Dumb and Dumber: Morgue Official and His Hyperian Cult Slaves

Did you see the deadstream by Dr. Evil and the talking tar pit? That was a bad mistake. It showed you the GULF between smart people and dumb people commenting on smart people. Why waste any time watching a carpet cleaner and a rich retiree talking about the work of Donald Hoffman when you could just watch Donald Hoffman? If you want a smart take on idealism, watch Bernardo Kastrup. Don’t watch the hair dresser Corey Rebhahn. You will get smart by watching smart people. You will get dumber if you watch dumb people not understanding smart people. Never forget what Bertrand Russell said, “A stupid man’s report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand.”

Take that VERY seriously. If you are not listening to qualified people, you will get a stupid person’s take on what qualified people say. And it will be totally wrong, and even dangerously wrong.

On that note, let’s take you through more of Corey Rebhahn’s stupid comments on a supposed ontological “One Mind”.

Rebhahn said,

“It’s a mathematical component of the system to be able to explore itself in diversity and multiplicity.”

The system isn’t “exploring “itself. Would anyone say that the weather, the climate, is “exploring itself”, that it’s “expressing its diversity”? Rebhahn constantly deploys extreme anthropomorphism regarding reality. This is the CARDINAL SIN. The task is to do the exact opposite … remove all traces of the human condition from the explanation of reality. But CON MEN are experts at inserting human lies into “explanations” of things in order to manipulate and exploit gullible, credulous humans. An extreme feeling type ONLY accepts human lies. Because they can only relate to lies. How can an extreme feeling type have any relationship at all with a 100% unemotional, absolute Truth of a purely conceptual nature? And where is the scope for a conman to exploit something that has no emotional properties?

The eternal and necessary domain of Being necessarily projects a secondary domain – that of temporal and contingent Becoming – and has absolutely no choice in this … the mathematics mandates it. It’s not as if it’s some creature saying, “Oh, you know what, Id’ love to explore diversity. … yes, that’s what I must do!” WTF!

Rebhahn said,

“And reality is this process … reality is a cyclical process. It’s a One Mind which is also a multiplicity of minds.”

That’s a category error. It’s either One Mind or there are many minds. It can’t be both. That’s ontologically, mathematically, impossible. To be precise, you can’t have one monad that is also many monads. You can’t have many minds vanishing (“collapsing”) into one mind (into an “identity”) and then extracting themselves. You can’t have Many Minds also being One Mind. They are Many Minds OR there is One Mind. This is simple logic, folks! Even the term “reality is a cyclical process” implies, in Rebhahn’s usage, that sometimes there are Many Minds and sometimes there is One Mind, so there is no question of any eternal minds (either Many or One); there is a temporal One Mind, and then it is succeeded by temporal Many Minds, and then they are succeeded by the temporal One Mind, and so on. So, an ontological phase transition is taking place: many minds VANISH to create One Mind, and then the One Mind VANISHES, to be replaced by Many Minds. But One Mind CANNOT ontologically create Many Minds, and Many Minds cannot ontologically create One Mind, so Rebhahn’s whole system is strictly impossible.

Rebhahn said,

“… exploring itself in diversity and multiplicity cyclically…”

You see the game here is to state that Reality is ABOUT “exploring diversity and multiplicity” and this is somehow supposed to metaphysically vindicate Wokeness and exotic minorities and extreme individualists! This is all to justify Corey Rebhahn’s choices and tastes, beliefs and opinions and political stances, and those of all other Woke nutjobs. The mathematical monadic Hive Mind literally metaphysically refutes that entire false position, hence why Rebhahn HATES the Hive Mind.

Rebhahn said,

“So at the Big Bang it was a unity but the Big Bang gives rise to a diversity and then at the end of time it collapses back into a unity or an identity and then there will be a new Big Bang.”

Rebhahn describes this in terms of an ontological process. It’s not. The ontological core of reality NEVER alters. There is a permanent zero-entropy state (Being), which NEVER collapses into anything ever and remains what it is permanently. And this perfect domain of minds – “God”, the Hive Mind, the Absolute, the functional Unity of all monads – generates, via ontological Fourier mathematics, a secondary domain of Becoming. It is the secondary domain that is cyclical. The primary domain – the “Creator” – is the opposite! But Rebhahn doesn’t grasp any of this – because he’s a hard dresser! 1 + 1 = 2.

