BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON THE DANGEROUS CULT OF HYPERIANISM
• FROM THE CITIZEN JOURNALISTS OF THE AC •
It’s absolutely hilarious listening to a non-philosopher constantly getting Leibniz’s law wrong and then being unable to back down because he would be exposed as a fraud and conman if he did!
So, before we analyze Rebhahn’s latest nonsense regarding Leibniz’s law, let’s set the scene regarding this ONTOLOGICAL law.
We want EVERYONE to pay very close attention because Rebhahn’s whole game now is to use so much waffle and word salad that you can’t see how he is deliberately lying to you and conning you.
Come on people, be Leibnizian detectives, be actual philosophers. Be INTELLECTUAL – WOW! Actually consider the words used. Consider the words precisely, as actual philosophers do, and don’t just let them wash over you. Really THINK about what is being said. Think HARD. Come on, it’s fun. It really is. And you get to expose a total bullshitter who keeps digging his hole deeper and deeper … and can never get out.
Rebhahn actually RELIES on people to be too stupid to follow what he is saying.
His big tactic now is to try to pretend that functional identity and ontological are the same. They’re not!
We have ALWAYS stated that ontologically different monads can be in identical functional states while of course being completely different entities. This equates to a Hive Mind, i.e., reality is eternally made of MANY MINDS. There is no such thing EVER as an ontological One Mind.
So, the Encyclopedia Britannica says,
“Identity of indiscernibles; mathematics; Alternate titles: Leibniz’s Law; Key People: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz; Related Topics: Ship of Theseus identity … Identity of indiscernibles, principle enunciated by G.W. Leibniz that denies the possibility of two objects being numerically distinct while sharing all their properties in common. More formally, the principle states that if x is not identical to y, then there is some property P such that P holds of x and does not hold of y, or that P holds of y and does not hold of x. Equivalently, if x and y share all their properties, then x is identical to y. Its converse, the principle of the indiscernibility of identicals (also known as Leibniz’s Law), asserts that if x is identical to y, then every property of x is a property of y, and vice versa. Leibniz used the principle of the identity of indiscernibles in arguments for a variety of metaphysical doctrines, including the impossibility of Newtonian absolute space.”
Let’s just highlight the keyphrase
“[Leibniz] denies the possibility of two objects being numerically distinct while sharing all their properties in common.”
Pay close attention. Two things cannot be two things (numerically distinct) if they are identical (sharing all their properties in common). They are in fact just one thing. Leibniz was preoccupied with this exactly because of the question of whether you could have two monads that were IDENTICAL. By Leibniz’s law, you could NOT have this situation – because if two monads were identical, they would in fact be the same monad, i.e., they weren’t two monads at all, just one. Leibniz explicitly said, “It is also necessary that each monad be different from each other. For there are never two beings in nature that are perfectly alike…”
This is critical. TWO BEINGS IN NATURE ARE NEVER PERFECTLY ALIKE. Now, you can certainly have two monads being in functionally identical states – all of their sinusoids being perfectly aligned, but of course they are not the same monad; they are ONTOLOGICALLY DISTINCT.
The hilarious thing is that Rebhahn personally hates the term “Hive Mind” for various bizarre psychological hang-ups of his relating to his “diversity”, and also ideologically hates it because it does not serve the Woke, New Age Agenda which relies on “you are me, and I am you – therefore I can do whatever I like and you should always accept, respect and celebrate me and absolutely never harm me and discriminate against me.” So, one fine day, Rebhahn a person with no education and no qualifications, came across Leibniz’s law. He read it and failed to understand it, but was absolutely WOWED by his own catastrophic misunderstanding of the law – because it 100% reflected his hatred of the Hive Mind and it 100% supported his Woke dogmatism. And never forget what Bertrand Russell said,
“A stupid man’s report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand.”
So, Rebhahn, a stupid man, did not understand Leibniz’s law – produced by a metaphysical genius – and converted it into what he wanted to be true, i.e., that all minds can be the same mind. They can’t, of course, but, hey, we’re dealing with a sword-swallowing moron here. There’s no puzzle about why he fucked this up. He’s not intelligent!
