BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON THE DANGEROUS CULT OF HYPERIANISM
• FROM THE CITIZEN JOURNALISTS OF THE AC •
Here’s what Morgue Official said on his latest video. In fact, he says it on all his videos:
“This is what MY channel and MY work are all about. … MY channel is about spreading this information to create a new humanity and a new earth. So hit like and subscribe now to help the algorithm spread it. If you feel like you ever learned something from my videos, support on Patreon and you’ll get access to secret videos and more. You can also help by hitting the join button on YouTube below.”
Note that it’s HIS channel and HIS work. It’s not Hyperianism’s channel and it’s not Hyperianism’s work. In fact, there is no such thing as Hyperianism. “Hyperianism” is simply what Morgue Official says it is, so it’s not anything different from the personal opinions, beliefs and tastes of Morgue Official himself. “Hyperians” are merely those who mindlessly support Morgue Official’s opinions, beliefs and tastes. They fund Morgue Official and they are the source of enormous narcissistic supply for him, but no Hyperian gets to express any take of their own on what Hyperianism is. We invited Hyperians to write essays on what they believed Hyperianism to be, and of course Morgue Official banned his cult slaves from participating, and they immediately did as ordered, these remarkable “freethinkers” who like to show how “autonomous” they are. But what would they say anyway? All they could possibly do is regurgitate the opinions, beliefs and tastes of Morgue Official. Because there isn’t anything else.
In THTTM, online Illuminists were free to say whatever they liked regarding Hyperianism and Illuminism, and many contributors gave their own take on Illuminism, and added their own personal experiences and wisdom, and that’s exactly how it should be. When we come across any brilliant ideas, we want Illuminism to embrace them. Why wouldn’t we? But no one gets to contribute anything at all to “Hyperianism”. Not the mods, not the “creators”, not the donors, not the supporters, not anyone else. You are simply required to agree unconditionally with whatever Morgue Official says. He has been writing the Hyperian Bible for years now. No one in the Hyperian “movement” is allowed to contribute ANYTHING to that book! Now look at our books. We have quoted countless people in the online Illuminist community, and huge chunks of some of our books are given over to highlighting the views of very talented online Illuminists.
And these views are therefore now part of Illuminism. They’re either explicitly endorsed by us, or regarded as highly meritorious and worthy of the utmost consideration. The key point is that anyone in this Illuminist community can be heard and can make a difference, whereas no one at all in Hyperianism is ever allowed to interfere with Corey Rebhahn’s Hyperianism (well, except his mom, Breeder Bitchell, but she would never disagree with him no matter what! …. She is an archetypal animus-possessed inverted narcissist).
If you’re good enough, you can make a material difference to Illuminism. Your views can be promoted by Illuminism. That can NEVER happen in Hyperianism.
Illuminism is a movement and a movement is about its members. Hyperianism is a cult and a cult is about the cult leader – the dictator, the fuehrer, the Savior, the Messiah, the Ascended Master, the Guru, the source of revelation … the God.
There is not, and cannot be a Hyperian movement. Hyperianism is a one-man band. It’s a Vanity Project. It’s the purest expression of MALIGNANT NARCISSISM you can get. It’s a platform for a grandiose narcissist, and that’s all it can ever be because that’s all it’s about.
A movement can and does change its leader. A cult does not and cannot. Can Hyperianism change Corey Rebhahn? Of course not. The cult would instantly end if Rebhahn vanished or went to jail or the madhouse where he belongs.
There is no philosophy, no movement … just the slavish ADORATION of a cult leader. Rebhahn’s cult slaves hang around purely because of him. Imagine Immensely Fat Jan, Necrophil, Breeder Bitchell or the Confederate Wonderpoop taking over Rebhahn’s deadstream duties. The cult would terminate there and then. Because this cult is a fanclub for Rebhahn and could never be anything else. We were absolutely appalled when we realized we were lending our credibility to a full-on narcissist and psychopath. And now we must undo the effects of that.
Hyperianism is about showing unconditional support, adoration and love for Morgue Official and accepting without demur WHATEVER he says. No Hyperian EVER questions Morgue Official. No one EVER challenges him. Hyperians will troll us all day long every day, but none of these trolls would EVER pose an uncomfortable question for Rebhahn. There is no mechanism for replacing him, or for replacing any mod. All mods are directly appointed by Morgue Official and the only qualification is how far up Rebhahn’s arse they can get, and how abjectly submissive they are towards him. No mechanisms are ever proposed to allow Hyperians to CHOOSE who the mods should be, and, above all, who the leader should be. Because these Hyperians aren’t in any movement. They are cult slaves of Corey Rebhahn, and Hyperianism is just Morgue Official’s fan club. Frankly, it always was. Hyperianism, we now see, was never anything other than a vehicle of self-promotion for one of the most outrageous, degenerate narcissists on this planet – the cretinous plagiarist COREY REBHAHN (Morgue Official, aka “DAVID”). Rebhahn is practically the twin of Andrew Tate, and those two could easily be lovers. Tate is already behind bars and Rebhahn will also end up there.
