BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON THE DANGEROUS CULT OF HYPERIANISM
• FROM THE CITIZEN JOURNALISTS OF THE AC •
Wikipedia says,
“In May 2017, Jordan Peterson began The Psychological Significance of the Biblical Stories, a series of live theatre lectures, also published as podcasts, in which he analyzes archetypal narratives in the Book of Genesis as patterns of behavior ostensibly vital for personal, social and cultural stability. A second series of lectures on the Book of Exodus released on DailyWire+ in November 2022, and another series on the Book of Proverbs has been announced.”
Peterson has been cheered on by conservatives for resurrecting the Bible. Peterson does not say that the Bible is literally true. He says it’s metaphor and allegory and Mythos and archetypes … delivering astonishing insights into the human condition and “God”, and how humans OUGHT to conduct themselves. To put it another way, he says the Bible is absolutely true psychologically, and in some ways that’s as good as saying that it is literally true. And therefore Christians have welcomed him with open arms.
Someone else is playing this game of saying that all ancient texts are metaphor and allegory and Mythos and archetypes … delivering astonishing insights into the human condition and “God”, and how humans OUGHT to conduct themselves … none other than MORGY PORGY. Except he uses a Woke rather than conservative framing for all of his reinterpretations of what the ancients wrote, and his game – his BIG LIE – is to “show” that all the texts he chooses are foreshadowing Hyperianism and are in a sense prophesying the coming of … Corey Rebhahn!!! And his cult slaves totally fall for it.
So, Morgy Porgy is, yawn, copying someone else (again) – Jordan Peterson this time. Everything is “metaphor”, “allegory”, “Mythos”, “archetype”, giving Rebhahn the perfect chance to superimpose his boring Woke reframing and reinterpretation on EVERYTHING.
“Aliens” – just an allegory … actually just Woke people of the past.
“Gnostics” – just Woke people of the past.
The Watchers and Nephilim? Just Woke people of the past.
DMT machine elves? – just Woke people from another dimension.
Alchemists – Woke people metaphorically describing spiritual transformation, and definitely not pre-chemists with huge labs, trying to physically turn base metal into gold and thus be fabulously wealthy.
Magicians? – just Woke people exercising their Will.
Demons? – er, just demonized Woke people.
Witches – Woke people burned by those vile neurotypical hetties.
Apparently the ancient and medieval worlds were full of Woke predecessors of Corey Rebhahn and his Hyperians … setting the scene – via metaphor and allegory for … Hyperianism. Hmmm, doesn’t that make Hyperianism just a metaphor and allegory too?
Who knew that Alchemists, for example, did not work in labs and did not use chemicals, and instead just sat around making up metaphors and allegories for exploring “higher consciousness”.
Who knew that magicians never cast any spells and didn’t believe in spells and were actually just Woke people using metaphor and allegories and archetypes to achieve a stronger will?
Who knew that the Watchers weren’t “angels” but were actually just enlightened Woke humans making up metaphors and allegories to describe higher consciousness?
We now see that the whole of history comprises people making up metaphors and allegories, and there is literally never any literal truth behind anything, and no person who ever wrote any ancient text ever literally believed what they were writing. Instead, writers of ancient texts invariably thought:
“Hmmm, what allegories and metaphors and archetypes can we weave into a Mythos so that thousands of years from now Corey Rebhahn can brilliantly reveal our metaphorical secrets to his spellbound super chatters and explain what we were really trying to say?”
So, all of these ancient writers of allegories, with their hidden meanings, must have been very scared of telling the truth directly. What were the Bible writers terrified of?
Isn’t it funny how Jordan Peterson says that the Bible was written by brilliant psychologists and that he has now cracked their code? Ta da. And Corey Rebhahn says that all the non-Bible writers were brilliant psychologists and he has now cracked their code. Ta da! Curiously enough, Rebhahn NEVER says that the Bible is a hidden code of psychological genius. Rebhahn never reveals the amazing allegorical and metaphorical power of the Book of Leviticus (stoning homosexuals, and all that). It seems that anyone who writes anything that Rebhahn doesn’t like is being literal, and everyone who says stuff he likes is speaking in allegory and metaphor and he will reveal what they actually meant, despite never having talked to any of them, and knowing absolutely nothing about the ancient world and its culture and psyche, and not caring in the slightest. Because as sure as hell Rebhahn will fit his Woke narrative over EVERYTHING he wants to (but not over the Bible … because he doesn’t want to).
