Is Hyperianism A Lie? Does Morgue Official Exist?

Corey Rebhahn (Morgue Official) said, “Is Christianity a lie? Did Jesus Christ Actually Exist? It’s a question that has been asked by many, but few have dared to explore the truth. Today, we’ll uncover information over a century old by a 33rd degree mason that claims to hold the truth about Christianity and it reveals that it’s nothing like you’ve been told, and the church has hidden a great secret that if revealed would shock the world.”

So, “Is Hyperianism a lie? Does Morgue Official actually exist? It’s a question that has been asked by many, but few have dared to explore the truth. Today, we’ll uncover information over several hours old by an AC/PI author that exposes the truth about Hyperianism and it reveals that it’s nothing like you’ve been told, and the cult leader has hidden a great secret that if revealed would shock the world.”

Well, that’s what we would say if we were playing the clickbait tricks that Morgue Official specializes in. But, hey, if you want to see Morgy Porgy being very different from how you imagine him to be and how he presents himself in his deadstreams, just check out these videos:

https://twitter.com/MorgueOfficial/status/709938637463367680
https://twitter.com/MorgueOfficial/status/934933125439766528
https://www.facebook.com/MorgueOfficial/videos/979125535460105
https://www.facebook.com/MorgueOfficial/videos/963040907068568
https://www.facebook.com/MorgueOfficial/videos/912463428792983
https://www.facebook.com/MorgueOfficial/videos/908561315849861
https://www.facebook.com/MorgueOfficial/videos/907600295945963
https://www.facebook.com/MorgueOfficial/videos/1020678214638170
https://www.facebook.com/MorgueOfficial/videos/1019632368076088
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apliDomXhfM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2BJAN2HZE8&t=118s

Not at all the person he poses as, right?

The truth is that Rebhahn is a psychopath.
Rebhahn is a liar.
Rebhahn is a grifter.
Rebhahn is a huckster.
Rebhahn is a hustler.
Rebhahn is a conman.
Rebhahn is a criminal.
Rebhahn swats his critics.
Rebhahn issues lawsuits against his critics.
Rebhahn smears his critics.
Rebhahn cancels his critics.
Rebhahn is a malignant narcissist.
Rebhahn made a false and malicious complaint to the FBI, a felony.
Rebhahn makes $300,000 a year from his grifting operation and lives in a swanky apartment in Hollywood, one of the most expensive places on earth.

Rebhahn is one of the creepiest people in the world. He is a staggeringly mentally ill individual engaged in a mind-boggling con to dupe suckers. Rebhahn is a pervert. Anyone who supports this man is EVIL.

Hyperianism is a sick and dangerous cult led by an exceptionally toxic and sinister man … non-binary Corey Rebhahn (Morgue Official, Morgen Night, the Night Bringer, the Terror of Men, the Shock Surgeon, Mister Morgue).

Here’s what Rebhahn said about himself:

“Freak, Monster, Witch, Murderer. … My name is Morgue, I am an extreme stunt artist and performer on the TV series FREAKSHOW on AMC. I REJECT the anesthetic of MORALITY and religion. My blood will set me free. ‘Will’ is the knife that removes weakness and all that obstructs the path to vitality. Weeding out the weaknesses of the mind and limits of the body, I believe in overcoming resistance. Not contentment but constant self-improvement. Wake up. Sacrifice the sheep and become God.”

Why do hundreds of people worship this sick fuck? It’s not as if he hasn’t openly stated his psychopathic agenda! He has even confessed to being a murderer! Why haven’t the police arrested him and questioned him? Oh right, his dad is a cop and Rebhahn may well be an FBI Cointelpro agent.

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” – Edmund Burke

If all of that wasn’t bad enough, Rebhahn now continuously lies to his suckers about the true nature of reality. Let’s go through Rebhahn’s total nonsense about all of us being “One and Many”, the foundational claim of Hyperianism.

Rebhahn said,

“We are all actually truly individual eternal minds, but we have the capacity to be an identity.”

What does it mean to be a “truly individual eternal mind”? It means, of course, that your mind is yours forever. It can’t be anyone else’s mind. It can’t change into someone else’s mind. Someone else’s mind can’t change into it. It can’t merge with someone else’s mind because then it wouldn’t be a “true individual”. It wouldn’t be an individual at all.