Here’s the precise error Rebhahn made. He failed to grasp the difference between functional identity and ontological identity. Two ontologically distinct things can be in functionally identical states. Rebhahn made the catastrophic error of believing that functional identity MEANT ontological identity. So, he believed that if all monads are in the same functional state then they are, automatically, ontologically ONE MIND. (Except they’re not!) He CREAMED himself at this point. He actually believed he had made an astonishing breakthrough in ontological mathematics when in fact he had committed a simply staggering, mind-boggling ERROR.
The whole point of Leibniz’s law is that different things cannot be the same thing. Rebhahn’s whole game is to say that different things ARE the same thing. Sheez! 100% fail. In any intelligent environment, Rebhahn’s error would be career-ending. But he’s a cult leader, so no one gives a fuck! In fact, his cult slaves send him MORE money.
Rebhahn actually claimed that we outed him because we were terrified that he had made an amazing discovery and we wanted to “discredit” him. The sheer scale of this cretin’s delusions!
Let’s just remind you of precisely what he said:
“You know I’ve been thinking, I have contributed elements to OM the authors don’t discuss. I’m wondering if this freaked them out because they’d have to credit me and so they are trying to destroy my credibility and get me away from OM. I believe elements they don’t discuss because it shows an intrinsic unity between all of us and it’s hard to preach hate when that is foundational to existence I think some elements I’ve developed they just haven’t worked out yet. You’ll notice their ‘unity’ is always in terms of hives or swarms, which reflects mindless sameness. It’s also insane to me the argument that somehow OM implies genocide, a gender binary…”
Does Rebhahn associate a Hive Mind with “genocide”? It seems so! by the way, it’s EVOLUTION that supports a gender binary. Go complain to NATURE, you fucking unnatural freak! Also, can you believe the cretinism of a guy who attacks “sameness” and then in the next breath says we are all ONE MIND – the ultimate sameness! What a total fuckwit. And people actually listen to this dunce and give him money and spread his moronic garbage! Never forget that 100% of those that support this idiot are spreading his malignant stupidity. They are actively imposing his, and their, proven LIES on the world. That’s how disgusting and immoral these people are.
Anyway, you can see here that Rebhahn is specifically attacking ontologically distinct minds (which of course form an ontological Hive Mind and not an ontological One Mind) and specifically saying that there is an “intrinsic unity” (an ontological ONE MIND as opposed to an ontological Hive Mind), and he is saying that this revolutionizes ont math. In fact, it would falsify it if it were true, which of course it isn’t.
Rebhahn is 100% reliant on his MISUNDERSTANDING OF LEIBNIZ’S LAW FOR THESE LAUGHABLE AND TOTALLY WRONG CLAIMS OF HIS. He believes that when monads become functionally the same they also become ontologically the same, i.e. many minds become, supposedly, One Mind. And, Eureka, he thought he had metaphysical “proof” of the Woke wet dream – that we are both One and Many, One Mind and Many Minds, and, because we are One Mind, we should never be horrible to each other and should celebrate “diverse people” – like him! (Because, remember the whole point Of Rebhahn is to vindicate HIMSELF.)
He said,
“We are a single universal mind that divided itself into a multiplicity of minds by introducing difference.”
So, are you getting this, really getting it? Rebhahn literally says that there is “a single universal mind”. There are no ifs and buts here, nothing about different minds being in the same functional state. This is a strict ontological claim that there is ONLY ONE MIND, which would of course mean ONLY ONE MONAD, if we are dealing with a monadic system. Of course, philosophically, you don’t have to define mind in terms of monads. Schopenhauer didn’t and Buddhism doesn’t, for example. But ontological mathematics is 100% about monads and about an eternal ontological HIVE MIND of monads. But Rebhahn believes in something totally different: an ontological oscillation between ONE MONAD (Unity) and MANY MONADS (Diversity). This is a strict ontological IMPOSSIBILITY, but it’s essential to Rebhahn’s Woke drivel of “celebrating our diversity rather than hating each other for it”. Because if we are NOT one ontological mind, why SHOULDN’T we hate each other? Rebhahn NEEDS us to be an ontological ONE MIND to uphold his Woke worldview. His childish Woke “logic” is: we are actually one, so it makes no sense for you to hate me for being “diverse” since you would only be hating yourself … and if only everyone realized this what a wonderful world it would be. Kumbaya!