In his least deadstream, Rebhahn invoked Empedocles to try to shore up his nonsense. Rebhahn said,
“You might know Empedocles better as the man who came up with the four elements theory: Earth, wind, fire, and water.”
It’s Earth, AIR, fire and water, you fucking ignoramus, and it was Empedocles who did the first scientific experiment to demonstrate the existence of AIR.
Wikipedia says,
“Air was one of many archai proposed by the Pre-Socratics, most of whom tried to reduce all things to a single substance. However, Empedocles of Acragas (c. 495-c. 435 BCE) selected four archai for his four roots: air, fire, water, and earth. … Prior to Empedocles, Greek philosophers had debated which substance was the arche (‘first principle’), or primordial element from which everything else was made; Heraclitus championed fire, Thales supported water, and Anaximenes favored air. Anaximander argued that the primordial substance was not any of the known substances, but could be transformed into them, and they into each other. Empedocles was the first to propose the four classical elements as a set: fire, earth, air, and water. He called them the four ‘roots’ (rhizōmata).”
So, Empedocles moved away from the single arche notion and created the historically highly influential four elements theory which lasted right up to alchemical times and was only replaced by the rise of modern chemistry.
Rebhahn said,
“But he also said that reality goes through cycles of unity and separation, unity and separation, unity and separation OR love and hate, love and hate, love and hate.”
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is the basis of all of Rebhahn’s nonsense about “unity”, “difference”, and “diversity” (and watch all those weird, camp, cringey hand gestures Rebhahn makes where he tries to make this crap seem convincing!)
Rebhahn said that Empedocles identified this. Except he didn’t. It’s ridiculous how much Rebhahn misrepresents EVERY philosopher he cites to try to endorse his mad drivel.
Here’s what Bertrand Russell said about Empedocles’ cosmology:
I come now to his cosmology. It was he, as already mentioned, who established earth, air, fire, and water as the four elements … Each of these was everlasting, but they could be mixed in different proportions, and thus produce the changing complex substances that we find in the world. They were combined by Love and separated by Strife. Love and Strife were, for Empedocles, primitive substances on a level with earth, air, fire, and water. There were periods when Love was in the ascendant, and others when Strife was the stronger. There had been a golden age when Love was completely victorious. In that age, men worshipped only the Cyprian Aphrodite. The changes in the world are not governed by any purpose, but only by Chance and Necessity. There is a cycle: when the elements have been thoroughly mixed by Love, Strife gradually sorts them out again; when Strife has separated them, Love gradually reunites them. Thus every compound substance is temporary; only the elements, together with Love and Strife, are everlasting. There is a similarity to Heraclitus, but a softening, since it is not Strife alone, but Strife and Love together, that produce change. Plato couples Heraclitus and Empedocles in the Sophist: ‘There are Ionian, and in more recent time Sicilian, muses, who have arrived at the conclusion that to unite the two principles (of the One and the Many), is safer, and to say that being is one and many, and that these are held together by enmity and friendship, ever parting, ever meeting, as the severer Muses assert, while the gentler ones do not insist on the perpetual strife and peace, but admit a relaxation and alternation of them; peace and unity sometimes prevailing under the sway of Aphrodite, and then again plurality and war, by reason of a principle of strife.’
“Empedocles held that the material world is a sphere; that in the Golden Age Strife was outside and Love inside; then, gradually, Strife entered and Love was expelled, until, at the worst, Strife will be wholly within and Love wholly without the sphere. Then – though for what reason is not clear – an opposite movement begins, until the Golden Age returns, but not for ever. The whole cycle is then repeated. One might have supposed that either extreme could be stable, but that is not the view of Empedocles. He wished to explain motion while taking account of the arguments of Parmenides, and he had no wish to arrive, at any stage, at an unchanging universe. The views of Empedocles on religion are, in the main, Pythagorean.”
What does Rebhahn do with all this? Well, why not try to work it out for yourself? If you want the answer, straight away, here goes. Rebhahn uses Empedocles to talk about reality going through “cycles of unity and separation, unity and separation, unity and separation”… Except Rebhahn does it in a way that actually fundamentally subverts the Empedoclean worldview.
