The Shamrock and Morgue Official’s Hyperian Cult

Long ago, Saint Patrick “explained” the concept of the Christian Trinity, using a … SHAMROCK. Shannon Whitmore said, “The Trinity can be a very difficult concept to teach to children, but there are a variety of analogies that can be used. Even full-grown adults have had great difficulty understanding the Trinity, and it will always remain one of the greatest (if not THE greatest) mysteries of our faith. How can there be three Persons, but only one God? How can we believe that God is a Trinity, that He is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, but still claim to believe in only one God? How is it that there are three Persons, but not three gods? How can the Father, Son, and Spirit be distinct figures with unique roles in salvation history, but not separate entities? And how can we explain this to our students when we don’t fully understand the Trinity ourselves? … Children are not the only ones who have needed some sort of symbol to better understand the Trinity. Centuries ago, St. Patrick used the shamrock to explain the Trinity to the people of Ireland. They had never heard of the Trinity, and could not understand how there could be three Persons in one God, rather than three gods, and so St. Patrick devised a way to explain this mystery to them. Every shamrock has three distinct leaves, but they are all part of the shamrock. This simple explanation won an entire nation to Christ.”

An “explanation”? That shamrock business doesn’t explain ANYTHING. It doesn’t even touch on the issue. It has literally no connection to how three independent “persons” can be one God. It’s not as if the three leaves can go off on their own and do stuff, while always being ONE, and then all come back again. That really would be impressive!

But this gibberish reminded us of none other than Brody Rebhahn trying to explain how we are all supposedly “One and Many”. Rebhahn simply replaced St Patrick’s shamrock with a “circle of circles”, or, alternatively, with “the flower of life”, so beloved by New Age Woke mystics with a penchant for “sacred geometry”.

So, St. Patrick said there were three leaves in one plant and so, somehow, that meant there were three persons in one God. Don’t think so, mate! (And the other monotheists, the Jews and the Muslims certainly didn’t think so!) It’s amazing how people fall for transparent nonsense. Take any three people and then claim that they are actually one entity, one “God”. No one’s going to swallow that. What does it even mean?

Hilariously, Brody Rebhahn (Morgue Official) made a vastly more absurd claim than St. Patrick. He said that everyone is actually one entity, one “Absolute” … GOD. Imagine a shamrock with infinite leaves!!! We are all separate persons, but we are all actually ONE – somehow. And then Rebhahn came up with a piece of nonsense that even outdid St. Patrick. Due to a simply catastrophic failure to understand “Leibniz’s law”, Rebhahn claimed (if we use this shamrock analogy) that if you placed all of the infinite leaves of our special shamrock on top of each other, they would all dissolve into one leaf!!! Thus proving that we are all One and Many. Supposedly.

So, according to Rebhahn, if you superimposed God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit over each other, and they were in “perfect synchronization” then they would become One God!!! Ta da. But then, if “God” “introduced difference to explore diversity, multiplicity and particularization” then the three “persons” would miraculously reappear exactly as they were before. Who knew?! Not even Christians say things as mad as that.

This is all comedic, but Rebhahn seriously stated drivel like this to his Hyperian cult slaves … and they all unconditionally accepted it and believed it and hailed Rebhahn as a genius explaining fundamental reality. They still do.

Rebhahn has been refuted in every possible way, but his cult slaves go on believing all the absolute idiocy he keeps spouting. They are exactly the same as Abrahamists. No matter how many time you disprove what these people believe, they go on believing anyway. Nothing will persuade them that their God Rebhahn is wrong. They believe he is infallible and makes ex cathedra statements that cannot be challenged by any mortal mind. They have unconditional faith in him. They are immune to facts, logic, reason, technical arguments, philosophical literacy concerning Leibniz’s law, and so on. They just don’t care. Like Abrahamists, they prefer their faith to rationalism, while actually claiming to be guided by logic and reason at all times. Ho, ho, ho.

Not one of them can explain how Rebhahn is right about his One and Many idiocy, but they all go on believing it anyway. Back in the day, they would all be Christian Trinitarians, fully accepting the shamrock analogy, just as they now fully accept Rebhahn’s “flower of life” shtick – which is just the same thing, but with more components. They all believe as gospel truth what Rebhahn fallaciously and absurdly said about Leibniz’s law … even though absolutely anyone can look up Leibniz’s law for themselves and know that Rebhahn got it spectacularly wrong.