Of course, if we are ontologically distinct, which we are, then that whole ideology collapses. There is a fundamental reason why we can dislike each other – we are intrinsically different! And indeed actively competing with each other for scarce resources. In fact, the only thing that keeps us from each others’ throats all the time – and creating the permanent hell that Schopenhauer posited – is that we can and do enter into mathematical functional unity (zero entropy). Math saves us from total hate!
In Schopenhauer’s system of Will to Exist, and Nietzsche’s system of Will to Power, we are effectively in permanent savage competition with each other. But, in ontological mathematics, we have two modes: competition (entropic), and cooperation (non-entropic), and both modes are spectacularly explored – hence our very strange human world – but negentropy wins in the end and universal entropy is finally reduced to zero, hence ending that universe, and providing the starting condition for the next. You cannot start an entropic universe except from a zero-entropy state. The Big Bang begins from perfect FUNCTIONAL unity across a Hive Mind and creates total functional disunity (each mind in the Hive in a sense disconnects from the others, all at once). It certainly does not originate in an ontological unity, as Rebhahn claims.
In ont math, monads in the same functional state switch to monads in different, unique functional states at the Big Bang, generating enormous entropy (associated with space, time, matter, gravity, temperature, friction, and so on – the physical universe). That’s it. In Rebhahn’s joke system, the “Big Bang” is actually the One Mind “introducing difference” to “explore diversity” and is about One Universal Monad “fracturing” into many individual monads! Nothing to do with the physical universe! It’s about a MIND EXPLOSION!
Hyperianism – based on diversity – is a completely entropic, divisive system, generating conflict and competition.
Illuminism – based on functional unity – is a negentropic system promoting the collective good, the commonwealth, the general will, solidarity, working-class unity, showing what people have in common, not what separates them; what is the same about them … not highlighting what is different, as Hyperianism insists upon.
What we have here is Corey Rebhahn – a stupid person – uneducated, with no qualifications and zero philosophical literacy – talking to other stupid people. This is how mainstream religions get started. All that matters is faith. Rebhahn’s cult slaves believe a silly story and fully invest in it and then IGNORE all of the fallacies.
Tomorrow, we will go over what Rebhahn cretinously said to Storm the Delta in his deadstream regarding these matters.
It’s clear that this liar, plagiarist and conman – taking stupid people for a ride – is just going to keep repeating his lies and fallacies indefinitely. Because his cult is instantly terminated if he does not! We want everyone to be rolling their eyes and shaking their heads every time this dummy repeats his garbage about Leibniz’s law and the One Mind. And never forget that no slave in his cult EVER challenges him to answer us. Because they all know it’s game over if this moron tried to address what smart people say! Rebhahn must NEVER engage with anyone outside his cult. Only his cult slaves believe him.
Rebhahn has contradicted Leibniz no less … while using Leibniz’s law! Man, we are laughing so hard. A sword swallower against the discoverer of calculus, and the cultists have taken Rebhahn’s side. That’s the Dumbocalypse right there!
Not one Hyperian has any intellectual integrity. These people LOVE being lied to. And they love seeing ont math being wrecked by Corey Rebhahn. Ont math means NOTHING to them. These people have zero interest in the truth, and will believe anything Rebhahn tells them to believe. They have no critical faculties at all. That’s why they’re in a cult! They are DISGUSTING. These are the people who prevent humanity from evolving. They choose lies, they prefer lies. The truth disgusts them.
Well, we must praise Sanja Jan for completely owning the sick troll Ivieanne Rein Nightwell. Sanja Jan is 100% correct in the following exchange, and is reflecting what was said about this by others back when it first occurred:
Sanja Jan
Why does your friend have photos of her children online? The most kidnapping happens because of mums keep posting locations and photos of their kids.
Ivieanne Rein Nightwell
Really Really now are you sure you want to go there with me
Sanja Jan
lots of mums do that but its not safe for children. Yeah well you should know that i am right about this.
She should be more careful …
And all other mums as well…its for their child safety not for mine
Sanja Jan
im talking as a kindergarden teacher here.
Ivieanne Rein Nightwell
I advice you to stay in your depth of being a kindergarten teacher and out of personal life choices people that are capable adults make for themselves
Ivieanne Rein Nightwell
why don’t you ask her yourself unlike your friends I don’t jump to conclusions with mine
Sanja Jan
yeah probably she had a reason. But kid safety comes first
Ivieanne Rein Nightwell
posting pictures of your kids is not endangering them, she’s one of the best moms i know that goes above and beyond for her kids.