So, the tale of the Watchers and Nephilim becomes the tale of ancient “Hyperians” spreading hidden and higher knowledge about higher consciousness and higher awareness to the masses, and being persecuted and tortured and annihilated (by FLOOD) by “God” and the powers that be, to stop them opening the eyes of the masses. Rebhahn literally said that he and the people who watch and approve of his videos ARE Watchers and Nephilim. Who knew? Didn’t you all get drowned, you fuckwits? Oh right, the Flood was just, you guessed it … metaphor and allegory.
Can you see how utterly shameless and cynical this game is and how perfect it is for grifting from suckers (just as Peterson – another malignant narcissist! – does with conservative suckers)?
Once you play the metaphor/allegory card, there’s nothing literal to explain anymore. You have turned everything into mere psychology and archetypes and you can just superimpose ANY STORY YOU LIKE over the material. A N**i, for example could interpret all the same material as Rebhahn and conclude that all of these so-called Woke people of yesteryear were actually predecessors of N**is! The Watchers were the SS of yesteryear – the master race of blue-eyed blondes, protecting the Aryan secrets, and were attacked by non-Aryan untermenschen. Rebhahn even went on about the Hyperboreans being “N**is” … remember that? And the literal emperor Hadrian (all hail!) was branded a N**i by the Hyperians because we wrote approvingly of him. WTF! That’s what you call REWRITING history. Rebhahn does it CONSTANTLY. (He’s actually a total ignoramus regarding history. The rest of the world are far superior to Americans regarding history because the rest of the world is HISTORICAL. You literally bump into it wherever you go. I could walk to a medieval castle in under five minutes from now!)
It’s such a pathetic game imposing American Wokeness on world history, and totally worthless in terms of the Truth. Only morons would ever take this game seriously. But Rebhahn earns $300,000 a year from it, so he will NEVER stop.
It’s just another version of Nietzsche’s famous statement:
“There are no facts, only interpretations.”
Soon even the interpretations will be gone and fully replaced by reinterpretations and misinterpretations. Just watch any Rebhahn deadstream. They get more and more surreal and unreal.
There are no facts, just metaphors and allegories told by people, and you can apply whatever Mythos, whatever interpretation you like to secure maximum narcissistic supply from your audience, and maximum super chats, natch.
Sanja Jan said, “I didn’t get it… what Morgue wanted to say… that ghost writers/ PI are the Watchers over humanity?? Most likely. (it’s not what he said literally …but my interpretation) But whatever…he makes it all about him…and people should see it. Hyperians now probably believe he’s one of the Watchers… (he fell from heaven to experience sex) johoo Then he said that we are The watchers. We all have a higher knowledge then lol. I didn’t understand what the point of this deadstream was. Why mention The watchers in Book of Enoch if we are all The watchers anyway? Let’s all have sex with Morgue coz he’s the Watcher lol. Let’s praise him…
It’s what i understood or misunderstood from his stream lol
For me the PI are the Watchers metaforically.
Did anyone see what i saw ?
Heard what i heard? Lol.”
Ah, interesting! For sure, Porgy is claiming to be a Watcher, and it’s for sure all about him … and yes he fell from heaven to
“experience diversity”
which seems to entail a lot of non-binary sex … involving the butt! The Nephilim especially love that … according to the ancient allegorical texts!
Back to Rebhahn’s One Mind grift. Rebhahn refers – AGAIN – to the flower of life and says that if all the circles had the same location they would appear to be just one circle. Well, appearances can of course be deceiving. And appearance is not ontology, is not reality. Phenomena do not reveal noumena … they conceal noumena! They HIDE the truth.
Rebhahn said, AGAIN,
“By Leibniz’s law, the law of identity, the identity of indiscernibles, we know that when a multiplicity of things are identical, FUNCTIONALLY they are the same thing.”