Do these people have a total aversion to doing research and actually investigating the extraordinary claims made by their God? Carl Sagan said that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”. But not if you’re a Hyperian. You just believe whatever extraordinary claim Morgue Official makes without blinking. You make zero attempt to research it and study the criticism and falsification of his claims. You just ignore all of that, and call the critics haters, bigots and Nazis. So, everything that unWoke people say is automatically FALSE, while everything that Woke people say is automatically TRUE, and the more Woke and exotic you are, the more TRUTHFUL you are – that’s the gospel of the Hyperians. They decide truth issues on the basis of how Woke the person making the claims is, as opposed to anything actually to do with, you know, THE TRUTH. They are hyper emotionalists in other words, who assess truth content via their feelings towards people. They do not engage thinking – reason and logic – at all. They HATE thinking, as all Hyperians demonstrate over and over again in their “chat”.

Technically, all monadic minds are unique substances, meaning that each of them depends on nothing else for its existence. Each could exist entirely on its own since it does not require anything else for its existence. Could God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit each exist entirely on their own? No, they couldn’t – because they are defined as ONE GOD, hence have absolute interdependence.

Rebhahn, however, claimed that monadic minds can become so “perfectly synchronized” that, ontologically, they become ONE UNIVERSAL MIND, which would of course entail that they were not unique substances at all but interdependencies (as in the Trinity), contrary to their core definition.

A cretinous Hyperian fanatic called Luis Loretto said, “We remain mentally different because we all have our own experiences which shape us who we are to be in the physical domain. What makes the same is that we all consist of the same energy.”

You see, this is exactly the uninformed garbage these people come out with. They have no clue what they are saying. They don’t understand monads at all, and don’t understand ont math at all. The whole point of ont math is that every monad is eternal and necessary (i.e., each is a unique substance with its own haecceity and aseity), and its mathematical energy belongs exclusively to it forever. But apes like Luis Loretto – who are even dumber than Rebhahn, which is why they follow him! – just come along spouting their New Age gibberish about “we’re all one energy but we differ because of our experiences”. If we’re all one energy then we’re ONE MIND and that means we all share our experiences. Self-evidently, we don’t. Our subjective experiences, and thus our individual energy, are OURS and ours alone. No one else can ever experience what we individually experience. It’s exactly because of this that we have FREE WILL. We can freely respond to what we ourselves have experienced without ANY involvement from anything else.

These Hyperian fanatics have completely bizarre, childish ideas in their heads – which have zero connection to ont math – and Rebhahn feeds all of this nonsense that they believe with similar Woke, New Age, mystical nonsense. That’s why he dragged in the flower of life. He knew how popular that would be with his idiot audience.

Our experiences ARE energy! There is nothing other than energy. Energy = sinusoidal waves. And 100% of reality is energy, which is to say sinusoidal waves, which are basis thoughts. Nothing else exists. There are just independent sinusoids and their mathematical combinations (which are temporal and contingent dependencies) … there are just basis thoughts and their combinations! That’s it.

There aren’t “experiences” that somehow differ from energy. But Rebhahn doesn’t understand ont math and thus never explains it correctly. Because he gets everything wrong, he encourages stupid people to believe whatever stupid, Woke, New Age nonsense floats their boat. So people such as the Hyperian fanatic we mentioned – and we’ve heard the Immense Fatness of Jan saying exactly the same thing – claim (without using any technical language, natch) that there is a Cartesian substance dualism of experiences/subjectivity and objective mathematics.

The Blob literally said,

“… mathematics cannot be applied to subjectivity and subjective experiences.”

So, this slobby Blob literally claims to believe in an exclusively mathematical reality and then claims that mathematics cannot explain subjectivity and subjective experiences, and so she is DENYING that this is an exclusively mathematical reality! Our entire subjective reality is, according to this moron, non-mathematical. So how can it coexist with and interact with objective mathematical reality, you retard? Tumbleweed.

One of the main anti-Trinitarian heresies was called Sabellianism. Wikipedia says, “In Christianity, Sabellianism is the Western Church equivalent to Patripassianism in the Eastern Church, which are both forms of theological modalism. Condemned as heresy, Modalism is the belief that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are three different modes of God, as opposed to a Trinitarian view of three distinct persons within the Godhead. … According to modalism and Sabellianism, God is said to be only one person who reveals himself in different ways called modes, faces, aspects, roles or masks (Greek πρόσωπα prosopa; Latin personae) of the One God, as perceived by the believer, rather than three co-eternal persons within the Godhead, or a ‘co-equal Trinity’. Modalists note that the only number expressly and repeatedly ascribed to God in the Old Testament is One, do not accept interpreting this number as denoting union (i.e. Gen 2:24) when it is applied to God, and dispute the meaning or validity of related New Testament passages cited by Trinitarians.”

So, why doesn’t Morgy Porgy claim that there is only a Universal Mind which reveals itself through countless masks (personae)? That still accommodates his “One and Many” and “Unity exploring Diversity” spiel.