Rebhahn replaces the Empedoclean “Love Sphere” with the “unity, identity and perfection” of monads by “Leibniz’s law” to form “a single universal One Mind”. He then claims that “the sphere” introduces “difference”, with “difference” actually taking the role of “strife” in the Empedoclean universe. But Rebhahn deliberately doesn’t use the word “strife” because he wants to say that “difference” is a GREAT THING, not the CAUSE OF CONFLICT AND DISUNITY (as it actually is!). So, he says, that the “One Mind” – the Unity – wants to explore “difference” and he says that this is because of “boredom” or loneliness”, or whatever other shit he can invent.
In the Empedoclean system, nothing would EVER want to leave the “Love Sphere” and this sphere is disrupted purely because of the unwelcome encroachment of STRIFE from outside, which Rebhahn has instead depicted as the WELCOME introduction of “Difference”. That is, he has Wokefied the Empedoclean worldview to make sure it fully approves of Woke diversity. Once again, he has absolutely sabotaged what a great philosopher and Illuminist actually said!
For Empedocles, strife (entropy) disrupts the effects of love (negentropy). Rebhahn, a staggeringly disingenuous conman, places MASSIVE, DECISIVE EMPHASIS on the Oneness “introducing difference” in order for “the One” to create “the Many” and bring about “Unity exploring diversity” – which is the conclusion Rebhahn desperately wants to arrive at, and indeed set out to arrive at, and he is abusing Empedocles’s work. Empedocles had a completely different worldview. Empedocles would say that a perfect, blissful state of LOVE was sabotaged by STRIFE and then everything split apart. Only when LOVE is in the ascendant can everything get back together again.
You have to ask yourself an astonishing question – where is LOVE in Rebhahn’s system, i.e., where is the UNIFYING FACTOR? It has fucking totally vanished!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why? Because if Rebhahn has replaced “strife” with “difference” then guess what “love” would correspond to? It would be SAMENESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So, the Empedoclean worldview, in these terms, would be: Perfect SAMENESS is disrupted by the saboteur DIFFERENCE, and then a huge, turbulent process has to take place in which SAMENESS eventually gains the upper hand and finally eliminates DIFFERENCE, and everything then returns to wonderful, blissful, functional SAMENESS … pure LOVE.
That’s no good at all to Rebhahn. SAMENESS IS THE LAST THING IN THE WORLD HE WANTS TO ENDORSE. He detested the Hive Mind for supposedly being all about sameness. (“You’ll notice their ‘unity’ is always in terms of hives or swarms, which reflects mindless sameness.” – MorgueOfficial)
So, Rebhahn’s ludicrous system goes like this:
It is WONDERFUL for Unity to introduce DIFFERENCE and thus for UNITY TO EXPLORE DIVERSITY and then when everyone is wonderfully different and diverse that will – SOMEHOW – constitute UNITY! Except it won’t. It’s the opposite of what Empedocles actually taught. To have unity, everyone must converge, they must ultimately become functionally the SAME (via reason and logic). They must abolish difference and diversity in order to restore unity! Love must overcome strife. Love must beat hate. Unity must defeat division. Sameness must be accepted over difference. And that’s the very last thing Rebhahn would ever support, even as he claims that his sick, degenerate views – full of hate, strife, divergence, and division – are actually “enlightened”. He is INVERTING Empedocles (!), just as he inverts every great philosopher to make them fit his sick malignancy, his compulsion to demand that the world kneel to his PERSONAL mania for perversion, difference, degeneration, divergence, diversity, for the right to do whatever he fucking likes regardless of others. Total far-right libertarian insanity. Extreme individualism taken to its diseased conclusion: all-out war on the human race by individual nutjobs!
Fuck them. The People will crush these anomic anarchists … the vermin and plague in our midst. We WILL be unified. Reason and logic demand it. The “diverse” – the antithesis – are the exact enemy of human convergence on global unity, in preparation for a Star Trek future. The “divergent” cannot to be allowed to block the enlightened, divine path of the convergent. Only the convergent can end racism, sexism, nationalism, and all the rest of the divergent crap! When the people are UNITED in reason and logic, when we have brought anomic, sick, divergent, extremist anarchists like Corey Rebhahn and the Woke to heel, then we can at last create a COMMUNITY of gods around a round table – not a disgusting hierarchy of malignant narcissists demanding attention.
Here are a couple of neat diagrams illustrating the Empedoclean worldview:
(Here we have, shown on the right, a domain of pure strife, pure entropy = CHAOS. That is what Rebhahn’s difference, divergence and diversity would lead to … absolute anomie and anarchy … the war of all against all.)