So, this is all very simple and clear cut. Once it is asserted that we are all truly individual eternal minds, there is a whole inevitable, inviolable logic associated with that. We are dealing with an eternal collection, set, or hive of individual minds. We are, by incontestable logic, NEVER an ontological “One Mind”.

There are eight billion humans with individual minds. Imagine these eight billion humans had a “One Mind”. There would be no individuals at all. Humans would just be nodes of this One Mind (the Human Networked Mind, the Human Flower of Life), incapable of acting independently, of having their own thoughts and exercising free will. No individual could imagine anything more horrific than being in a “One Mind” universe because it would mean the annihilation of all individualism. All “individuals” would be illusory. Or there would only be one individual – the One Mind itself – existing entirely alone … pure SOLIPSISM.

So, logically, you simply CANNOT assert a reality comprised of true, individual eternal minds and ALSO assert a reality comprising only One Mind. Yet this is the insane basis of Hyperianism, its central, defining claim, its “We are One and Many” mantra, its “Absolute perspective”, its supposed “solution” to all the world’s ills.

Incredibly, Rebhahn thought that Leibniz held this “One and Many” view, literally citing “Leibniz’s law” as the basis of his crazy claim. Leibniz actually said the precise opposite: “Each monad, indeed, must be different from every other monad. For there are never in nature two beings which are exactly alike, and in which it is not possible to find a difference either internal or based on an intrinsic property.”

Monads are unique substances. They can never “collapse” into one monad, One Mind, as Rebhahn insanely claims. He speaks of a Unity/Identity. What a joke this guy is. Monads are of course absolutely NOT an identity. It’s literally impossible. Monads are inherently unique. Rebhahn, hilariously, doesn’t actually understand the concept of identity. By Leibniz’s law (!), different things cannot be identical. Rebhahn claims that different minds can be and are “an identity”, meaning that there is only actually one mind, one monad. So, all individuals become illusions since they cannot be real, true, eternal beings.

Rebhahn got so baffled by Leibniz’s law that he believed that different things in the same state were actually one thing, the same thing, One Mind. How stupid can this guy get? And he built the whole Hyperian shambles around this fallacy. And not a single one of his cult slaves blinked.

Isn’t it hilarious that the Hyperian cult slaves listen to Rebhahn spouting this “identity” nonsense and not one of them actually understands what Rebhahn is claiming and how it totally violates Leibniz’s law. It just shows how dumb this cult is and how dumb these cultists are.

None of these people actually cares what Rebhahn says as long as he delivers a Woke, lgbtq message. It’s that message that counts for these people, not the truth of what Rebhahn talks about. And Rebhahn KNOWS that none of his cultists cares what he says, which is why he doesn’t worry at all about lying and stating blatant fallacies. He knows it will have no consequences since zero of his cult slaves would leave the cult no matter how wrong he is (and he is TOTALLY wrong). This is not any new phenomenon. All Abrahamists go on being Abrahamists even though Abrahamism has been logically and rationally destroyed, just as Hyperianism has.

Rebhahn said,

“We are all stemming from a single place and all of it depends upon it.”

Logically, this is of course means that we are NOT eternal, independent minds. We are “dependencies!! We depend on the “One Mind”. Rebhahn has totally contradicted himself. You cannot be both independent and dependent. That’s a category error.

Then Rebhahn insists, “But we are all truly individual minds.” Rebhahn just keeps spouting nonsense. Is he so dumb that he doesn’t grasp even the most rudimentary logic, or does he just not care in the slightest?

Rebhahn said, “That is not an illusion as some systems teach.” Rebhahn is claiming that we are ONTOLOGICALLY both a One Mind and Many Minds, whereas Buddhism, for example, claims that there is really only One Mind and so all of the apparent Many Minds are illusory. That’s a statement that can be philosophically defended. Hyperianism cannot be. Rebhahn does not get basic logic.

You cannot have an ontological One Mind and also ontological Many Minds. You can logically have one or the other, but not both. Yet Hyperianism is literally predicated on this absurdity.