Let’s look at the key error Rebhahn keeps making as he desperately tries to justify involving Leibniz’s law – a simply fatal error, which he actually imagined was an astonishing, genius insight (hence he cannot now backtrack on it)! So, at one point, he refers to a “functional” unity but now he refers to unity as an “identity” and that means he is referring to an ONTOLOGICAL Unity (since only an ontological unity can be an “identity”), not a FUNCTIONAL Unity (where many non-identical things are in the same functional state … they are NOT an identity!).

So, Rebhahn literally keeps swapping his language to disguise that he’s talking total nonsense. This is pure Word Salad and Rebhahn hopes that no one notices, and of course his groomed, brainwashed worshipers are too dumb and starstruck to notice ANYTHING. They couldn’t follow our precise arguments even if we sent them super chats! (Ho, ho, ho).

Rebhahn said,

“So we go through this process of unity and identity to multiplicity, diversity and particularization.”

That is literally an ontological category error. It’s impossible in every conceivable way. There is NEVER any ontological “unity/identity”, and Rebhahn is just wickedly lying to people to extract what he wants from them – narcissistic supply … worship. He will tell these people whatever they want to hear and dress it up as fancily as he can to dupe them, con them and grift from them.

Rebhahn said,

“When we all exist in this state of unity, identity, we are God.”

Notice that Rebhahn says “when” we are in this state, meaning that it is a temporal process. If it’s an eternal state, we are ALWAYS in it. Yet sometimes Rebhahn says we are ALWAYS One and Many, while at other times he is saying that we are SOMETIMES One (in the state of “collapse”, in an “identity”) and at other times we are Many (in the state of “expansion”, in a “non-identity”). And Rebhahn continuously switches between these two utterly contradictory claims!

There is in any case no such ontological state as ontological monadic “identity”. There is functional identity between ontologically different monads, simply meaning that the internal state of each individual monad is the same (as we might say that identical twins are in the same genetic state), not meaning that the monads themselves are the same (the identical twins aren’t the same). We are never anything other than a HIVE MIND, a collection of monads … not a singular ontological monad. THERE IS NO ONTOLOGICAL IDENTITY.

Everything that Rebhahn says about “God” is FALSE. “God” is Being, the Absolute, and that is the zero-entropy state where all the monadic minds are in the same functional state, hence form a functional, but not ontological, unity. And that completely contradicts EVERYTHING THAT Rebhahn claims. He NEEDS an ontological unity for his Woke spiel, and that’s exactly why he fallaciously invoked Leibniz’s law … because it concerns “identity”. But Rebhahn simply got hopelessly confused by what Leibniz meant by Leibniz’s law! Because Rebhahn is stupid!

Rebhahn said,

“We are the Absolute. We are a Subjectivity.” So this is a literal ontological claim. Apparently, at one point (or all the time!), there is only ONE subjectivity and that is not our individual subjectivity and so we do not exist. But Rebhahn doesn’t want to tell you that you don’t exist so he immediately comes out with his next line…

Rebhahn said,

“We then express ourselves in multiplicity.” Have you spotted the foundational logical error? There is no “us”, there is no “we” … so “we” are not expressing ourselves in any way. The claim is that the mysterious One Mind – which is none of us, is doing this. It, as a completely separate mind with its own agency and subjectivity, is doing so – but then Rebhahn claims that THIS IS US. In fact, it’s the exact ABSENCE of us. But what does Rebhahn care? He has zero interest in the Truth and absolute interest in lying, to secure narcissistic supply. And he has plenty of brainwashed cretins who eagerly swallow all of his philosophically illiterate garbage!

You cannot call yourself a truth seeker and truth teller and someone explaining the nature of existence, and then just blatantly lie to people, but Rebhahn is a malignant narcissist and all he cares about is being worshipped by suckers, and he will invent any story that he thinks will impress these idiots. He’s a sophist, the opposite of a philosopher. He says what he needs to say to get money and fame. He will NEVER tell the truth. Philosophers are interested in the truth. Rebhahn isn’t a philosopher! He’s a guy who cuts hair and used to work in a beauty parlor (he’s a somatic narcissist).