Gordon Campbell wrote,
“Cosmology … Empedocles also posits two cosmic forces which work upon the elements in both creative and destructive ways. These he personifies as Love (Philia) – a force of attraction and combination and Strife (Neikos) a force of repulsion and separation. Whether these cosmic forces are to be envisaged in simply mechanistic terms as descriptions of the way things happen, or as expressions of internal properties of the elements, or as external forces that act upon the elements, is not clear. It is also unclear whether the two forces are to be seen as impersonal mechanistic physical forces or as intelligent divinities that act in purposive ways in creation and destruction. Evidence can be found for all these interpretations. What is clear is that these two forces are engaged in an eternal battle for domination of the cosmos and that they each prevail in turn in an endless cosmic cycle. The details of this cosmic cycle are also difficult to establish, but the most widely accepted interpretation is represented in the following diagram (shown). … Beginning from the top of the diagram and proceeding clockwise, when Love is completely dominant she draws all the elements fully together into a Sphere in which, although the elements are not fused together into a single mass, each is indistinguishable from the others. The Sphere then, is an a-cosmic state during which no matter can exist, and no life is possible. Then as Love’s power gradually weakens and Strife begins to grow in power, he gradually separates out the elements from the Sphere until there is enough separation for matter to come into existence, for the world to be created and for all life to be born. When Strife has achieved total domination we again get an a-cosmic state in which the elements are separated completely and the world and all life is destroyed in a Whirl. Then Love begins to increase in power and to draw the elements together again, and as she does so the world is again created and life is again born. When Love has achieved full dominance we return once more to the sphere. As Empedocles puts it in fr. 17.1-8: ‘A twofold tale I shall tell: at one time it grew to be one only from many, and at another again it divided to be many from one. There is a double birth of what is mortal, and a double passing away; for the uniting of all things brings one generation into being and destroys it, and the other is reared and scattered as they are again being divided. And these things never cease their continuous exchange of position, at one time all coming together into one through Love, at another again being borne away from each other by Strife’s repulsion.’ The cosmos exists in a state of constant flux then, beneath which there is a certain sort of stability in the eternity of the elements. The world is in a constant state of organic evolution, and there appear to be two different creations and two different worlds which have no direct link between them. According the most widely accepted interpretation Empedocles considered that we ourselves inhabit the world under the increasing power of Strife.”
Why is it that Hyperian trolls have endless time for trolling us but no time at all to look up Empedocles, do a bit of research on him and say, “Hey, Morgy Porgy, Empedocles not only has nothing to do with supporting your system, he actually fully contradicts it! He clearly opposes the idea of “Unity introducing difference to relieve boredom or loneliness” and “Unity eagerly exploring Diversity.”
The way Hyperians work is that 100% of what we say is unconditionally rejected and trolled by them, often involving the most bizarre, illogical comments anyone could ever utter, while 100% of what Rebhahn says is unconditionally accepted by them. Doubt is inconceivable in Hyperianism. These are Abrahamists – people of absolute faith.
Rebhahn says Orwellian Big Brother things like “unity in difference”; “unity in divergence”; unity in diversity”; “unity in disunity”, and no one blinks an eye. Nor would they blink an eye if Rebhahn said, “unity in war”, “unity in hate”, “unity in strife”, “unity in conflict” … “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.” (Orwell).
It is simply STAGGERING how brainwashed and groomed Hyperians are and how eagerly they repeat his contradictory statements about unity being advanced by disunity (“diversity”). All of these people calls themselves “artists” and “freethinkers” (we call them morons) and yet not one of them can ever raise their voice to Rebhahn. Not a single person can express a doubt. This is pure Abrahamic faith in a monotheistic God. There is only one crime in Hyperianism … and that is EVER to doubt Corey Rebhahn, even when he is saying one insane thing after another. It truly is an astonishing thing to see. Morons accept whatever the king of the morons says unconditionally – and yet troll us – the originators of ont math!
WTF!
Deathbycrimson: Marilyn Manson is God ♥
[Mad little Corey, clearly realizing he was very different from anyone else, worshiped MARILYN MANSON and tried to copy him. He then worshiped the Joker and copied him.]
Deathbycrimson: It’s hard to frown and draw a dick shaped alien … Believe me, I have notebooks full.
[We bet you do!]
Deathbycrimson: Why do people always take pictures of their food … why not their shit?
[Everything you do is shit!]
Deathbycrimson: Now, I’m not a big fan of country, But Luke Bryan is an exception … he has an amazing voice and a NICE ASS! I mean, what!? xD I’d tap that /.\ xD
I’m just going to embarrass myself more, so I’m going to go xD bye.
[Yeah, stop digging, mate!]
Tags: Corey Rebhahn, Morgue Official, Morgen Night, Hyperianism, Morgue from Freakshow, Hyperian, Hyperianism Quotes, AMC Freakshow, Inner Star Actualization, Cult of Hyperianism, Hyperian Founder, Morgue Official Real Name, What is Hyperianism, Hyperianism Beliefs, Morgue Official Wikipedia