Sheez, how often have we been through this? Leibniz’s law has NOTHING TO DO WITH FUNCTIONAL IDENTITY; it’s very strictly about ONTOLOGICAL IDENTITY. If two things are identical in every way, they are of course NOT two things … they are the same thing. If anything at all about the two things differs then they are ONTOLOGICALLY different things. As Leibniz himself said … go look up Leibniz’s Monadology online right now! … it’s item 9) – 9. “Each monad, indeed, must be different from every other monad. For there are never in nature two beings which are exactly alike, and in which it is not possible to find a difference either internal or based on an intrinsic property.”
So, there you have Leibniz, the first man to give calculus to the world, and the man who gave us, obviously, “Leibniz’s law”, stating unequivocally that no two monads are ever the same. There is no such thing as different monads ever being identical, as Rebhahn so absurdly claims. For two different things to be functionally in the same state has nothing at all to do with those different things being “IDENTICAL” i.e., the same in every regard. But Rebhahn doesn’t understand this simplest of points. Yet this man with no education and no qualifications who worked in a beauty parlor and hair salon thinks Leibniz is a dummy and that he – a non-binary sword swallower on a freakshow – knows better. And all the other morons who follow him and worship him AGREE. Well, they would, wouldn’t they? These people are literally incapable of reading Leibniz’s published Monadology and understanding a word of it and nor would they ever actually read it. They would much rather send Rebhahn love, adoration, worship and loads of money on his deadstreams.
This conman is going to keep repeating this gibberish FOREVER (and never once responding to our logical demotion of his nonsense … via Leibniz’s own arguments!). Why? Because he can. Because not a single one of his cult slaves will EVER dare to say he’s talking shit, even though everyone knows he is, including himself. But none of these people gives a FUCK about the Truth. They believe in Wokeness and “social justice” (just listen to a halfwit like “Exploring the Holos”, a man who never once allowed intelligence to cloud his non-thoughts) and the truth can go fuck itself if it ain’t Woke and ain’t on the side of exotic minorities and extremist individuals, and the animals. Don’t think of the children, think instead of the animals!
So, to repeat to all you Hyperian dummies once again, Leibniz’s law has nothing to do with different things being in the same state. It’s to do with apparently different things actually being the same thing because 100% of their properties are ontologically IDENTICAL and thus they CANNOT be different things – they are the same ontological thing, and they have been wrongly treated as different things. They are One, not MANY, and this is true FOREVER. “They” cannot be ontologically One and then suddenly become ontologically different any more than you could split in two right now. There is NO PROCESS of any kind that could replicate you ontologically. Two identical twins are functionally identical in some technical sense, but they are actually two entirely different beings, with different monadic minds controlling them.
Rebhahn said,
“So what does this mean? It means that reality as a living system has the capacity for UNITY and MULTIPLICITY.”
Except it doesn’t. There is an eternal and necessary Hive Mind and all of us, as eternal ontological individual monadic minds, will absolutely NEVER be part of any ontological unity with other minds. That is strictly impossible … BY LEIBNIZ’S LAW! We can certainly enter into functional unity at zero entropy but that is not ontological unity and we are never ONE MIND (a strict impossibility). Yet Rebhahn keeps repeating this lie and total fallacy because he knows it’s what his WOKE audience want to hear – because it seems to metaphysically justify Wokeness. Except even that is false. Schopenhauer believed in One ontological mind becoming many phenomenal minds (not ontologically separate minds), but his system was an unwoke as it gets and was about how mind in a sense can do nothing other than ATTACK itself – because of its internal savage will – and only by non-willing (if such a thing were possible … it’s not) could you escape from the horror. So even the entire One and Many spiel doesn’t lead to Wokeness. It could, as Schopenhauer showed, lead to the opposite!
Rebhahn said,
“But the multiplicity NEVER vanishes.” Oh, now we have an ontological claim about minds being individual minds forever, except of course that’s a category error in relation to Rebhahn’s claim that we are “all One Mind”, i.e., all differences between us HAVE vanished and we are an “identity”. (Not just a unity you understand, but an actual IDENTITY, as in 1 ≡ 1).
Rebhahn said,
“The multiplicity just enters into a state in which it is FUNCTIONALLY ONE.”
But that’s what our HIVE MIND system is! And it has absolutely nothing to do with an ontological One Mind.