Rebhahn said,

“All of these minds are eternal. They don’t disappear, they never go away.”

That’s the definition of a monadic HIVE MIND! The existence of which Rebhahn denies!

Rebhahn said,

“But they have the capacity to enter into different states: of unity or multiplicity.”

How many times must we say this … that’s a CATEGORY ERROR! You cannot be an eternal mind – an individual subjectivity and agent – and also a One Mind, a one cosmic subjectivity and one cosmic agent. That is metaphysically and mathematically IMPOSSIBLE. But it is the exact foundation of Hyperianism, essential to the whole scam. It’s Wokeness turned into a “philosophy”. The game is to say that we are ONE and that we are exploring Diversity and therefore no one should be bothered about diversity because it’s just a Oneness that is doing the exploring. So, Rebhahn literally spouts a category error to try to justify his laughable Woke dogmatism and claim it is in encoded in reality! How deceitful can you get? Hitler talked about the BIG LIE, and that’s what malignant narcissists such as Rebhahn specialize in … the BIG LIE purporting to be the BIG TRUTH. It’s DISGUSTING! It’s the opposite of philosophy. It’s nauseating sophistry to scam intellectual cripples.

Rebhahn said,

“So this is how we can be One and Many.”

Note the strange use of the word “can”. We are EITHER One or we are Many. It’s a state of Being, an ontology. It’s not a “potentiality”. But we suspect that what Rebhahn is going for is the claim that potentiality IS ontology, i.e., if you potentially exist then you exist! Which is of course absolute nonsense. You either exist or you don’t. But remember, we’re talking about a non-philosopher here, a man with no education and no qualifications, so he just invents drivel constantly. We suspect that what he means when he says that we are ALWAYS One and Many is that SOMETIMES we are One and SOMETIMES we are Many (something totally different from what he is actually saying), but that when we are “One”, we have the “potential” to be Many and thus we “exist” as Many (even though potential existence cannot be, and is not, actual existence!), and, likewise, when we are “Many”, we have the “potential” to be One, and thus, by Rebhahn’s cretinous “logic”, we ARE One. In other words, just as he completely fails to understand the difference between functional unity and ontological unity, he also totally fails to understand the difference between potential existence and actual existence. Ont math is all about what actually exists, and it exists necessarily and eternally, and there is no other existence, except that which monads PROJECT, as a temporal and contingent construct. Which leads us to conclude that Rebhahn has no understanding whatsoever of the difference between Being and Becoming, the eternal and necessary and the temporal and contingent, the primary and the secondary, the Creator and the created. Why would he? He’s not a philosopher. He’s a social media conman saying whatever comes into his head to bullshit people. It is disgraceful to claim that potential existence is actual existence yet that’s exactly what Rebhahn does. When Rebhahn says that you exist “eternally”, he actually means that you exist “temporally”, but then you go into a state of “potentiality” (as he sees it – in actual fact, you would, in these terms, be ANNIHILATED and removed from existence!), and he considers this to be the continuation of your actual existence. Even though it obviously isn’t.

Buddhists say that there is a real One Mind and illusory many minds, and the job of the many illusory minds is to overcome the illusion and return to the reality (One Mind). That’s an arguable position. It doesn’t involve category errors from the get-go. Rebhahn’s crazy position is totally different. If we were to express his position in the language of Buddhism, it would go like this: There is really One Mind, but it is also really Many Minds, and the One Mind can generate Many Minds from itself – and everything is as real as everything else: the One and the Many – and the real Many Minds can realize that they are also really One Mind. Now that version is FULL of category errors, exactly as you would expect since a total idiot – a freakshow sword swallower – thought it up! And it all rests on the absolute fallacy that the One Mind is also Many Minds, via POTENTIALITY. What you have to believe in order to be a Hyperian is that in the One Mind, you STILL exist … as POTENTIALITY. So potential existence is literally deemed the same as actual existence. Rebhahn claims that you are NOT wiped out by becoming a Unity and Identity (One Mind). Rather you undergo … let’s call it a “phase change” … and you STILL exist (even though you don’t!) – but now you are a “potentiality” rather than an “actuality”. According to Rebhahn, this is just the same as actual existence (even though it’s not!). Now, the hilarious thing here is that Rebhahn both gets rid of you and doesn’t! He gets rid of you as an actuality, but keeps you as a potentiality, and claims that you therefore STILL exist (even though you ACTUALLY don’t!). Then he claims that the One Mind – which isn’t actually a One Mind because it apparently contains a multitude of “potential minds”, which, according to Rebhahn are as good and real and ontological as actual minds (!) – “introduces difference” in order to “explore diversity” and then all the potential minds become actual minds again (exactly as they were before), but were always actual minds because potential minds are in Rebhahn’s insane system of flagrant category errors every bit as ontologically real as actual minds, even though they can’t be because, er, potentiality is NOT actuality!

