogate the PSR, which is GOD … what reality is.

Unlike the senses, reason can access the eternal and necessary universals truths that underlie all temporal and contingent particulars and all observables. Reality in itself – noumenal reality – is not observable. Only its phenomenal effects are observable. Scientists have never grasped this simple point. Kant didn’t either.

Dunning-Kruger types couldn’t care less about precision and definition. They engage with causes because of their feelings. They have an extreme hostility to definition and precision. When have you ever heard any of the simps and gimps of the sick and sinister cult of Hyperianism demanding that their Pied Piper cult leader precisely and definitionally explain his laughable and totally false and fallacious claim that many monadic minds ontologically “collapse into unity/identity” (one monad) … a 100% impossibility. They don’t give a fuck. They couldn’t care less. Because precision and definition don’t matter a fuck to these morons. Most of them, let’s not beat about the bush, are Hyperians because they are gay, and this is their gay community.

It’s very sad that so many lgbtq individuals choose ghettos for themselves rather than adopting an inclusive, working-class identity and living in the mainstream.

Gay people of course come in all shapes and sizes and levels of intelligence, just like everyone else. A smart gay person wouldn’t touch Hyperianism with a bargepole. Those that do are Hyperians BECAUSE they are gay, not because they are smart (none of these cultists are). These Hyperian cult slaves are defined by their gayness, not by their intelligence. Their entire identity is invested in their gayness, not in their intelligence. So, they don’t care that Rebhahn is saying totally dumb things as long as he is saying totally Woke, gay things – which he is … all the time.

It’s very sad that these particular gay people are unable to go through life defined by anything other than their sexual tastes and sexual identity, but there you go. The cult leader Corey Rebhahn is 100% defined by his “non-binary”, attention-seeking variant of gayness. His invented condition of “RTS” is simply a reflection of the fact that his homophobic Christian Fundamentalist parents totally rejected him for being gay (and loving Marilyn Manson) and he had to leave and get a foster family. His whole life is defined by that fact and his lust for revenge against family, normality, heterosexuality, the neurotypical, and, of course, Christianity. The whole of Hyperianism is just an insane claim that gay people are the master race and this is somehow supposed to be proved by monads and ont math. AS IF!

Hopefully, we will reach a world where gay people are “incidentally” gay, meaning that they define themselves as anything other than gay, just as you don’t find heterosexual people going around identifying as heterosexual. They just ARE heterosexual. And gay people just ARE homosexual. Big deal. No one needs to bang on about it, yet that’s all that the Woke community ever does, and it is the entire basis of Hyperianism. Corey Rebhahn’s whole mad shtick has fuck all to do with “understanding reality” and is 100% about promoting the word “DIVERSITY“. What the fuck has that got to do with explaining reality? Yet 100% of the Hyperian cult slaves are Hyperians BECAUSE they are there to support and promote diversity. The idea that these people have any interest in the technical details of monads and ont math is for the birds. They are morons. So is their cult leader Corey Rebhahn, a man with no education and no qualifications, who has struggled all of his life with being gay because he was unfortunate enough to have parents who totally demonized homosexuality as an unforgivable sin (within the Christian paradigm).

Last summer, when we totally denounced Rebhahn and his cult, his only sane move was to fuck off from our system and set up a Woke, gay community talking about RTS and its connection to homosexuality, or whatever … and that might well have worked out OK for him. But we know what he did instead last summer … DOUBLED DOWN. So here we all are.

This guy is a total clown suffering from severe delusions and limitless grandiosity. He is a malignant narcissist and psychopath incapable of admitting the truth – he will go on lying until Doomsday. That’s why the internet is full of channels warning everyone about these pathological narcissists. They are incredibly dangerous individuals and their lust for attention, for narcissistic supply, means they are taking over social media. A war should be waged against “influencers”. More or less 100% of these people are Dunning-Kruger malignant narcissists. They are lowering the IQ of humanity and wrecking the cohesion of society. Just look at Hyperianism, a non-binary lgbtq supremacist hate group, campaigning against normality and heterosexuality and the neurotypical. A literally insane group of Woke fanatics.