Our system is about different things being capable of entering into functional, not ontological, unity. Rebhahn’s system – and note how he now avoids like the plague using the term ONTOLOGICAL UNITY – is about seemingly different ontological things actually being one thing … an “identity” (which means of course that multiplicity is an illusion, contrary to Rebhahn’s whole spiel!).
Schopenhauer believed in a phenomenal multiplicity that was in fact an ontological unity, i.e., there is only One Mind ontologically but it can phenomenally appear to be many. It cannot under any circumstances produce ontological multiplicity! Yet Rebhahn’s exact claim when he talks about people being both One and Many is that you permanently inhabit two different ontological states: one where “you” are actually ONE MIND (of course, logically, we cannot actually refer to “you” because you do not exist in this scenario!)
Rebhahn said,
“So you notice you have this multiplicity … even if all these circles were to have the same location it would be as though there was one circle and functionally it would as though there was one circle.”
Total nonsense, as ever. There are ALWAYS many circles, but they have been placed in the same functional state. They are always MANY DIFFERENT CIRCLES in the functional same state. They are NEVER one FUNCTIONAL CIRCLE (which would be a single ONTOLOGICAL circle).
Rebhahn said,
“But really it has the capacity to have diversity. If you give them all unique locations again, diversity is introduced.”
Rebhahn CANNOT BACK DOWN OVER THIS … so just keeps repeating his lies and fallacious nonsense, and his cult slaves cannot back down over this either because the moment they ACKNOWLEDGE that Rebhahn is telling lies and spreading fallacies, they would have to leave the cult there and then. And they won’t do that. So they will have absolute faith in this conman’s lies and fallacies because that’s what these people do. They detest the Truth. What matters to these clowns is Wokeness. For them, Wokeness beats the Truth hands down, and they will accept any Woke lie over the unwoke truth every single time. And that’s why the Hyperian cult exists. It’s a cult that campaigns against the truth and spreads total lies abut the nature of reality. Don’t take our word for it – just go read Leibniz directly. Do your fucking research! Stop believing what an uneducated conman tells you to believe. Stop accepting this man’s authority … he has none. He is up against Leibniz. He is up against the Truth. There is only one winner.
Rebhahn said,
“The reason I am talking about this is that this is how reality operates.”
It isn’t!
Rebhahn said,
“… in terms of a living mind … I want you to imagine that each of these circles represents a living mind, a living subjectivity, a living self. OK, so when there is no difference, it’s as though there is one.”
Note the phrase “as though there is One.” Mate, there is either an ontological unity or there isn’t. You can’t use “as though” regarding ontology, you fuckwit. Just how fucking dumb are you? You are INSANE to imagine you have any intelligence at all. You are the ENEMY of the intelligent. Just like the Sophists, you are faking it, faking being intelligent (faking being a Philosopher). You will say ANYTHING for a buck. You would NEVER admit the truth. Any philosopher would admit a 100% error. You wouldn’t under any circumstances. You don’t. You go on repeating lies, and you have lucratively monetized your lies, and you ruthlessly exploit cretins like Dyslexic Fairy, a zombie who quotes her way through life because who the fuck would listen to that stupid saddo’s own thoughts? She doesn’t have any anyway. That’s why she quotes incessantly and is the No.1 donor to a sick cult. Here’s a quote for you, you Dyslexic nutjob – KNOW THYSELF. I mean, as if.
It’s hilarious to us that Rebhahn – a malignant narcissist with a False Self – says “Know Thyself”. That’s what you will never know, you dumb clown. Your sole reality is getting others to adore you. What will you do the day they stop? You will die. Because there is no you. You are a fiction. You are a metaphor, an allegory, a Mythos (see what we did there? – no flies on us! … wink emoticon). You are a narcissistic STEREOTYPE.
So, Rebhahn, are you referring to an ontological DISUNITY that SEEMS to be One (this is a functional unity), or is it an ontological One Mind (an ontological unity)? These are two totally different things. Leibniz’s law applies to the second scenario but not to the first, so we know you are going for the second option because you explicitly cite Leibniz’s law … yet you are using the language that goes with the first option. And that’s because you are an appalling conman who is trying to say two totally different things and thereby bamboozle and con the idiot suckers who follow you.