Sanja Jan
no kindergarden teacher or teacher would say that social media is a safe place. I can garantee you that. they should be warning parents..from posting photos of their children on social media..
Ivieanne Rein Nightwell
well alert #allfacebook parents
Sanja Jan
i say it like it is….if i said otherwise it would sound very strange : ”
I recommend posting children photos on social media because its a safe place to share photos and locations of your children…its complitely safe and private ,theres no danger to be found. Your kindergarden teacher….”
Lol i just cant agree with that lol
[So, is there anyone who WOULDN’T agree with Sanja Jan regarding these points? Everyone knows this is right … except Hyperians!]
De Lano said,
“Here’s the problem because I remember this very well. I remember one of the Illuminists use her Facebook link tag in a post in the group and then Pooks or “Mina” decided to threaten and complain that “You’re endangering my kids, remove the pictures now or I’m pressing charges” blah blah. So my thing is, if you’re so worried about your kids, why do you have them in your Facebook banner out of all places? Where if your page link is posted, it will include your kids?? So she’s at fault for that one.”
[That’s EXACTLY what we remember, and that was the whole point of our original comment which triggered this nonsensical, lying garbage from the two usual suspects! – and also led to PUKES formally complaining about our site … the Truth TORMENTS these people … they feel compelled to stop people telling the truth. By the way, PUKES is a PROVEN liar, as we shall prove by quoting herself about telling serious criminal lies! … Patience … wait until the end!]
Ivieanne Rein Nightwell replied,
“theres a difference in being worried about somebody else refering to your kids or being worried about your own kids due to you refering to them. theres a huge difference between those 2 things. anyhow why are we even disscussing her kids my post had nothing to do with the issue of her kids.”
[Can anyone follow this person’s “logic”? We just can’t understand anything she says. It seems to be something like: my friends can do whatever they like but my enemies cannot … big difference! Er, if your friend put her children’s pics on her profile that’s entirely on her. No one else put the pics there. It’s 100% her problem.]
De Lano said,
“My point is, she cannot play victim when she’s complicit in it. Her kids were never the topic to begin with. She brought it up and then referring back to my comment, that’s where the issue is. Can’t have your cake and eat it.”
[Exactly.]
Ivieanne Rein Nightwell said,
“but once again not the subject of my post.”
De Lano said,
“I was bouncing off of what Sanja was saying. Maybe someone else can address the main topic of your post.”
[What Sanja said was exactly what this was all about and Ivieanne Rein Nightwell then tried to turn it into fuck knows what. We can’t understand this person. None of what she says makes any sense regarding ANYTHING. It’s as if she mastered the impossibility of having a private language. Only she can understand herself!]
Here is this mad person’s latest offering:
Ivieanne Rein Nightwell is feeling amused:
“not only can they not understand humor they think its a type of deviance, but nothing new here, except subtext that they aknowlage underestimating observance and memory. oh im sorry am i supposed to be upset that you called me sick, you really shouldnt have called me diviant, delussional or sick that would have been insulting.”
So, trolling attacks on us are “humor”. Who knew? Maybe she means that referring to herself as a “dark psychologist” is funny. Is it? Is it as funny as Rebhahn referring to himself as a freak, monster and MURDERER? You see, we don’t get this weird, sick, perverted “humor”, if that’s what it’s supposed to be. We see it as a true CONFESSION.
“except subtext that they aknowlage underestimating observance and memory”
WTF! Can anyone work out what this means? Our memory regarding this was perfect. She’s the one constantly suffering from strategic amnesia. Remember how all of these people denied that Rebhahn had anything to do with the FBI, the swatting, the canceling of our website, the lawsuit, and all the rest of it? Man, these people must be suffering from severe dementia.
We stated a fact that PUKES put her own children on her Facebook profile and then COMPLAINED about people showing her profile with her children on it. The only person misremembering what happened and LYING relentlessly is this halfwit, self-styled “dark” psychologist. What the fuck does that mean – you’re studying how to be a sick troll making pointless remarks to intelligent people to defend a criminal plagiarist? Wow, that’s fucking DARK!
Seriously, does anyone comprehend what point this thing is trying to make? And still not a word about the screenshots definitively refuting the LIE by these people that Rebhahn wasn’t responsible for getting the AC canceled … just as PUKES is now trying to get the Daily Whistle canceled.