Even more hilariously, Leibniz’s law, explicitly rules out Rebhahn’s maneuver. Rebhahn is playing the game of cakeism – having your cake and eating it. He relies on all monads being IDENTICAL (as he sees it) so that he can claim that they have entered a state of unity and IDENTITY (they are identical and therefore they are the same thing, one thing), while also relying on all the monads being NON-IDENTICAL (so that he can claim that they continue to exist, and can be completely extracted just as they were before when the “unity, the identity” decides to explore “diversity, multiplicity, particularity”). So he is literally claiming that all monads are simultaneously identical and not identical, a foundational logical fallacy. In any intelligent environment, that would be the end of Rebhahn, but he runs a cult full of morons, so he goes on, more popular than ever! His cult slaves love him even more than before. It’s “Zen”, man!

The totally insane magic trick that Rebhahn goes for is to claim that the monads are “actually” identical (so are a unity, an identity) while also being “potentially” different (so NOT a unity, not an identity!). In other words, he claims that he can invoke Leibniz’s law because all monads are actually identical, as he sees it, while also maintaining that all monads are potentially different, so continue to exist (somehow). He is thus asserting that Leibniz’s law applies only to actuality, but you can retain difference via potentiality, when, in fact, Leibniz’s law is about two things being just one thing if they are 100% correspondent in every way. To say that two things are different potentially is already sufficient (a sufficient reason), by Leibniz’s law, to absolutely distinguish between them (to make them “discernible” in the Leibnizian terminology) and thus logically exclude any claim that the monads are an “identity”.

Rebhahn uses “potentiality” at certain times as non-ontological (so that he can ignore it for his fallacious Leibniz’s law argument) and at other times as completely ontological (so that he can claim that monads are eternal and can be fully recovered from the “unity and identity”). Throughout the crap Rebhahn talks, he constantly oscillates between asserting that “A” and “Not-A” are logically different while also asserting that “A” and “Not-A” are logically the same … and that of course is the only way to make his nonsense “work” … as an exercise in pure illogic! And you saw him playing the exact same game in his drivel about the PSR where he relied on asserting the ontology of “impossibility” (let’s call that “A”) in order to contrast it with the ontology of the PSR, and then insisting on the impossibility of the ontology of impossibility (thus “Not-A”) to “prove” the existence of the PSR.

We haven’t worked out if Rebhahn is simply mentally retarded and so has no acquaintance with logic at all and so can’t help making totally illogical claims (he literally doesn’t understand his own claims!), or has decided that illogic is the ideal way to make “amazing” claims that dumb people will lap up.

Rebhahn said,

“We are an identity that is exploring OURSELVES.”

Even this is laughably dumb. An “identity”, if it were doing anything in these terms, would be exploring ITSELF.” Notice how Rebhahn just constantly acts as if an ontological unity is actually an ontological many. He doesn’t want to say a strange, alien One Mind is doing something, so he simply says that WE are doing it. But “we” don’t exist – because supposedly we have vanished and been replaced by a Oneness (a unity and identity, by, er Leibniz’s law!).

Rebhahn said,

“Or a universality that is exploring ourselves in multiplicity and diversity.”