This is a very precise logical situation – because it revolves around a precise technical philosophical instrument (Leibniz’s law), and yet you are DELIBERATELY mixing the two logically different situation because you KNOW that your followers are too stupid to know the difference and will be impressed by the gibberish you are saying, and send you adoration and money. This is exactly what malignant narcissists do – they lie and they con! And they have no guilt or shame about that, and zero conscience about what they are doing. Because the only thing they care about is narcissistic supply, and the money that goes with it, and they don’t care what lies they have to tell to get it. There are literally ZERO circumstances in which Rebhahn will admit that he 100% fucked up Leibniz’s law. He literally had NO CLUE what it meant yet used it because his catastrophic MISUNDERSTANDING of it was exactly what he needed to claim that reality is inherently WOKE and
“EXPLORING DIVERSITY”.
Sanja Jan said,
“Also based on Morgue’s writings as Crimson… you can see he sometimes talks like One mind (Unity) …then other times as individual. I think he decides when something feels right or not …maybe he even has a plan for all week …on Monday he talks like we are all one, on Wednesday he will talk like individual mind …
Lol why not changing these two views constantly like in few seconds? ”
” And that’s very true.
Rebhahn switches between “I” and “We” constantly. As a malignant narcissist, he cares only about “I” and is purely solipsistic, and regards others as his “internal objects” (so actually believes that there is only ONE MIND – his! – and everyone else is just an aspect of him), and then he remembers that other people might actually exist (!), and he needs their adoration and money, so he then switches to “We”. Once you realize the code, it becomes hilarious. In fact, everything Rebhahn does is pure satire of himself. The “Exposing Hyperianism” channel captured him perfectly in the video “MorgueOfficial: The Art of The Grift (SUPERCUT) | Hyperianism Exposed”. Great job again by Wrath.
Rebhahn said,
“So at this point it’s AS THOUGH there is One Mind”.
But there ISN’T One Mind. There is ontologically a HIVE MIND, not One Mind. All the monads are perfectly aligned, hence are in the same functional state, while of course being completely ontologically separate via their haecceity and aseity and ont math core definition.
Rebhahn said,
“This One Mind then decides to explore in diversity and multiplicity through its transformations by introducing DIFFERENCE.”
Have you noticed that Rebhahn is no longer talking about a functional “One Mind” – it’s now an ontological One Mind with its own subjectivity and agency. It, the ONE MIND, decides to explore. It’s not YOUR mind deciding this. YOU DO NOT EXIST. Your subjectivity and agency have been ELIMINATED. It’s a completely different mind, the ONE Mind, that is “deciding”. So where are you? You are nowhere. You have been eliminated from existence, hence aren’t an “eternal mind” as Rebhahn fallaciously claims.
And even this One and Many Woke rhetoric doesn’t work anyway. As we said, Schopenhauer’s One Noumenal Mind explores phenomenal multiplicity via the individuation (“difference”; “diversity”) supplied by space and time. And there are zero Woke features of Schopenhauer’s version of the One and the Many. It’s a BLOODBATH. Life will eat itself! Think about it. Reality is LITERALLY based on living creatures EATING each other (it’s not as if anyone eats sand or air!). Is that fucking Woke?
Rebhahn said,
“When ‘difference’ is introduced…”
From where? What is this difference? What is it ONTOLOGICALLY? In the Hive Mind of ont math, difference is built into the system via the eternally different monads, but these different monads can explore functional unity (via zero entropy) and also disunity (via entropy), and this is achieved through ontological Fourier mathematics, creating an entropic spacetime domain of matter as a secondary mathematical projection of the perfect mind (the Absolute, “GOD”, the divine HIVE MIND, the collection of all monads, of all of US! … we’re all as good and perfect as each other, and what could be better than that? … big hugs and kisses, everyone … we are the divine ROUND TABLE!).
Rebhahn said,
“When difference is introduced now you have a multiplicity.”
But you ALWAYS had a multiplicity. It’s inherent in the concept of “Hive Mind”. What definitely doesn’t exist is any ontological “One Mind” deciding to “explore diversity”. Rebhahn said in relation to the flower of life (sacred geometry!),
“So imagine these circles with the ability to collapse into a unity and then expand into a multiplicity.”