Take someone such as PUKES, one of the most fanatical and deranged Hyperians, with a pathological hatred of sameness! She said,

“So basically the AC expects unity to become reality without diversity.”

We don’t “expect” anything. Unity MEANS the absence of diversity! This is definitional. Here’s how the Online Etymology Dictionary refers to “diversity”:

“mid-14c., diversite, “variety, diverseness;” late 14c., “quality of being diverse, fact of difference between two or more things or kinds; variety; separateness; that in which two or more things differ,” mostly in a neutral sense, from Old French diversete “difference, diversity, unique feature, oddness:” also “wickedness, perversity” (12c., Modern French diversité), from Latin diversitatem (nominative diversitas) “contrariety, contradiction, disagreement;” also, as a secondary sense, “difference, diversity,” from diversus “turned different ways” (in Late Latin “various”), past participle of divertere (see divert). A negative meaning, “perverseness, being contrary to what is agreeable or right; conflict, strife; perversity, evil” existed in English from late 14c. but was obsolete from 17c.”

So, “diversity” necessitates MULTIPLICITY (“two or more things”). It cannot by definition be associated with Unity, with Oneness. You can have diversity only when you have more than one thing! It shows you how stupid these Hyperians are – and simply don’t understand basic English and basic definitions – when they claim that UNITY can and should involve diversity. By definition, it cannot. Diversity requires disunity, division, multiplicity! But it shows you how people such as PUKES are incapable of understanding our material – because they can’t even understand English. You can’t have a diversity in a Unity, yet these moronic Hyperians believe you can, and indeed base their whole fallacious ideology on it, and refuse to accept the actual definition of Unity, which excludes diversity!

PUKES said,

“So everyone becomes the same. No unique expression or individuality. Everybody becomes clones of each other. That’s their logic in a NOT [sic] SHELL.”

Logic is logic. You cannot have a functional UNITY unless you eliminate all functional differences. This is just 1 + 1 = 2.

Hilariously, Rebhahn makes an even stronger sameness claim on behalf of Hyperianism (including PUKES!). Rebhahn explicitly refers to an ontological UNITY/IDENTITY – a universal ONE MIND. In Illuminism, all monads are always ontologically different but can achieve functional unity. But they are eternal UNIQUE substances – individuals – which PUKES ought to be fully onboard with. But she’s not. PUKES believes – because Rebhahn ordered her to believe it – that we become ONE MIND, and thus all individuals are WIPED OUT. There is no unique expression (!), no individuality (!) and everyone becomes EXACTLY THE SAME (an IDENTITY!). We are not clones … we are an identical entity!!!!! And PUKES accepts that 100%!!!!!! Ho, ho, ho.

Here’s the game, folks. The Big Bang concerns a state of functional SAMENESS (zero entropy) projecting a massively entropic state of DIFFERENCE and then this entropic state of difference must eliminate all of its entropy (difference) by introducing more and more sameness, until all projected monadic minds have eliminated all their DIVERSITY and become FUNCTIONALLY identical (though not of course ontologically identical).

PUKES literally refuses to accept how reality works because she is ideologically committed to DIVERSITY and ideologically detests SAMENESS. So this PUKES person actually rejects the whole basis of reality because it offends her Woke lgbtq ideology. That’s how mad these people are. They only accept “answers” that they emotionally approve of. They totally reject reason and logic because these deliver the wrong ideological results! That’s the mad fantasy world these people live in.

The whole game of Hyperianism is to run together contradictory terms – such as “UNITY” and “DIVERSITY” – and accept both. This is pure doublethink. Orwell said,

“His mind slid away into the labyrinthine world of doublethink. To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which canceled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself. That was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word ‘doublethink’ involved the use of doublethink.”

That’s what Hyperianism is all about. That’s what PUKES is all about. She completely supports DIVERSITY and HATES Unity (which is of course definitionally about sameness), yet she claims to support UNITY. How absurd. You see, these Hyperians are hyper-emotionalists incapable of using reason and logic. They can’t even understand basic definitions. You cannot have a UNITY predicated on DIVERSITY. Only retarded Hyperians think you can, because they are incapable of using reason and logic. They string words together that they like, such as “Unity” and “Diversity”, which totally contradict each other. Why not say “Unity and Disunity”? Or “Unity and Division”? It’s the same game. If you promote diversity, you have ipso facto broken Unity because you must have multiple things in order to have a diversity.