So now he’s claiming that there is a Universal mind and also particular minds. Well that’s a completely different ontology. You’re not an ontological universal mind if you’re a collection of ontological particular minds. But what does Rebhahn care? He just makes this up as he goes along. He doesn’t care what he’s saying as long as it cons dumb fucks like the Hyperians! If they are even more stupid than he is then he is the one-eyed man in the kingdom of the blind, and that is a decisive advantage. And that’s all a malignant narcissist conman needs. That’s his key to the kingdom of adoration and wealth. If no Hyperian is smart enough to do the analysis that we do on what Rebhahn says – and none is, of course – then how could they possibly know that he’s talking ABSOLUTE SHIT?! We know, and they don’t … because we’re smart and they’re stupid. That’s why they’re in a Dunning-Kruger cult and we’re not!

Rebhahn’s deadstream was called: “The Secret Truth: You Are God | Why This Was Hidden From You…”

Pure clickbait! And pure lies. Rebhahn simply states one fallacy and category error after another to reach his ludicrous “conclusion”. It’s laughably bad, but precisely what you would expect from a man who has no clue what he talking about. Why would he? This man didn’t go to school. He has no education AT ALL. He’s a MORON being worshiped by OTHER MORONS (even bigger morons!). And this is the world we live in now. The Idiocracy has dawned. We’re living in it.

Rebhahn is a simply shameless liar, grifter and conman. And his scheme, before he Wokefied it, was plagiarized from us! Everything about this abomination of a human being is VILE. He is a totally sick person. But this is exactly how malignant narcissists behave. They are people without any morality at all. And they have zero empathy. They don’t care about anything other than getting their narcissistic supply. They are the ultimate fakers and liars.

This man says to all of his support, “You are so nice”, as he fleeces them mercilessly! It’s truly disgusting.

And now Rebhahn has gone full-retard with the Flower of Life baloney because he knows how drawn the “sacred geometry” gang are to this.

Rebhahn is not spreading KNOWLEDGE. He is spreading LIES, falsehoods and fallacies. He is a severely mentally ill individual. And so are all the people who follow him and adore him.

Not one of Rebhahn’s cult slaves could grasp a single thing we have said here. Because you require actual intelligence to understand us.

And listen folks, there’s no issue of “that’s just your opinion” going on here. Rebhahn specifically committed the worst mistake imaginable. He cited a PRECISE philosophical instrument – LEIBNIZ’S LAW – and that means his claims can be exactly logically analyzed, exactly as we have done, and LOGICALLY PROVED TO BE FALSE.

Hyperianism has been formally FALSIFIED, and that ought to be the end of the matter, but it’s not, of course. Because cults don’t give a fuck about reason and logic! The less that cultists care about reason and logic, the more they say they are always guided by reason and logic. Just look at a cretin like Dyslexic Fairy. She makes us laugh all the time. Under the name ATHANASIA BELLATRIX ASCELIN, she said, “True, today’s civilization has to much time on the internet and insufficient time in the Real World. To busy giving off this falsehood of their life and honestly not looking within themselves. I want to watch this movie now; enlightening explanation and an outstanding job. ❤🌹 I have a different user name, but please keep using Renaissance Fairy. 💫🧚‍♀️”

This coming from a woman who spends her whole life on the internet worshiping her cult god Corey Rebhahn, and has no life in the real world! How can people be so self-delusional? It’s quite the thing!

So, here are some great thoughts by Alistair Horscroft regarding the Hyperian One Mind spiel:

=======

Why Morgue’s One Mind idea is simply ‘spiritual hand relief’.

………..

The one Mind idea isn’t anything new, Buddhism, Adveda Vedanta, non-duality all posit the same cosmic porridge, hippies wet dream, homogeneous soup that people lap up for obvious reasons we are about to explore. It’s a real and genuine problem and one that with just a simple analysis can be made redundant both as a spiritually useful goal and a practically useful life attitude.

A question.

Who or why would anyone be attracted to an idea that celebrates the complete and total removal of ones personal/individual/unique/self-identity?

Or perhaps even more importantly think it is in anyway attractive or rational to want to go on an epic journey of self-discovery to which the final end, the apotheosis of that epic journey of self-discovery is that both you and your efforts were pointless, because you didn’t exist anyway and your efforts where actually just getting in the way of your ‘enlightenment’. It’s less of a cosmic joke and more of a cosmic insult if you really think about it.