These people are fucking insane. It’s impossible to get any sense out of them. They don’t even seem to grasp basic English. Their only purpose in life is to defend cults and waste the time of smart people. That’s what it means to be absent from your own life. You are living an anti-life.
“not only can they not understand humor”
– HUMOR?! WTF!
You ain’t funny. You’re really, really sick. THIS is your life. Defending a cult leader forever just because … well, what the fuck else are you going to do with your pointless life? You have to insert yourself into someone’s business and annoy them, and you’ve chosen us. So it goes. If it wasn’t us, it would be someone else. You are a troll with no other life. You NEVER do anything good and positive. You have never done a constructive thing in your life. You wouldn’t know how.
“oh im sorry am i supposed to be upset that you called me sick, you really shouldnt have called me diviant, delussional or sick that would have been insulting.”
Why don’t you whine to someone who gives a fuck? You are just total trash … and you know it!
But hey, feel free to keep posting shit here FOR THE REST OF YOUR NON-LIFE. We post high-level philosophy every day. We educate people. What do you do?
Oh yeah … TROLL!
So, finally let’s get to PUKES, the person who has tried to end the Daily Whistle – to stop whistleblowers defending the public interest and the First Amendment. Let’s just tell you about this “wonderful mom”:
Mina Lotus Author:
[What is it with these dunces calling themselves “authors”. Is Trolling authoring these days?]
“I don’t write for the AC, or take on their stupid writing challenges. So you can grab a strap on and fuck your buddy Rowan up the ass.”
[This is the language of a person who complains about our language!]
Mina Lotus:
“He did say that ass fucking is SO EXHILARATING!! Lol”
Artemis Maenad replied,
“Why do you make fun of gay sex? I thought hyperians were all about pride.”
[Indeed!]
Mina Lotus said in reply,
“Artemis Maenad Are you his Slut Bot? Lol”
[So, this person seeks to get us canceled while, seemingly, she can be as offensive about us as she likes. Well, that’s Woke World for you!]
Here’s what we found online (by this person herself!):
About the Name
Pauline King Shannon, signs all her writing, and art, with her artist alias name: Pooks. A nickname that was given to her by a schizophrenic, it originally started off as: Pookey. An ex-boyfriend, shortened it to Pooks. Pooks created a label/ brand/ tag for the name. P.K.S are her initials, and with the design she created for it the “O”‘s create a crazy smiley face with it’s tongue sticking out. The face is symbolic of how there is two sides to her. One “O” is a peace sign. Which resembles her more quiet, “Lady- like”, introverted side. The other “O” is a swirl. Which resembles her spontaneous, playful, rebellious side. She designed the tag years ago, not knowing what she created or where she would take it. When she completed her first project at the New School of Colour, she signed her art with the name Pooks, and has continued to do so since. Following Salvador Dali’s foot steps, as he said he was becoming more Dali, Pauline becomes more Pooks.
[Is Pooks like CHUCKY, or some such? Is it like a demented alter – a schizoid alter ego?]
Pooks Bio
Pauline King Shannon was born in Winnipeg, Manitoba. However she grew up in a small mining town in northern Ontario called, Balmertown, ON.
Pauline has always been interested in art since she was a child, and from a counseling at a young age, learned that she can express herself through art. Pauline was mute (by choice) until she was 4 year old.
[Fuck! Why can’t you go back to being MUTE, you sick fuckwit?!]
She was placed in foster care at 2 years old after the death of her biological mother.. Pauline was adopted by the Shannon’s at the age of 6, and they allowed her to keep her biological last name, and just added Shannon onto her name when adopted. Hence why Pauline has two last names.
Pauline King Shannon graduated from Red Lake District High School, and received an Art award, English award, and Ojibwe award. From there, she moved to London, On in 2001 to go to Fanshawe College. Due to injuring her hand with a hammer, she didn’t complete the 3 year arts program, and was out after the first year.
Pauline almost quit art then. Especially after having a professor say that she should quit all together, or just stick to “native art”.
[Native Art?!]
It wasn’t until years later, after having children, and fighting for the custody of her children did her passion for art get reignited.
Pauline was depressed, and starving her self to death slowly until she took her foster fathers advice, and went to the Ark Aid Street Mission. A soup kitchen in London, ON.