Vedantu says, “Diversity refers to variety, which is irrelevant to the word ‘unity’, which means oneness.” Stupid people such as PUKES and Rebhahn just invent perverted definitions of words. They claim that Unity/Oneness is expressed through diversity – a literal category error. A Unity cannot be a Diversity!

But this is what we’re up against with these lunatic Hyperians. They just invent mad shit and then believe it 100%. That’s why you can never persuade these people with reason and logic. They don’t accept it. Look at how PUKES argues. She doesn’t care what the Truth requires – absolute functional unity … everything being in the same functional state. No, she requires reality to be what she wants it to be – a diversity. So fuck the truth, fuck reason and logic. This nutjob actually believes that reason and logic and mathematics have a problem with “sameness,” “wholeness”, “completeness”, “unity” and instead support “diversity”, “difference”, “disunity”, “divergence”, “discord”, “division” … CHAOS. Chaos is anti-reason, anti-logic, anti math!!! You could never have a mathematical reality based on chaos.

Rebhahn said,

“We do have independent existence IN A CERTAIN WAY.”

What an odd thing to say. He’s practically saying we do not have independence. Logically, we either do or do not have independent existence. There’s no “in a certain way” about it. There’s no conditionality, no contingency.

Rebhahn said,

“Independent in the sense that we don’t rely on another for our existence. However, we exist with the CAPACITY to be an identity.”

Word salad alert. This game that Rebhahn plays is so funny. If all minds are an ontological “identity” then of course they are not minds (plural) at all … they are ONE MIND. If they are One Mind then they are ipso facto NOT Many Minds. There’s no point in mentioning a “capacity” unless it is actually realized, i.e., we become an ACTUAL IDENTITY (hence an ontological One Mind, meaning that the “many” minds DEPEND on this One Mind and thus have no eternal, necessary, independent existence!).

Rebhahn said,

“And when we are in identity we are One Mind.”

Well, how do you like them apples, PUKES? Are you going to condemn Rebhahn for making a much more extreme “sameness” claim than the AC have ever made?! Why don’t you send him a superchat blasting him for wiping out all minds, all uniqueness, all individuality, all diversity? Ho, ho, ho.

These cretins have trapped themselves in their own web of stupidity! And they are total hypocrites – simultaneously condemning sameness while advocating the maximum sameness literally possible!

Rebhahn of course relies on his disastrous misunderstanding of Leibniz’s law to “justify” this embarrassing “identity” claim of his. He has made an astonishing error but MUST keep repeating it because he claims to be the greatest genius of all time and he has made this his signature statement of Hyperianism, i.e., we are both an ontological “One Mind” and we are also independent, different, eternal, ontological Many Minds. This is a self-evident category error, but of course Rebhahn is a man with no education and no qualifications, so why would anyone be surprised that he says things that NO intelligent person would ever say? And why would anyone be surprised that he gets his strongest support from totally uneducated people such as PUKES, and people with learning disabilities such as Dyslexic Fairy and Kassidy? 1 + 1 = 2.

Remember how it goes. If you posit an ontological One Mind then, logically, you are AUTOMATICALLY committed to explaining “Many Minds” as illusory, as phenomenal, as conditional, as temporal, as contingent (dependent on the ontology of the Source Mind).

If, instead, you posit an ontological Many Minds (what we refer to as a Hive Mind) then the only way you can get any unity out of that is by asserting that they can be in, or they can attain, the same state and be in Functional Unity (but of course not Ontological Unity).