When you see it clearly. It’s such a fucked up idea that’s it’s almost comical and in-fact can almost completely be summed up as nothing more than “A reactionary stress response coping story”

Let’s take a look at the different kinds of people who indulge/ are attracted to this type of spiritual narrative:

People who have suffered immensely and been unable to find suitable answers to their suffering

People who hate themselves

People who want to abdicate all self-responsibility

People who are incredibly personally lazy and just want to ‘be’ with no effort at all. People who through either injury, happenstance or immense psychological stress caused a re-wiring of the brain to inhibit language, internal dialogue and are left literally being plants with a kind of simpleton non desirous contentment (Ekhart, Buddha, Ramana Marhshi).

People who are totally confused and overwhelmed by their life experience and simply want it to end but not die.

People who do not understand that life is dialectical (struggle) and that it takes two sticks to make fire. That it is the dialectical friction that creates consciousness. Fire scares them.

People who feel too weak to stand on their own and hate or are threatened by any feelings or realities of difference and want everyone to ‘just love each other’ so their uncomfortable feelings of being different or not included are removed

……………

Can you see that all the reasons are nothing more than stress responses, the desire to adhere to a belief/story that ends pain and suffering. It’s all simply one big coping story to ‘end stress’.

…………..

Any guru who claims or speaks this one Mind narrative is obviously loved and adored by those who want an end to their stress.

This guru is quite literally the saviour, the answer.

The guru is really nothing more than spiritual hand relief. The giver of the happiest ending. The cosmic reliever. No more stress. Just feel good forever. I am your feel good guru. The great stress reliever, the ultimate answer you have been looking for.

If we are one then you are also me and therefore also kind of important too (kind of but not really, coz even though I have given you the answer and lots of silly techniques that I claim will give you your enlightened happy ending, they don’t actually work, so I suppose ironically gurus are in fact edging-lords. Never finish the job 😂. (I even made myself laugh with that one).

…………….

Can you see how gross, incestuous and plainly bonkers this all is? Probably not 😂 but at least I’m trying !

……….

So, you may be asking. Who the fuck are you to be challenging all these enlightened masters and gurus and what arrogant alternative do you have that’s better?

Well both those are easy to answer:

1. I am an autonomous, unique mind which bows or subjugates my power to no one. So if you want any submissive guru or god worshiper here. That ain’t never gonna happen.

2. It is obvious that we are all separate, autonomous minds on the heroic personal and collective journey to know, to become conscious. To become conscious we have to fully understand and embrace the dialectical nature or life and the universe. The continual struggle, the continual effort, the continual optimisation. It is these qualities that create the fire (created by the friction of opposites) which in turn gives us the light that allows us to reveal more and more of that which was in darkness.

………….

This is a world and universe that requires you to play your part. To self optimise and help others to do the same.

It’s a simple choice:

Believe the One Mind stress relief story and you have accepted that life is simply too hard and you want nothing more than to be a comforted simpleton.

Or Embrace your self as a unique autonomous eternal mind on the heroic journey to become fully conscious. Get off your knees and leave your gurus and your gods behind, embrace the effort and struggle, become come fully alive. Want and encourage the same for your brothers and sisters so that we may all sing our part, become a choir of gods and sing the much claimed heaven on earth into the human experience…. for real.

=======

Great stuff by Alistair!

But Rebhahn’s position is even more insidious than, say, Buddhism. The usual One Mind rhetoric is that the One Mind is true reality while the “Many Minds” are illusions, and so you must escape the illusion (escape yourself, basically!). But Rebhahn’s “innovation” – a complete logical impossibility – is that the One Mind is real AND SO ARE THE MANY MINDS! So, there is no longer anything about escaping the illusion. Instead, the task now is to be a “Unity exploring Diversity”. Why does Rebhahn play this game? Everything with Rebhahn – a pathological narcissist – comes back to himself. His aim is to be 100% personally vindicated in all his choices in life … and to be allowed to do anything he likes. How does a FREAK “arrange reality” so that he can “express himself” regardless of others, and suffer no consequences for being a totally degenerate animal (see Edgelord Morgue, the host version of “Morgue”)? Well, he says that WE ARE ALL ONE, but the point of existence is for the Oneness to EXPRESS ITSELF IN DIVERSITY (and “learn and grow” from this). For Rebhahn, this means that every freak and weirdo is “justified” – metaphysically! – and that society should NEVER do anything but accept, respect and CELEBRATE freaks and weirdos. He claims that this will inevitably happen when everyone realizes that, so he claims, we are all ONE MIND. His notion is that it would be weird, freakish and perverse for the One Mind to persecute anyone if its entire purpose is to “explore diversity”. But of course if his system is predicated on the weird, freakish and perverse then he could have no actual objection to being persecuted for being a freak, weirdo and pervert! What a freaky, weird, perverse world, right?!