Andy Weir’s “Egg” Philosophy, based on Weir’s short story, says something just like that. Wikipedia says, “The story is about the main character, who is referred to as ‘you’ (in the second person), and God, who is ‘me’ (in the first person).”

Here’s how Weir’s story concludes (“God” is talking to his child – who is all of humanity, which, as it turns out, is actually just one person!)

=====

I looked you in the eye.

“The meaning of life, the reason I made this whole universe, is for you to mature.”
“You mean mankind? You want us to mature?”
“No, just you. I made this whole universe for you. With each new life you grow and mature and become a larger and greater intellect.”
“Just me? What about everyone else?”
“There is no one else,” I said. “In this universe, there’s just you and me.”
You stared blankly at me. “But all the people on earth…”
“All you. Different incarnations of you.”
“Wait. I’m everyone!?”
“Now you’re getting it,” I said, with a congratulatory slap on the back.
“I’m every human being who ever lived?”
“Or who will ever live, yes.”
“I’m Abraham Lincoln?”
“And you’re John Wilkes Booth, too,” I added.
“I’m Hitler?” You said, appalled.
“And you’re the millions he killed.”
“I’m Jesus?”
“And you’re everyone who followed him.”
You fell silent.
“Every time you victimized someone,” I said, “you were victimizing yourself. Every act of kindness you’ve done, you’ve done to yourself. Every happy and sad moment ever experienced by any human was, or will be, experienced by you.”
You thought for a long time.
“Why?” You asked me. “Why do all this?”
“Because someday, you will become like me. Because that’s what you are. You’re one of my kind. You’re my child.”
“Whoa,” you said, incredulous. “You mean I’m a god?”
“No. Not yet. You’re a fetus. You’re still growing. Once you’ve lived every human life throughout all time, you will have grown enough to be born.”

==================

You could easily imagine Rebhahn supporting Egg “philosophy” (he probably will in due course!). “We” are all One and only seem to be Many … We are One with the mere appearance of Many. We are One wearing many masks, as in the Sabellian heresy.

And, if you follow through the “logic” of the Egg story, the “God” in the story is actually just the same person too, and so we are dealing with pure SOLIPSISM

I mean, come on folks, you can Word Salad your way to any conclusion you like with this New Age, Woke bullshit. The whole point of it is to establish EMOTIONAL RAPPORT. It has zero to do with THINKING.

No Hyperian has a clue what Rebhan is saying and they just superimpose their existing New Age, Woke beliefs over what he claims, just as the Fatness of Jan does, and in fact just as Rebhahn himself did to ont math. Rebhahn at no stage understood ont math – way too complex for someone like that. Remember what Bertrand Russel said: “A stupid man’s report of what a clever man says is never accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something that he can understand.” This process is happening ALL THE TIME and is directly connected to the Dunning-Kruger effect. When intelligent people talk to stupid people, the stupid people hear the intelligent content STUPIDLY and turn it into something stupid, just as Brody Rebhahn turned Illuminism into something stupid (Woke Hyperianism). And when stupid people hear stupid Rebhahn’s stupid Hyperianism they impose their own stupidity on that too, and everything just gets more and more stupid in an incredible stupidity feedback loop – exactly as we see in the Hyperian “chat” … the Dumbageddon!

A relevant psychology experiment is the “War of the Ghosts” by Frederic Bartlett. Wikipedia says, “The ‘War of the Ghosts’ experiment from ‘Remembering’ (1932) was Bartlett’s most famous study and demonstrated the reconstructive nature of memory, and how it can be influenced by the subject’s own schema. A memory is constructive when a person gives their opinion about what had happened in the memory, along with additional influences such as their experiences, knowledge, and expectations. In the experiment, Bartlett assigned his Edwardian English participants to read the Native American Folklore titled ‘War of the Ghosts’. Participants were told to remember the story at extended intervals numerous times. Bartlett found that at longer intervals between reading the story and remembering it, participants were less accurate and forgot much of the information from the story. Most importantly, where the elements of the story failed to fit into the schemata of the listener, these elements were omitted from the recollection, or transformed into more familiar forms. Each participant’s report of the story mirrored his or her own culture, Edwardian English culture in this case. An example of this can be demonstrated by some of these participants remembering ‘canoes’ from the story as ‘boats’.”

When highly educated people say things, they are talking from the perspective of their high education. When poorly educated people hear this same material, they do not have the benefit of the extensive education, so they interpret what they hear according to their own schema, which is of course that of a poorly educated person. Someone such as Corey Rebhahn cannot understand sophisticated philosophy. He simply lacks the education and core intelligence. He converts everything he hears into what he can make sense of, according to his fundamentalist Christian bible thumping upbringing. Rebhahn ONLY understands Christianity. That was the only thing he was ever taught!