Rebhahn ignored logic and claimed that both an ontological One Mind exists AND ontological Many Minds exist … INDEED, THIS IS THE FOUNDATIONAL CLAIM OF HYPERIANISM. It is ESSENTIAL to Rebhahn’s Woke, New Age narrative. It is the entire ground of his claim that diverse people should be WORSHIPED – because, supposedly, we are all actually the same person (as in Egg Philosophy) … because we are all really One Mind. And yet Rebhahn also claims that we are eternal minds, which means of course that we are uncaused and uncreated and that means there is NO ontological One Mind. This is the fundamental Hyperian category error. The only system that has made a similar fallacious claim is Trinitarian CHRISTIANITY. It claimed that three different, eternal persons (Many Minds, we would say) are also one God (One Mind). This is Rebhahn’s exact claim!

The Trinitarian Christians tried to justify their claim by saying that all three Gods (persons) were ONE SUBSTANCE (One Ontology). So, we have One God Substance somehow expressing itself through three “independent” God Persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit), which also completely depend on each other! It was obviously a Corey Rebhahn of ye olde times who thought up this insane formula. Rebhahn actually makes a more incredible statement than the Trinitarians. The Trinitarians insisted on the same three “Persons” being of One Substance, which is how they ensured a monotheism. Their logical problem was how One Substance could be associated with three eternal Persons, especially when a strict logical sequence was applied (the Father BEGAT the Son, and the Spirit PROCEEDED from the Father and Son). Of course, there is no logical explanation. It’s a “mystery of faith”! Much like Hyperianism!!!

In Hyperianism, there is One Substance (the One Mind – a “Unity/Identity”) and there are also Many Substances (the Eternal Minds – a “diversity, multiplicity, particularization”). Well, there is of course no possible logic to defend this stance, a category error.

Just as the Trinitarians needed three Gods to tell the stories they wanted to tell, but were constrained by wanting to be [Jewish] monotheists rather than [Pagan] polytheists, so had to invent an absurd scheme where three Gods and one God were somehow the same (as if by magic!), Hyperians need many minds (to tell the “diverse” story they are obsessed with) and also One Mind, to “explain” why diversity should be 100% supported by everyone, so they have to believe in an absurd scheme where Many Minds and One Mind are somehow the same (as if by magic!).

It’s HILARIOUS that Hyperians ridicule the faith of Christians while having the exact same foundational belief, but repurposing it to defend DIVERSITY rather than MONOTHEISM. These Hyperians are diverse monotheists!

All these people are dunces and have invested all their faith in a beauty parlor “technician” with no education and no qualifications, so what do you expect? 1 + 1 = 2. The thing that gets us is how these people of absolute faith claim to be guided by logic and reason and to exercise critical thinking. They literally have no critical, rational and logical capabilities at all, which is why they’re in a mad cult led by a charlatan, a cult that is basically Christianity 2.0, where Christian Monotheism is replaced by Woke Diversity.

Rebhahn believed that Leibniz’s law was the secret sauce to justify his mad position, but, being a cretin, he simply got Leibniz’s law all wrong. Why would anyone be surprised? He has zero qualifications as a philosopher and he is plagiarizing the system of others, while not understanding the content he is plagiarizing (!).

Monads are unique substances, meaning that they are eternally individual, independent autonomous minds with their own haecceity and aseity. This is their basic definition. As we saw, Leibniz himself, in his published Monadology, explicitly said “Each monad, indeed, must be different from every other monad. For there are never in nature two beings which are exactly alike, and in which it is not possible to find a difference either internal or based on an intrinsic property.” So, how could someone take Leibniz’s law – which Leibniz used to explain how no two monads could ever be identical (!) – to assert that all monads are in fact identical and form a Unity/Identity – a Universal One Mind (Monad)? Well, it takes a bona fide moron to arrive at such a position. Step forward and take a bow, Corey Rebhahn.

This retard literally contradicted Leibniz (!) – one of the greatest geniuses of all time – and did so via “Leibniz’s law”. You couldn’t make it up. You would imagine this degree of cretinism to be impossible. Rebhahn literally took the law that Leibniz used to explain that all monads are unique substances to claim instead that they are all one substance and indeed one monad (a unity/identity). And even though we have explained all of this MANY TIMES, Rebhahn keeps stating his insane fallacy over and over again, and being unconditionally believed by his insane worshipers such as PUKES every time.