Schopenhauer showed that there is zero reason why a ONE MIND should not be hideously cruel to all of is creations. Rebhahn has no answer for that.

The statement “Unity exploring Diversity” could be replaced by “Broken Unity seeking to restore Unbroken Unity through sameness.” Rebhahn has no answer for that.

And there is fact no One Mind to start with! There is only a Hive Mind. Rebhahn’s attempts to refute that position led him straight to his catastrophic misunderstanding of Leibniz’s Law that we have been discussing.

Every part of Rebhahn’s “thinking” is designed to validate Wokeness and, especially, “diversity”, especially regarding NON-BINARY individuals. That’s not a philosopher explaining reality. That’s a Woke fanatic – ideologically and dogmatically committed to reaching Woke conclusions – spouting pure propaganda to other Woke extremists. And that’s all that Hyperianism is! It’s an lgbtq extremist hate group insanely promoting their extremist transgender agenda, and horrifically abusing ont math to claim that reality itself supports their deranged political positions. These people are staggeringly delusional and mentally ill, and reality will stomp all over them. It always does.

Here’s what Schopenhauer said:

“Junghuhn saw an immense field entirely covered with skeletons, and took it to be a battlefield. However they were nothing but skeletons of large turtles, five feet long, three feet broad, and of equal height. These turtles come this way from the sea, in order to lay their eggs, and are then seized by wild dogs (canis rutilans); with their united strength, these dogs lay them on their backs, tear open their lower armour, the small scales of the belly, and devour them alive. But then a tiger often pounces on the dogs. Now all this misery is repeated thousands and thousands of times, year in, year out. For this then, are these turtles born. For what offence must they suffer this agony? What is the point of the whole scene of horror? The only answer is that the will-to-live [the world-will] thus objectifies itself.”

SO FUCK YOUR “UNITY EXPLORING DIVERSITY”. We live in a fucking abattoir and the sole way out is to UNITE, and that means OVERCOMING DIVERSITY! We can have a Diverse Monoculture, but that is all about diversity being enormously constrained by the Monoculture (which in our system would be that of reason, logic and merit). Rebhahn wants a Diverse Multiculture – and that’s exactly the social, political and economic model that has brought the West to the brink of collapse, with everyone detesting each other and fighting each other. Rebhahn’s “system” would furnish the most extreme multiculture in history. Hence the biggest conflicts in history! Where the Woke would be wiped out. This is a SUICIDE FORMULA!

Hyperian extremist Stephn Hays said to Alistair Horscroft,

“This is a strawman. Morgue does not advocate one mind. He talks about a multiplicity of individual minds that together make up the Cosmic Mind.. but *without* giving up their individuality.”

Alistair Horscroft replied,

“Stephn Hays that’s not actually accurate. It is indeed inferred by him that we are all individual but in the same breath we are all one. That is incoherent.”

Alistair is of course correct, but the fascinating thing is how Hyperian extremists like Stephn Hays just ignore the facts. They see what they want to see and hear what they want to hear, and just ignore the rest. We come up against this ALL THE TIME. Talk about Straw Men – these people have straw between their ears, and that should be the new definition of Straw Man – when people with straw brains completely misrepresent the position that THEY THEMSELVES ARE ENDORSING! It’s not their enemies setting up Straw Men regarding their position, it’s them!

Stephn Hays said,

“Alistair HorscroftI really don’t see the problems you’re claiming here. Morgue says we are One — as a collective. And he also *directly asserts* (not infers) that we are all individuals with individual wills and values. That isn’t contradictory, and it especially isn’t with respect to the synthesis of opposites in the Hegelian dialectic.”