What does all of this have to do with “Semi-Arianism”? Well, this Christian heresy is all about the theological importance of the words used to describe ultimate reality (“God”). You were a heretic if you used the word “homoiousios”, but not if you used the very similar word “homoousios”. These Christians actually cared what they were signing up to. They wanted precision. They were totally unlike Hyperians who only care about a non-binary man telling them that they are “World Shapers”. As if! They couldn’t care less what he technically says. None of them is listening and none of them has the intellect to grasp that he is talking laughable, total shit all the time. Why wouldn’t he be talking crap – he’s a hairdresser FFS!

Wikipedia says,

“Semi-Arianism was a position regarding the relationship between God the Father and the Son of God, adopted by some 4th-century Christians. Though the doctrine modified the teachings of Arianism, it still rejected the doctrine that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are co-eternal, and of the same substance, or consubstantial, and was therefore considered to be heretical by many contemporary Christians.”

So, Arianism was an earlier heresy and involved the logical denial that God the Son could be of the “same substance” as God the Father since the Father obviously preceded the Son and made the Son, hence the Father was of an eternal and necessary substance, while the Son was a temporal and contingent substance.

Arianism was condemned, but didn’t go away. It reappeared in a modified way, offering a kind of diplomatic compromise to the Trinitarian Christians so that everyone could live together.

Wikipedia says,

“Arius held that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit were three separate essences or substances (ousia) and that the Son and Spirit derived their divinity from the Father, were created, and were inferior to the Godhead of the Father. Semi-Arians asserted that the Son was “of a similar substance” (homoiousios) as the Father but not “of the same substance” (homoousios).”

So, the Arians insisted that the Son and Spirit were of a totally different substance from each other and from the Father (heteroousios). The Semi-Arians held out an olive branch by saying that the three Gods were all of similar substance (homoiousios) but, crucially, not the same substance (homoousios). Many Christians weren’t too bothered by the distinction (“similar” or “same”) and went along with it for a while. But of course the hardline Trinitarians understood perfectly well that their DEFINITION of God was under total threat and Christianity was being turned from a monotheism into a triadic polytheism.

Wikipedia says,

“Arianism was the view of Arius and his followers, the Arians, that Jesus was subordinate to, and of a different being (ousia) to God the Father. Arians opposed the view that the three persons of the Trinity were of one being or substance. Arianism spread among the Church of Alexandria and the Eastern Mediterranean. After the First Council of Nicaea condemned Arianism as heresy, many Christians adopted compromise views in which they remained in communion with Arians without adopting Arianism itself. Various formulae, such as the homoiousian and the homoean, were proposed to compromise between Arian teachings (heteroousios) and the doctrine of one substance (homoousios) asserted in the Nicene Creed.”

Both the Arians and Trinitarians were extremists. The Semi-Arians were moderators, seeking compromise.

The Arians didn’t like Semi-Arianism. Wikipedia says,

“The Third Council of Sirmium in 357 was the high point of Arianism. The Seventh Arian Confession (Second Sirmium Confession) held that both homoousios (of one substance) and homoiousios (of similar substance) were unbiblical and that the Father is greater than the Son. (This confession was later known as the Blasphemy of Sirmium.)”

As we saw in another post, the heretic Sabellius favored the “one substance” formula, but denied that Father, Son and Spirit were different “persons”. Rather, they were three different modes of the Oneness, different masks it wore in different circumstances. Wikipedia says,

“This was because Sabellius also considered the Father and the Son to be ‘one substance’, meaning that, to Sabellius, the Father and Son were ‘one essential Person’ interacting with creation as necessary.”

So, you can see how everything depends on precise definitions.

In ont math, you must be a supporter of monadic FUNCTIONAL UNITY, while a supposed monadic ONTOLOGICAL UNITY (One Monad, One Mind) is completely incompatible with ont math – yet this is exactly what Corey Rebhahn preaches. He does so because he has zero interest in, and comprehension of, the precise technical details of ont math. For Rebhahn, the whole game is to reach the Woke conclusion that we are all the same but different, One and Many, a Unity/Identity and a Multiplicity/Particularization supporting “diversity” and difference”.