Is it any wonder we are still saddled with Abrahamism given how willing people are to go on believing in formally disproven NONSENSE? Rebhahn hasn’t even read Leibniz. He knows nothing about Leibniz and actually dismissed him in one of his deadstreams. As everyone knows, Rebhahn pretends to be Hegelian. He never refers to himself as Leibnizian. And that’s the whole problem. Monads are LEIBNIZIAN. They are not Hegelian.

Illuminism is a Leibnizian system that takes some Hegelian elements. Hyperianism is an insane take on Hegel and makes insane misinterpretations of Leibnizian monads. The whole thing is a total joke. But why wouldn’t it be? – Rebhahn is a freakshow sword swallower. There is no magic going on here. There are no mysteries. A stupid man – Corey Rebhahn – is making stupid statements. BECAUSE HE’S STUPID! 1 + 1 = 2. There is no logical reason for Corey Rebhahn to imagine himself a great thinker. There IS a logical reason why he should not – he has no education and no qualifications, has never been near a university in his life and has NEVER physically interacted with mathematicians, scientists and philosophers and NEVER once been challenged by any of the cult slaves (quasi-Abrahamists) who worship him.

At no time does Rebhahn have to justify his fallacies to anyone. He simply states them and they are then automatically 100% accepted and revered by his worshipers, his cult slaves like PUKES.

The sole reason why all of this has happened – a really stupid, uneducated, unqualified person getting totally out of his intellectual depth – is that Rebhahn is a malignant narcissist, a somatic narcissist who also aspires to be a cerebral narcissist, and this exact pathological condition causes these people to make staggeringly grandiose and delusional statements. THAT’S THE NATURE OF THE MENTAL ILLNESS! And of course it takes mentally ill people to go along with the insanity these madmen spout. Just look at Hyperianism. Just look at people like Fat Jan, Mad Bitchell, Necrophil the Carpet Cleaner, Wonderpoop the Tarot Card reader, Dyslexic Fairy, Kassidy, PUKES, and all the rest of the mad muppets. Do they have even one brain cell to share between them?

Rebhahn simultaneously DENIES that we are unique substances and claims that we are all an ontological ONE MIND and also INSISTS that we are unique eternal substances. It’s a category error, an absolute breakdown in logic, a meltdown in reason. Yet this lunatic gibberish is the FOUNDATIONAL CLAIM of Hyperianism! Seriously, you couldn’t make it up. This lunatic Rebhahn even claimed that this mind-boggling fallacy was an incredible breakthrough in ont math! That’s how fucked in the head this guy is. And yet all of his glove puppets go along with everything he says. It’s an astounding thing to witness, but also shows how hard it is to change humanity and get humanity to evolve. These Hyperians are just hyper-emotional Abrahamists and humanity MUST get rid of all these people [never harm self or others!] if it is to evolve. It has no choice. Stupid people cannot be allowed to hold back humanity. Enough is enough.

Rebhahn, eyes bulging (he does that A LOT!), said, “So we exist as a system that has the capacity for identity and multiplicity. It’s, it’s, it’s … we are One and Many at the same time. So that’s where the difficulty comes in when people ask is reality one mind … IT IS ONE MIND that is composed of MANY MINDS that have the capacity to exist in IDENTITY OR MULTIPLICITY. A really good example that I like to use is the flower of life. If you look at the flower of life, it’s many different circles. It’s a bunch of circles. If you think of each circle as being like a soul or a mind, then you can see that there is ONE flower of life that you could say is ONE MIND but it’s made up of MANY MINDS.”

And we’re back to the CHRISTIAN TRINITY and St Patrick’s SHAMROCK (three leaves in ONE plant) but now it’s a Hyperian MULTIPLICITY – many minds in ONE MIND. Ho, ho, ho. This is just sooooooo funny.

You cannot be a unique ontological substance (individual monad) and also a One Mind (where you have the same substance as every other monad, if we can even refer to you as a monad in such circumstances … by the way, we can’t!).

If you’ve noticed, Rebhahn NEVER refers to ontology/substance in any of these claims he makes. He NEVER says that many unique ontological monads become a single ontological One Mind – because then he could never say that all minds are eternal ontologies. He tries his hardest to avoid addressing ontology – because even this moron knows he’s fucked if he actually spells out ontologically what he’s claiming. (It’s the same ontological problem that fucks the Christian Trinitarians – how can you have a single ontology as multiple “persons”, all of which are claimed to be eternally real!)

