The NeverEnding Story of Morgue Official’s Mad Lies

It’s an astonishing thing to watch a total conman at work, constantly pretending to be something other than he is to fleece stupid suckers who line up to have their money taken off them. They smile and say thanks while they are being robbed. We’re seeing in microcosm everything that is wrong with the world. To watch the nauseating pervert and criminal Corey Rebhahn (Morgue Official) – a man who maliciously lied to the FBI to get innocent people swatted and has not yet been arrested for his proven lies to the FBI – posing as a “Savior” for his cretinous, feeble, pathetic Hyperian cult slaves … some of the lowest-quality human beings you could ever imagine, of the exact type that Nietzsche dismissed as the “herd”… is to want to vomit. The spectacle is grotesque and sickening.

THIS is why the world is fucked. These people … the cult leaders and their cult followers … must be eliminated from society if society wishes to be healthy and evolve.

Society has had enough of sick and dangerous cults led by predatory narcissists and psychopaths. It’s time for society to end the reign of these monsters. The Age of Cults must be terminated. Society should wage full-scale war on cultists. They must be rooted out of society. This whole “influencer” ecosystem is an abomination that must be made illegal. Celebrity culture itself is something that must be destroyed if humanity is to advance.

What is “celebrity culture”? It is the worship of a few human beings by many human beings. It is DISGUSTING! Who is more disgusting? – the celebrities desperate for worship, or those desperate to worship them? Both are vile and repulsive and an insult to the human race. And influencer culture is the new z-list version of celebrity culture, where malignant narcissist predators – DESPERATE FOR ATTENTION – obsessively look for prey via social media … and so many human beings VOLUNTEER themselves as prey.

Humanity cannot go on like this. It MUST stop attention-obsessed narcs, and it MUST stop people desperate to give all their attention to these people. Look at the sheer degree of obsession that Rebhahn’s cult slaves have for him. They think nothing of sending this malignant man $50 or $100 just to say “Hi” or send him some ridiculous quote. How embarrassing is that? They can’t wait to PAY people … they pay to be ALLOWED to worship narcs. How could humanity have ended up like this? It’s so humiliating.

This is the master-slave culture in full flow, but the slaves aren’t in chains … they are volunteering to be slaves. They WANT to be slaves. This type of human must be … ended. Humanity cannot progress while it generates such people. Humanity will be healthy when there are ZERO influencers and no one has the vaguest idea what “celebrity culture” is. Just imagine a human race where no human worships another human. Such humans won’t worship “gods” either. And at last humanity will be FREE. No more people kneeling and bowing and groveling and worshiping and sending super chats to be praised by someone as if they were … a dog. Which they are.

Humanity is best understood as a collection of dogs and their owners/masters. Humanity must escape from this animal existence it has chosen.

Watch Edgelord Morgue from eight years ago in this short video: “Why I Wear ‘Dark’ Clothing – a Warning Sign to Stay Away If You’re Part of the Problem”:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC5J4UEy0Ng

And check out this Rebhahn video from ten years ago:

“The Message of Mister Morgue” – asking you to become an “INTERN” of his Terrors of Men project (these days he asks you to become a member of his Hyperian cult):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAMl3hsfnLM

Compare and contrast this Edgelord Morgue with today’s Woke Messiah Morgue. The delivery is TOTALLY different. The Edgelord Morgue is absolutely arrogant, obnoxious, contemptuous – a nihilistic psychopath who HATES the world and is fighting the world.

Today’s Deadstream Morgue is all about pity and compassion and loving the world and saving the world … the opposite of his former performance. So, has he undergone a Damascene conversion like St Paul, or is he just … LYING? Edgelord Morgue went nowhere. He didn’t get enough narc supply. This man Corey Rebhahn is so sick and disturbed that he now callously and cynically plays a completely different role … TO CON PEOPLE. Rebhahn knows that sucker women and gay men will not respond to his Edgelord persona, so he just uses a different persona – a creepy Woke one that he knows commands a larger audience and secures much more narcissistic supply and money.

The whole thing is an act, and it’s incredible that people can’t see through it when it’s so blatant. This conman’s victims have blinded themselves to the truth. They don’t want to see it. They refuse to see it. Because seeing the truth doesn’t serve their agenda.

It’s such a strange phenomenon how people hide the truth from themselves. For most people the truth is a choice. They decide what they want it to be. They never accept it as it is.

Aren’t you sick to death of Rebhahn’s constant plundering of Medium dot com? Rebhahn is lazy and such a plagiarist that he doesn’t even think up his own ideas for his videos. He just steals an article from Medium dot com and then spouts his dreary, tedious, fallacious Woke speech – which we’ve all heard countless times – over whatever he has read out. The performance is on autopilot every time. Rebhahn is NEVER original, NEVER authentic, NEVER real. None of his cult slaves care. They will worship whatever shit he gives them.

Rebhahn’s whole shitty performance is just “phoned in”. He puts in no effort. He has no imagination, no intelligence, and no creativity. Asia said he was very lazy, and he obviously is.