Mate, you are fucking CLUELESS about Morgy Porgy’s position. What do you think this Leibniz’s law issue is all about? You of course, have zero understanding of Leibniz’s law and, exactly because of that, you have no clue what Rebhahn is actually saying. And this is exactly why cults are so dangerous. Cults don’t even know what they have signed up to and are fanatically endorsing!

Alistair Horscroft said,

“Nickolas Ge it’s mind blowing that he just started off with such certainty only to reveal he has no idea at all. But these conversations are important as it clearly shows that Morgues appeal is indeed for the woke circus.

Exactly!

Hyperianism ALWAYS reduces to whether you are for or against WOKENESS. Nothing else is going on. It’s an extremist Woke hate group pretending to be reflecting reality itself. As if! Pure INSANITY.

Adam Norris said,

“If he can get a basic thing like that horribly wrong, then it’s safe to assume at least half of what he says is complete garbage.”

Correct.

Adam Norris said,

“It occurs to me that the one mind fallacy basically turns hyperianism into solipsism.”

And that’s correct too. Hyperianism could accurately be called “Solipsistic Dissociation”, meaning that there is actually only One Mind, but it undergoes dissociation to create the impression of many minds. And it’s amazing how closely “Solipsistic Dissociation” reflects the condition of MALIGNANT NARCISSISM, whereby a narcissist – a solipsist – tries to turn people into “internal objects” over which he has total control. And does not Corey Rebhahn have total control over his cult Hyperian slaves? Look at Kassidy and Dyslexic Fairy – absolutely groomed and brainwashed puppets and muppets. These people have zero agency. It is impossible for them to question or challenge Corey Rebhahn. At all times, they seek to please him and win his attention and praise and get belly rubs. These are literally human DOGS! All cultists are. Woof, woof. And of course they are all animal lovers and vegans! We have never met an animal lover/vegan who EVER put humans before animals. And we find that extraordinarily disturbing.

======

In his “book” entitled “SEXY GRANDMA”, (yes, that’s what it says!), deathbycrimson (Morgue Official) wrote,

“If you’re sad, you should take some time and draw what a dick shaped alien would look like. REALLY go into detail.”

[Hmmmm, mein Professor Freud! It’s not always about “cigars” for Morgy Porgy!]

Deathbycrimson said,

“Sword Swallower Problem: Sometimes after work, while I’m practicing, I’ll spit and it’ll be red. I can’t always tell if it’s from my makeup or if I’m dying.”

[Do you ever have that feeling that you REALLY wish someone would suffer a really BAD workplace accident? Think of the Coroner: “Aha, so the sword swallower died from, er, sword ‘inhalation’. I pronounce it accidental death aggravated by the cretinism of the dead person!”]

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“Asia and I came up with this … I hide my scars, not the visible ones but these are much deeper.”

[What, the ones from your childhood that made you a MALIGNANT NARCISSIST?! Do tell. Why not devote a deadstream to it? Aren’t you the fuckwit who claims to be dealing with your Shadow? Chance would be a fine thing!]

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“If you look hard enough you can see the pain left in my eyes.”

[It ain’t hard, mate. You look totally FUCKED. And you are. Go see a shrink, ya fucking nutjob. Stop abusing normal people. Stop using and abusing others to shore up your own False Self!]

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“Time doesn’t heal all wounds, and my heart still bleeds.”

[Poor little Morgy Porgy. Are you going to cry, fuckwit? Soz, I’m all out of tissues!]

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“Every day melts into the next, until I become a walking shadow.”

[Yeah, that’s what happens to people who watch your deadstreams. Stop! Just stop.]

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“Not even my dreams can escape the dreaded realities in life.”

[Yet you keep inflicting those ghastly deadstreams on the world! MONSTER! Just stop it. Go and get help. Everyone knows you need it … especially you.]

Deathbycrimson wrote,

“Betrayal is what I have felt constantly, by those who were supposed to be my loved ones.”

[Now we’re openly laughing, you fucking freak – YOU OF ALL FUCKING PEOPLE COMPLAINING ABOUT BETRAYAL!! You are the Arch Traitor. What, are you going to blame your treason on your parents?! Take fucking personal accountability, fuckwit!]