And this cretin Rebhahn CANNOT back down on his total fallacy and just has to keep repeating it forever. And none of his cult slaves can EVER challenge him about this, and none ever does! (Especially not PUKES!) It’s HILARIOUS – the dumb leading the even dumber! And people such as Fat Jan, Necrophil, Mad Bitchell and the Wonderpoop sit in their private mod chat agreeing 100% with everything Rebhahn says. Not once in the private mod chat did we see any mod say to Rebhahn regarding ANYTHING that he had got it wrong. NOT ONCE. Can you imagine how much of a Fuehrer Bunker the current private mod chat is? Never have you seen four people so groomed and brainwashed as in that private chat. Four people KNOW whenever they comment that they will NEVER under any circumstances be casting any doubt on anything Rebhahn says. And that is somehow supposed to lead to an intelligent, dialectical system. Ho, ho, ho.

If Rebhahn loves Hegel so much, why doesn’t he demand that his worshipers provide a Hegelian antithesis and constantly challenge his claims? As if! Ho, ho, ho. Hyperianism is an utterly anti-Hegelian system.

Rebhahn said, “Now you could also imagine that those circles collapse down until they’re IDENTICAL, and so they all overlay each other until it APPEARS that there is only one circle in the center.”

But of course we’re not talking about APPEARANCE, we’re talking about ONTOLOGICAL IDENTITY, supposedly via Leibniz’s law, a very precise philosophical instrument with an exact meaning that has nothing to do with APPEARANCE!

“Well, this is them collapsing into IDENTITY”.

Except they’re not. They are ETERNAL, NECESSARY, INDEPENDENT MINDS and they don’t collapse into anything! They remain ontologically separate forever. That’s why we refer to them as eternal and necessary, as unique substances with their own haecceity and aseity. But, as we said, Rebhahn CANNOT retreat from his fallacies. He’s stuck with these foundational errors forever now … because he cannot admit error and none of his cult slaves can call him out on his errors. All of these cretins are now locked in … just like Abrahamists!

Rebhahn said,

“So you see you can have a system that can exist as an IDENTITY and UNITY or MULTIPLICITY AND DIVERSIIY by varying its internal structure.”

This is so funny. Rebhahn is literally claiming that all ontologically distinct monads LOSE their ontological distinction and become ONE MONAD, ONE MIND, and then he is claiming that they can reclaim this ontological distinction, while also claiming that each monad was never anything other than eternal – even though it can’t be if it gets swallowed up by One Mind, One Monad. But, hey, what does this guy care? He gets $300,000 a year for talking crap to morons. It’s not as if he’s ever going to tell the truth, is it? His LIES are extremely lucrative for him and his cult slaves worship him and treat him like a GOD for telling them the lies they want to hear! PUKES can’t get enough of being told that Unity = Diversity! Rebhahn’s never going to voluntarily wind up his cult, is he? His cult will have to be taken away from him.

By the way, the Source is eternal and necessary, immutable and perfect. It absolutely never “varies its internal structure”. It is pure BEING. It is the temporal and contingent projected domain of BECOMING that is mutable, variable, imperfect. Rebhahn’s whole conception of fundamental reality is TOTALLY FALSE. He actually imagines a One Mind becoming a Many Minds and then the Many Minds becoming a One Mind, and so on forever … an absurd infinite regress of the temporal and contingent, with no eternal, necessary, immutable, perfect components (Forms, Ideas, Universals). Rebhahn’s “system” is purely about particulars (Becoming) and has no universals (Being).

Rebhahn said, “So, reality is the dynamic structure that has the capacity to be in Identity and Unity OR in multiplicity and diversity and it can exist as One, as a Network, or it can exist as One, as an identity.”

Don’t you laugh at how this conman offers you two “Oneness” claims? Rebhahn says,

“You’re an ontological Unity/Identity via Leibniz’s law, but if you don’t like that then I’ll offer you something else: you’re a non-ontological ‘unity of pattern’, i.e., you’re One because you belong to one system. Don’t worry that these are two totally different ‘Oneness’ claims. You don’t care what I say. You LOVE me and that’s all that counts. Right?!”