Look at how much imagination, intelligence, novelty and creativity goes into our lengthy posts every single day. Rebhahn could never do that in a trillion years. Hyperians detest us because we make them feel ashamed of how limited they are. They love Rebhahn because he tells them they are Hyperaware World Shapers. Ho, ho, ho.

So, let’s go through Rebhahn’s latest dumb statements from his deadstreams. Today, we will once again Rebhahn go through Rebhahn’s nonsense about the PSR. Tomorrow, we will once again go through his “One and Many” drivel.

Rebhahn said yet again that “non-existence is impossible”. This man doesn’t understand what’s he saying. Non-existence is absolutely possible, which is of course why the genius Leibniz asked the fundamental question: why is there something rather than nothing?

Leibniz, unlike the idiot Rebhahn, saw that, on the face of it, NOTHING is the much more likely state. Why wouldn’t it be? It has no need of anything and what could prevent it? “Something” is what is in dire need of explanation, and in fact “something” CANNOT be explained independently of nothing. It has to become a special type of nothing, which we call “structured nothing” or “net zero”, meaning that you can have “something” provided that its net effect is nothing, so, like non-existence, it requires nothing and nothing can prevent it.

If we want to somewhat mangle concepts, we could EASILY state that non-existence has mandatory existence (!!!), but has no properties and and no consequences, so it amounts to a universal ABSENCE (it is existence as absence). It cannot interfere with formal existence, which is universal PRESENCE (present existence as opposed to absent existence). We can actually model this situation using precise mathematics. “Non-existence” (or absent existence in our new term) is the collection of all static points with no properties. Existence (present existence) is the collection of all moving points (moving in the precise, structured way mandated by the PSR), which are net zeros in relation to the precise mathematical trajectory they take, defined by Euler’s formula.

Rebhahn said,

“The Absolute exists because it must exist to PREVENT the impossible from existing.”

This is sooooo funny. Rebhahn talks about “impossibility” as if it were something that COULD exist (it obviously can’t because … IT’S IMPOSSIBLE!), and is only being prevented from existing by “the Absolute”, which is thus conceived of as something in a kind of existential combat with impossibility.

No intelligent person would EVER say that existence exists because it is preventing impossibility from existing – yet this absurdity is the basis of Rebhahn’s claim to have solved the greatest philosophical question of all time (!).

Any intelligent person knows that a “positive” proof of existence musty be given, i.e., you must explain exactly what existence is and why it must exist … why its properties necessitate it – eternally.

Rebhahn ignores all of that and claims that existence must exist because it’s in some bizarre competition with what cannot exist! Logically, what cannot exist (impossible existence) cannot play any role at all in what existence is and why existence exists!

Rebhahn’s claims are comedically dumb. Rebhahn doesn’t even have any means to define “impossible”. What is it as a supposed competitor to existence? How would we establish its “properties”? In fact, how could we say anything at all about it given that it is “IMPOSSIBLE“?!

Fichte, Schelling and Hegel got rid of Kant’s notorious thing in itself because it was ontologically and epistemologically incoherent. How, they rightly asked, could you know of the existence of something whose properties were unknowable? How can you even refer to the unknown as a known thing? (Kant said that the thing in itself must exist even though we could know nothing about it – a category error!)

Rebhahn does something even worse. Instead of Kant’s knowable phenomenal existence versus unknowable noumenal existence, Rebhahn talks about impossible existence versus possible existence! But how can you refer to impossible existence if it’s, you know, IMPOSSIBLE? Category error. Yet Rebhahn thinks that this category error – the greatest fallacy of all time – is a genius insight on his part, the most wonderful act of genius in human history no less, solving the greatest philosophical problem of all time! Ho, ho, ho.

This same guy also said that he had made a decisive breakthrough in ont math by claiming that “Leibniz’s law” proves that we are all an ontological “One and Many”. Again, this is an absolute fallacy, on a simply breathtaking scale. But this is what this guy does. He has no clue what he’s saying but just says it anyway and then makes the most grandiose claims about his laughable and embarrassing fallacies. But, hey. These things are the actual PROOF that this guy is a malignant narcissist and psychopath. No one without a severe and debilitating pathology would go around claiming to be a genius on the back of ABSOLUTE FALLACIES, 100% disproved by the people whose system the crook Corey Rebhahn plagiarized.

Rebhahn relies on a kind of Hegelian approach to the “Absolute” yet never once did Hegel assert the existence of the Absolute as something to do with impossibility and keeping impossibility at bay in some unfathomable way. Why would he? Hegel was a philosophical genius not a hairdresser working in a beauty parlor!