But they are NOT doing that! The spread-out circles become a STACK of circles. They don’t become a ONE CIRCLE. They don’t collapse into anything. This is just HILARIOUS. This is what happens when a dumb fuck gets carried away with a dumb picture he formed in his mind in order to advance his Woke ideology and decided that this is how reality operates. How absurd.
You know what’s really behind this? Rebhahn knows that sacred geometry New Agers and Wokesters swear by the flower of life, so he wanted to metaphysically validate it … to get narcissistic supply from all these morons. To get these people to worship him (these “intuitive”, “emotional”, “artistic”, Woke New Age women and gay men … and they did!) This is precisely how these malignant narcissists operate. They tell you simplistic crap that they know you want to hear because they know you will adore them for it. And they always do. 1 + 1 = 2.
Remember, if you lay out lots of circles in a flower of life pattern and then put all the circles on top of each other, you retain the exact number of circles you started with! Duh! Call it the law of conservation of circles, if you will. Rebhahn – a comedian if ever there was one – says that a million circles, say, “collapse” to one circle, and then “expand” back to a million circles. And he keeps a straight face. WTF? Where did nine hundred and ninety-nine thousand and nine hundred and ninety-nine circles go to in order to leave only ONE circle?! Don’t ask us … ask the comedian! And then how do they all reappear out of the one circle? Is this “magic”? Yet Rebhahn actually claims that this is the fundamental nature of existence. Moreover, he (sometimes) claims that the One Mind and the Many Minds ALWAYS exist together (we are ALWAYS One and Many) and at other times he claims that we are in One Mind in the “collapsed” state of the circles, and then, later, we are Many Minds in the “expanded” state of the circles, meaning that we are successively One and Many, not simultaneously One and Many. Well, which is it, dumbass? These are two wholly different ontological situations.
Rebhahn said,
“This is how we are One Mind exploring itself in its diversity.”
This is Wokeness boiled down to a sentence, and it is 100% FALSE! We are in fact the opposite: we are many minds exploring UNITY!!! The objective of the universe of Becoming is to attain ZERO ENTROPY – perfect functional unity. So, reality’s telos is the OPPOSITE of what Rebhahn claims (yet he says he supports a “teleocracy” – oh how we laugh and mock!). He says that reality is somehow about exploring “diversity”, yet even in his own ludicrous system, this diversity has to come back to unity, so why doesn’t he say, in Hegelian language (we all know how much he lies about Hegel being his fave philosopher!):
“Unity ALIENATES itself in diversity and then returns to itself as a Higher Unity, having achieved a whole new dimension of self-awareness through Becoming”.
In other words, Hegel would say that the precise objective is to overcome the ALIENATION, the ABNORMALITY, of diversity and understand its functional Oneness (“The truth is the whole”). But the last thing Rebhahn would ever do is describe difference and multiplicity and “diversity” as a state of extreme alienation that must be annihilated!
Rebhahn is a total anti-Hegel! He preaches the opposite of Hegel. Rebhahn says that alienation is a desirable state rather than one that must be overcome if we want to reach the truth!
Sanja Jan said,
“How does Morgue decide when to act from One mind theory and when to act as individual mind?? Does he decides based on feeling? Whatever feels right in the moment. Lol And maybe he has a plan…on Monday he talks and acts like were all one, on Wednesday he talks and acts like were all individuals…lol
This is an astute point. Imagine that we were actually One and Many minds simultaneously, as Rebhahn claims. How could we actually function? Should we be taking decisions as ONE, or as individuals within the MANY? How do we choose? How do we switch from one mode to the other? Funnily enough, not once have I ever experienced being a One Mind. But, hey, I’m not Hyperian. Maybe I’m excluded from the One Mind. But, er, that would mean that there are at least TWO MINDS … the “One Mind” and my mind, which is outside the One Mind. Sheez!
By the way, if we were miraculously One Mind and Many Minds, as Rebhahn claims, then mind-reading (telepathy) would be built into this system – since how could we NOT read the minds of others if we are actually One Mind? By definition, their mind is ours (insofar as we can refer to “theirs” and “ours”). But didn’t Rebhahn say that mind-reading is strictly impossible? Sheez!