It was there that Pauline nurtured herself back to health, and stumbled upon an art program (the New School of Colour) that was being held in the basement of The Ark.
And that is where Pauline’s Art journey really took off. Pauline signed her paintings with the art alias name Pooks. Through the New School of Colour, Pauline got to participate in many art exhibitions, and art shows.
In 2013, Pauline gave secondary education another go at the University of Western Ontario. Pauline was enrolled in the Visual Arts program. But once again, due to another injury, she didn’t complete the program. This time Pauline fell down a flight of stairs and severely sprained her ankle which took longer than expected to heal.
Within this time period, Pauline got involved with the Twitter Art Exhibit, and has been involved year after year. Making Pauline a now, International artist.
Pauline began volunteering at The Arts Project as a floater. And she continued with The New School of Colour until 2015.
She got involved in another relationship, had a couple more children. And that relationship ended in 2017. Pauline left that toxic relationship with the children, and was homeless and living in shelters until December 2018.
Art helped Pauline pay off some debt that needed to be paid in order to be eligible for Rent-geared-to-income housing. Thanks to Pauline’s connections that she was able to hold an online art auction where other artists got involved and donated their work as well. The team effort, helped get Pauline and her family housing eligibility.
Since then, Pauline has been slowly getting her life stabilized, and continues to get her work out into the world as an Independent Artist. She has also been a Redbubble artist for the last 2-3 years.
[WTF!]
Pauline King Shannon was born in Winnipeg, Manitoba, and was raised in a small town called Balmertown, Ontario. She now resides in London, Ontario. She is very proud of her community; Old East Village, and East of Adelaide (EOA).
She graduated from Red Lake District High School, and attended one year at Fanshawe College in Fine Arts.
Pauline has experienced a lot of abuse in her life time, growing up as a child, to 2 abusive relationships, one after the other.
She gave birth to a son in 2005 and a daughter in 2008.
On December 4, 2008, Pauline was physically assaulted by her partner. Her partner did spend some time in jail, and there was a restraining order filed on him, but he broke that immediately by contacting her by phone. She agreed to try reconciling, but since there was a court order in place against her partner, she ended up lying to many people in her partner’s defense [PROVEN LIAR IN A CRIMINAL MATTER!!!]. All the lying, neglect, and disrespect led to depression. Things just returned to the way they were before.
After a miscarriage, her partner broke up with her because she shut down completely. She refused to even have intercourse with him. Out of spite, her now ex partner took their kids one weekend in October, and did not return them home. Their agreement was that the children would visit the ex on weekends and on weekdays be with their mother. Both have been going to court since. But since the children have been in the ex’s care for these past years, he is considered the primary caregiver now. And Pauline battles for access, with the goal of having weekends and joint custody.
After the loss of her children, she did get severely depressed. She was suicidal. For months she just lied in bed, and slept and starved.
Random Thoughts of an Alien Goddess.
[Well, you wanted the AC’s attention. Now you’ve got it.] We are now wondering if we should contact social services. Your children are in tremendous peril from you! You are a chaotic person who has lived a life of total chaos. What chance do your children have? Instead of learning any lessons and altering your behavior, you have joined a cult and are trolling intelligent people and trying to cause as much offense and aggravation as you possible can. There’s no way you are raising your three poor children well. Look at how much time and effort you expend trolling us! Is that what good mothers are supposed to do? You are consumed with the Hyperian cult and are clearly neglecting your children. What Hyperian nonsense are you exposing your children to? Are you brainwashing them? Are you exposing them to degenerate Hyperian filth? It is ASTONISHING that we are being attacked by someone who, be her own admission, is seriously mentally ill and has often contemplated suicide and openly admits to LYING to the law to protect an offender.
Only an insane person would make an attack, knowing that she is at incredibly HIGH RISK of losing custody of her children as a direct result of her actions.
This is now an extremely serious matter. If you have any sense at all, you should leave this scene entirely and go and try to be a decent mother. Spend time with your children, not trolling us. What kind of monster are you? Do the sane thing. Get out of this. Don’t say that we didn’t give you a chance.
Tags: Corey Rebhahn, Morgue Official, Morgen Night, Hyperianism, Hyperionism, Hyperian, Hyperion, AMC Freakshow, Inner Star Actualization, Cult of Hyperianism, Hyperian Founder, Morgue Official Real Name, What is Hyperianism, Hyperianism Beliefs