“Impossible existence” has no relation to existence. Impossible existence is that which by definition cannot exist. And impossible existence can in fact only be referenced with regard to the existence of the principle of sufficient reason – since it is exactly that which is forbidden, excluded, by the PSR, i.e., you must have the PSR before you can make any sense of the notion of the impossible. Without the PSR, the impossible has no technical definition, hence it’s not even possible to say that it’s impossible since you have no criterion or principle or gauge for establishing its impossibility! (The PSR says that random events are impossible; science, by contrast, relies on random events … science literally has no means to establish what is impossible, although it “theologically” regards mind as impossible … but doesn’t have the same hostility towards randomness, even though it cannot account for randomness at all.)

The real question, as Leibniz knew, was to explain why there is something rather than nothing. Total non-existence is absolutely possible and would in fact be MANDATORY if ont math did not have the precise properties it has, by which it can reflect structured nothingness – i.e., net zero that needs nothing and nothing can prevent it, so it has eternal and necessary existence. If ont math did not exist, the alternative would not be “impossible existence”, as Rebhahn insanely claims, it would be non-existence – the most likely ground state of all, hence the default state! We have to be able to explain how existence – as “something” – can nevertheless exist despite not being the natural and obvious default, and we can only do so through showing that something can mimic nothing at all by being “net nothing”. If we could not get “something” to be net nothing then nothing at all could exist since nothing at all would be the mandatory ground state.

Rebhahn said,

“So, the Absolute does not include the impossible.”

The Absolute is the PSR and it DEFINES the impossible – that which is incompatible with the PSR! In that sense, the Absolute (PSR) DOES include the impossible, i.e., it logically caters for its absence from the system! And without the PSR, it would be impossible to define what the impossible is! Scientists say “If it’s not forbidden, it’s compulsory”. But they do not define what is “forbidden”. The PSR does. Anything which does not have a sufficient reason is forbidden. So, you must first have the PSR to establish the forbidden. You cannot define the impossible or even refer to it WITHOUT the PSR. A reality without the PSR is undefinable not “impossible” since “impossible” actually only makes sense in relation to the PSR, i.e., the PSR must be present not absent, to establish what “impossibility” is! (We have elsewhere proposed that it would be mathematically possible to model a non-PSR reality, by imagining points moving without rhyme or reason (CHAOS, in other words). But this “something” would not analytically net to zero, and so is impossible because it could never happen instead of the compulsory ground state of nothing (i.e. nothing at all or net nothing).

Rebhahn said,

“The Absolute includes everything except for the impossible. The Absolute is what actually stands in the way of impossibility existing.”

STOP LAUGHING!

So, Rebhahn literally states that the impossible COULD exist were it not for the Absolute!!! The Absolute is standing in the way of the impossible – suppressing it, blocking it, preventing it. But of course that is already to imagine the impossible as a potential existent – as a possibility – as something having to be actively stopped by something else, when of course the impossible is exactly that which CANNOT exist and so cannot come into any discussion of existence at all. That’s why neither Leibniz nor Hegel, nor any other philosopher, has ever claimed that existence has any relation to impossibility, and no philosopher has ever thought of creating a “proof” (which is to say an absolute fallacy!) of existence being in any way proved by what CANNOT EXIST. But, hey, Rebhahn is a hairdresser. What do you expect?! 1 + 1 = 2. Imagine if Plato, Descartes, Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, and so were all hair dressers in beauty parlors swallowing swords as a side hustle. No, don’t imagine it. The horror, the horror!

Rebhahn said,

“The Absolute is the collection of all possibilities. It is everything but the impossible.”

As ever, Rebhahn forgets compossibility. Countless things are technically possible but will never happen because they are not compossible.

Rebhahn just continuously fucks everything up. Because he’s a non-binary man looking for narcissistic supply and has zero interest in the truth. No authentic philosopher would ever take Rebhahn seriously. We certainly didn’t. His actual task from our point of view was to attract interest to OUR SYSTEM by being a shock artist and doing shocking things. But Rebhahn, as it turned out, was a malignant cerebral narc, with a profound insecurity about his lack of education, qualifications and intelligence, and he was desperate for people to tell him he was intelligent. And that’s what his Hyperian cult slaves are for. To reassure him that he’s really smart and not tell him the truth that he’s disastrously dumb.

Listen, we’re not dealing with “philosophy” when we disprove Rebhahn’s preposterous slaims. He is not making any actual philosophical assertions. He is just stating a host of errors and fallacies and we are correcting them. Actual philosophy is about really smart people addressing really smart arguments. None of that is happening with Hyperianism. An idiot is making idiotic statements to a bunch of idiots on social media (an Idiocracy!). Philosophy and intellect are 100% absent.

By the way, check out this picture:

https://www.facebook.com/MorgueOfficial/photos/a.300630383309627/1025486914157300

It’s captioned

“March 8, 2016 …

Death and the rose.

Snapchat: morgueofficial

Death carving created by my mother.”

Kimberlee Presson commented,

“Your mother is very talented.”

MOTHER? WTF! Rebhahn despises his mother. But, of course, we now know that Rebhahn had a foster family and thus a second mother – he must be referring to her. And now he has a third mother … DISGUSTING BREEDER BITCHELL.

Enough already!