More on Rebhahn’s NEVER-ENDING SHITSTORY tomorrow. Hey, folks, maybe reality operates differently in FANTASIA, and a million circles placed on top of each other really do vanish into one circle. But why not collapse all the way into a singularity, or even non-existence? Don’t ask Rebhahn. That guy is dangerously dumb!
Let’s briefly hear more fuckwittery from deathbycrimson.
Deathbycrimson:
Sometimes the truth hurts. But I don’t go off telling lies. I’m sorry but I don’t hold back. if I call you out on something, don’t think I’m doing it to be an ___ because I’m not.. I’m done with people’s bull ____ lies about me and I’m tired of the hypocrisy in the messages we get… If this continues, I’m done with Wattpad…. I’ll be done with all social Media… Don’t believe me? Go ahead, try me…I dare you…”
[Dared! FUCK OFF FROM SOCIAL MEDIA!!! Go on, do it, fuckwit. See how you get on it without it … ho, ho, ho.]
Deathbycrimson:
“I might as well… I mean, I’m barely ever on… Nothing is going as planned anymore. It’s all falling apart.”
[Fuckwit!]
Deathbycrimson:
“I hate seeing Morgue in a hospital bed with tears in his eyes because he’s in so much pain. This is heartbreaking”
[Er, we’re loving it! … Just sayin’!]
deathbycrimson
“WHO CARES WHAT MORGUE AND I DO AT NIGHT!? THAT IS OUR BUSINESS AND IF WE WANTED TO SHARE IT, WE WOULD. NOW STOP! ITS GETTING OLD! WE’D ONLY TELL ONE PERSON BECAUSE MORGUE HAD A PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH HER”
[With a woman?! Sheez. Have pigs started flying now? Who knew?]
deathbycrimson
“Today is the kind of day to waste it on music… ♪♪♪ I need a life *sighs*” ~morgue
[Mate, you gave up your life in childhood. You adopted a Fake Self and you’ve never been alive since then. You’re a human impersonator, not an actual human.]
Deathbycrimson:
“Marilyn Manson is God ♥”
[What, he took your job?]
Deathbycrimson
“I couldn’t ask for anybody else ♥ The fact we don’t stay mad at one another for longer than 4 hours makes me happy… I could talk about Asia for years *smiles*”
[Ahem, where is Asia now? Is she another of the ever-growing band of “DISAPPEARED”? … do you imagine Rebhahn EVER thinks about RJ, Apollonius, CL, Megan, Jewel, Wrath, and all the others, or does he do a full Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind on them? That must be one of Rebhahn’s fave movies … wasn’t it about him and his boyfriend Andre, er, girlfriend?!]
Deathbycrimson
“Aquarians are the zodiac’s most mysterious and unusual people – and no two are anything alike. Those born under this sign – ruled by innovative and non-conformist Uranus – march to the beat of their own drum. They see life in a different way. Others quite frequently think their habits and ideas are eccentric or crazy in some way, but it is this uniqueness that makes them so special. The Aquarian mind is extremely quick and they never seem to stop thinking (it is interesting to note that many born under this sign suffer from insomnia.) Aquarians usually have strong political, environmental or social beliefs. But whether it is a relationship, career or cause – Aquarians are happiest when they have “something” to believe in and nurture”
[Morgy Porgy, were you born under UR ANUS? Maybe in retrograde]
Deathbycrimson
*sighs* Morgue, I want to have a child…~Asia [WTF!]
Deathbycrimson
“Today is my sister’s wedding. I’m a bride’s maid and Morgue is the Best Man… I wonder if he’ll wear a tux. . . ~Asia~”
[Best Man? A tux? Now we’ve heard it all. Reality has finally vanished up … UR ANUS.]
Tags: Corey Rebhahn, Morgue Official, Morgen Night, Hyperianism, Morgue from Freakshow, Hyperian, Hyperianism Quotes, AMC Freakshow, Inner Star Actualization, Cult of Hyperianism, Hyperian Founder, Morgue Official Real Name, What is Hyperianism, Hyperianism Beliefs, Morgue Official Wikipedia