Rebhahn has zero intellectual integrity and zero interest in precision, definition and technical coherence. He despises the Truth. He is a Word Salad conman and he states whatever it is necessary to state to secure narcissistic supply, adoration and money. He has no respect at all for the truth. He couldn’t care less. He would lose all of his cultists if he ever told them the truth (assuming he was even equipped to know what it is, which he isn’t – this fake human has a FALSE SELF), so he never will. He knows they want to hear the Woke “One and Many” mantra, and he believes, completely fallaciously, that this “logically” justifies Woke “diversity”, and that is his entire game … to say that reality is all about supporting and “enjoying” diversity. This is absolute nonsense, totally contrary to human evolution, human nature, human history and the brutal Hegelian dialectic. It’s a total fantasy, but Rebhahn knows that his lgbtq cult extremists love this fantasy and will pay him and love him to keep repeating this fantasy to them. They don’t want to engage with reality. They hate it. And malignant narcs such as Rebhahn know this when they are cynically and self-servingly manipulating and exploiting suckers by telling them the lies and fantasies they want to hear.

These people have complete contempt for the truth. They are a menace, spreading misinformation and disinformation. They are blocking the truth from getting out there.

Wayne Jamieson said to Morgy Porgy,

“Stay off meth, and talk about something else.”

Word!

Joanna Laguna said,

“@Chris Riker, I don’t support you any less as a matter of fact. I’m not your or Morgue’s sheep. I’m learning from everyone, from the WHOLE picture encompassing Hyperianism and Illuminism. Don’t be so quick to judge me by the way I make it to Morgue’s streams. I have been reading your ‘blood, sweat, and tears’ as well. I’m free to contemplate your thoughts without having to be called out and reprimanded for merely holding space in my head for you all. Are you mad at me for getting your book and reading it? I should think not…”

This is the sort of mind-boggling, totally delusional crap these Hyperian cult slaves come out with. This person is literally portraying herself as one of the IGNAVI – someone refusing to choose a side in a moral war. JFK said, “The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who in time of moral crisis preserve their neutrality.”

You cannot sit on the fence here. You MUST choose. You must exercise your moral judgment … and you are totally immoral if you support the criminal Corey Rebhahn, the sick leader of the degenerate Hyperian cult. This man talks about compassion and unity yet SWATTED three innocent people and tried to get the AC shut down. What don’t you fucking get about that?

No decent, moral person could support this fucking monster. Only evil people are Hyperians. And they are all compulsive liars. EVERYONE knows that Joanna Laguna is a fanatical supporter and worshiper of Corey Rebhahn and his repulsive Hyperian cult, continuously commenting on him and cheering him on and supporting him in every way she can, and has never once supported Illuminism and would never in a trillion years challenge Rebhahn and question him about his FBI complaint, for example. She knows that if she ever did, her membership of the cult would be over.

She is a SLAVE.

We fucking detest these people. They are everything we loathe and reject. They are a simply enormous obstacle to human evolution, entirely led by their irrational feelings and incapable of exercising moral judgment.

Humanity has the most enormous problem confronting it. If we are to advance as a species, we must pass judgment on what it means to be human and start creating institution that eliminate huge swathes of human behavior, those that support the kind of humanity that endorses celebrity culture, influencer culture, hyper-emotionalism, “all paths and all truths”, and Woke “diversity” … everything that Hyperians are all about.

GET FUCKING REAL.

Humanity can only transform itself if it takes out the trash, and it must have people with the will, courage and intelligence to do so. Humanity must be CORRECTED. Otherwise, we face total system failure. Cults such as Hyperianism – hyper dumb fucks – are an extinction level event for human evolution. They are regression itself. Just fucking look at the specimens that remain in this nauseating Hyperian cult … the totally bungled and botched. Could humanity sink any lower? This is actual degeneration we are looking at, the Idiocracy in full color.

We must embrace Nietzsche’s illiberalism and total hatred of the LAST MAN … you need only look at Hyperianism to see how close humanity is to succumbing to the Last Man and repudiating the Superman totally. We cannot allow that to happen. We cannot have a Woke kumbaya world. Humanity should perish if it chooses the Abyss.

“I know my fate. One day my name will be associated with the memory of something tremendous — a crisis without equal on earth, the most profound collision of conscience, a decision that was conjured up against everything that had been believed, demanded, hallowed so far. I am no man, I am dynamite.” ― Friedrich Nietzsche

Revalue all values!