Ah, the MYSTERY of Hyperian FAITH.

Rebhahn said,

“So, reality is complicated. It’s never a quick and simple answer.”

There IS a quick and simple answer. This is total BOLLOCKS. It’s a fallacy, a category error, a contradiction in terms. There is no Unity/Identity of minds. That is a flagrant error regarding Leibniz’s law. And everything in a single system is by definition part of a “One” (the one system itself) … that does not mean you can describe them as One and Many. No one goes around saying that all humans belong to humanity (the human “system”), so all humans are “One and Many”. It’s a vacuous non-statement, lacking all utility.

You know all Rebhahn’s shtick about “We are all One and Many … and if only people realized we are all actually One then they would celebrate the Many in their diversity.” Well, people have been saying forever that “We’re all members (the Many) of the human race (the One) and so why do we hate and fight each other?” When has ANYONE ever listened to this dumb argument?! Even Homer Simpson laughed at it! Yet this is Rebhahn’s exact Woke argument. It’s as old as the hills and no one has ever bought it, and no one ever will except Rebhahn’s retarded worshipers, who accept anything their cretinous leader tells them. These people have zero interest in the Truth. Just like Abrahamists, they are interested in a “community” of the like-minded (all Hyperians are extremist lgbtq activists and radicals, promoting a hyper-extreme non-binary agenda since two of the group’s leaders – Rebhahn and the Immense Fatness of Jan both identify as non-binary).

Rebhahn literally said,

“Here’s the thing. We are all part of the same structure. So when you reach a higher consciousness, you realize we are all ONE. Even though we’re all Many. We’re One and Many at the same time. We are all connected and reflections of one another. So, to do evil to another is really to harm yourself. … We’re all in this together. We’re all reflections of each other. To hurt another person would be just as ridiculous as stabbing yourself in the hand. Obviously. you’re not going to stab yourself in the hand and once one reaches a higher consciousness, you’re not going to do wrong to another person.”

Word Salad at its most salady. How can Rebhahn even keep a straight face when he spouts this pure nonsense? It’s Woke, New Age drivel. You would think these people had never heard of evolution, the survival of the fittest, nature being red in tooth and claw, the Hegelian dialectic of clashing opposites, and so on.

Not “stabbing yourself in the hand?” Hmmmm. Nigel Warburton said, “The great pessimistic philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer was born in Danzig on February 22, 1788. As a student, he took courses in entomology, and he later used a macabre description of an insect in his writing. The Australian bulldog ant when cut into two, he wrote, keeps attacking itself. The head bites the tail and the tail stings the head. This continues until both parts are dead or other ants come along and drag off what’s left. This image encapsulates Schopenhauer’s view of the struggle of individuals against each other. We are all part of the will, the life force that surges through everything, and so at the deepest metaphysical level are one. Yet as individuals we’re blind to this and turn on each other. Human violence is as self-destructive as the ant’s self-mutilation.”

So much for Rebhahn’s entire shtick!

earthwindfireable said, “This ‘star seed’ woo-woo whacky nonsense has to stop. My opinion? Everyone thinks they’re special but few people have the actions that make them special. Anyway, Morgue is no longer doing Hyperianism and I’m not sure what Hyperianism even is and what a Hyperian does. Onto another point: Morgue needs to stop the live, super-chats and e-begging for money. Cringe and not cool.”

Marshall Jordan said,

“New subscriber here! Love the channel! So entertaining. The amount of work you put into seeming intelligent just to fall so absolutely mind bogglingly short is one of the more impressive than most things on the youtubes. It’s as good as any flatear…. wait a second…🤨🤨🤨 Are you a….nooooo it can’t be. You ARE! YOU’RE FLAT EARTHER!!! Amazing!”

Esther Herbert said,

“The big question: Life only sustains by this system of eat or being eaten… Is it possible to change this system? And would it be possible for humanity to get rid of hierarchy behavior?
I really wonder.”

One day, Hyperianism will undergo an “Unexpected rapid disassembly.”