We encounter our work being misinterpreted all the time. Because what we say is not what other people hear. They hear and understand according to their own schemas. The only people who can grasp what we’re saying (even if they don’t have the same educational background to refer to) are those with a high core intelligence or who are highly intuitive. It’s amazing how far good intuition can take you when you encounter an unfamiliar subject. Mike Hockney wrote the God Series from as intuitive a point of view as he could, using many different perspectives and thought experiments and treating the same material from all sorts of different angles to give “newcomers” a way into this complex material without having an extensive background in math, philosophy and science. Some people have grasped the material incredibly well … others, well not so much. Rebhahn didn’t get the material … he was extremely highly motivated to try to get the material to fit his theories regarding non-binary supremacy! Fat Jan was the same. These people LOVED monads because they saw them as justifying non-binaryism!

What these people wanted above all was to deny fixed genders, and they saw monads as their escape route. So, it was their gender dysfunction that brought them into our orbit because they saw monads as genderless and thus perfect for promoting a non-binary, anti-gender metaphysics.

The Hyperian shtick says that we all have a “monadic non-binary perspective” and we can use this to explore gender in whatever way we like in the “avatar perspective”, and we must never hate each other and must instead accept, respect and celebrate each other “in our diversity and multiplicity” by way of the “absolute perspective”, which claims that we are all ONE MIND. As you can see, that’s just New Age, Woke crap transplanted onto analytic ont math by a person absolutely obsessed with his own non-binary designation, which he believes constitutes a “hyperaware “viewpoint, uniting male and female “energies”, and making him a person of perfect androgynous balance. Yawn.

The whole game of Hyperianism is to deny or devalue evolution, biology, and gender in order to promote some supposed non-binary view of monads. While it’s true that monads are GODS in their eternal and necessary state of Being and don’t think about evolution, becoming, gender, biology or physicality at all, that’s not at all true in the domain of Becoming. Every monad in that domain IS gendered. Why? Because they constantly link to biological, gendered bodies and, in the vast majority of cases, they develop a preference for being male or female. As you would expect, it’s an effectively fifty-fifty split. You could even give a simple explanation of transgenderism by asserting that a transgender woman, for example, is a monad with a female orientation that, by accident or some unfortunate set of circumstances, ended up linked to a biological male body, and of course they will therefore feel very alien with respect to that body and seek to bring about a more female orientation for themselves. Of course, other explanations are eminently possible, but this is a simple explanation based on an acquired gendered mode of monadic existence – totally contrary to what Brody, Fat Jan and their Hyperian cultists want to believe! At all times they want to reject the reality of gender and just turn it into a game that can be constantly experimented with “in its diversity and multiplicity”.

IghtbetDM said to Morgy Porgy,

“Scammer already took 200$ from me saying it was you that you need help to buy a new camera I did cause I love your YouTube channel❤”

That made us laugh. Mate, you’re scammed every time you watch Rebhahn! Rebhahn himself – who gets about $300,000 per annum from his grift, from his suckers – pleaded for donations … to ALLOW HIM TO BUY A NEW CAMERA!!!

You got your karma, mate!

Here’s Brody in his Edgelord Morgue mode:

https://www.facebook.com/MorgueOfficial/videos/1019632368076088

Hey, all you Hyperians … is THIS version of Morgy Porgy the real Morgy Porgy, or is it the insufferable, sanctimonious Woke Jesus Morgy Porgy who appears in the deadstreams that is the real Morgy Porgy? Don’t you cretins get it that this person is highly dissociated and capable of presenting totally false alters to you, while concealing his true host? Well, when we say “true” host, we are of course referring to Rebhahn’s malignant narc False Self, which killed off Rebhahn’s true self because it couldn’t cope with reality and had to be replaced by a fantasy version of Rebhahn – you know, just like in Rebhahn’s favorite movie – the NEVERENDING STORY!

It was that movie that gave Rebhahn’s psyche the clue it needed to escape from reality and turn to a False Self living in a fantasy world.

Wikipedia says,

“[The movie] follows a boy who finds a magical book that tells of a young warrior who is given the task of stopping the Nothing, a dark force, from engulfing the wonderland world of Fantasia.”

Rebhahn lives in Fantasia (Hyperia) and views reality as the Nothing, the dark force always threatening to overwhelm him. In the story, the boy has no mother … that must have made a huge impression on Brody junior since he in effect had totally rejected his mother (just as she had totally rejected him!).

Hyperianism is pure fantasy that attracts total fantasists. Reality will crush this nauseating cult.